DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
I'm not suggesting they should have a separate warrant for a safe. My point is that the threshold to find probable cause to search a home is very high. Some concerned people at a church talking about weight loss, track marks, and a livestream where he has white powder on his nose seems pretty flimsy. I totally understand that a welfare check should've been done, but a raid? I don't know...
They should have just gone in and pistol-whipped Nick in front of the women
The kids themselves complained they were hungry and weren't getting fed. They were wearing the same dirty clothes for days on end and smelled. Combine that with an obvious junkie on screen on multiple occasions and yeah, you're going to want to bust the door in and determine what the fuck drugs and shenanigans are going on. This was mostly for the kids' sake.
I'm just always weary when it comes to cops raiding homes. It's probably more dangerous for the kids doing that than just sending a cop/social worker to interview them when they're at religion class. Not saying it would've turned into a Waco or Ruby Ridge scenario, but I'm sure the cops were amped up with guns drawn
I don’t think there needs to be a separate warrant, only that the warrant issued would be specific enough to have to search a safe. If the safe is say a foot by a foot, and theres a warrant for a shotgun, they can’t search the safe because a shotgun can’t reasonably be in there.
Well the one saving grace for the kids was that the cops didn’t know about the firearms. If they did they no doubt would have been extremely amped, considering you’re talking 3 junkies, 5 kids in a house with guns
iv.ggtyler.dev
From my cursory web searches it appears that there's no separate warrant necessary for safes in Minnesota.
You’re a boot licker.
Fuck no. But obviously in this case it took zog bots to rescue those kids. No one else was stepping up. Besides, anyone else taking the kids would have been charged with kidnapping by the junkie parents so there was no other choice.
Its a tough one man, genuinely, on one hand the state taking your kids is dystopian, on the other hand literally who the hell else is gonna do it. It’s either the state takes them or they ingest drugs and OD or starve to death.
Thankfully, they were placed with their grandparents right away and are still there last I heard.
Kayla Rekieta (not Nick funnily enough)was charged with paragraph (a)(2) of 609.378.1 which explicitly state she knowingly let someone else molest/beat the children. Paragraph (a)(1) is for general abuse/neglect(including deprivation), which she was not charged with. This is probably a filing error unless someone gets popped for child abuse. So yes, specifically sexual/physical abuse allegations as of now.
Lol. I don't know if it's like this in Minnesota, but a few years ago the religious homeschoolers were VERY paranoid about CPS taking their kids away. Combine that with tweaker paranoid and If they had sent for a welfare interview it would been much more likely snowball into a shootout between Cokeita and the sheriff's office. Waiting for him to leave like they did was for sure the safer option for everyone involved.
For a minute I though someone paid to superchat Boq.
I'd pay him to shut up tsss
You really are retarded sometimes
Was everyone on here not freaking out about CPS taking kids from anti-gook-flu parents?
I wasn't here for that but so what? It's reasonable to argue about the dangers of covid and the propriety of removing children from parents on the basis of a disease that didn't kill kids. No reasonable person would argue that leaving kids in a home with an ounce of coke and unsecured firearms is appropriate.
