WWAWD Nick Rekieta arrested on drug charges?

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

The kids themselves complained they were hungry and weren't getting fed. They were wearing the same dirty clothes for days on end and smelled. Combine that with an obvious junkie on screen on multiple occasions and yeah, you're going to want to bust the door in and determine what the fuck drugs and shenanigans are going on. This was mostly for the kids' sake.

I'm just always weary when it comes to cops raiding homes. It's probably more dangerous for the kids doing that than just sending a cop/social worker to interview them when they're at religion class. Not saying it would've turned into a Waco or Ruby Ridge scenario, but I'm sure the cops were amped up with guns drawn

 

[Suetonius]

Do we know if they cracked the safes? Maybe they were unlocked. Separate warrants for safes is stupid anyways - they're searching the house. The safes are in the house. It's not legal to have drugs just because they're in a safe.

I don’t think there needs to be a separate warrant, only that the warrant issued would be specific enough to have to search a safe. If the safe is say a foot by a foot, and theres a warrant for a shotgun, they can’t search the safe because a shotgun can’t reasonably be in there.

But speaking that the warrant was for drugs, which could be put in something as small as a jewelry box, I don’t see any reason why they couldn’t check the safe if it were unlocked. Obviously if it were locked the police can’t force the suspect to open it and then they’d have to have a judge sign off on a separate warrant to break open the safe.

 

[Suetonius]

I'm just always weary when it comes to cops raiding homes. It's probably more dangerous for the kids doing that than just sending a cop/social worker to interview them when they're at religion class. Not saying it would've turned into a Waco or Ruby Ridge scenario, but I'm sure the cops were amped up with guns drawn

Well the one saving grace for the kids was that the cops didn’t know about the firearms. If they did they no doubt would have been extremely amped, considering you’re talking 3 junkies, 5 kids in a house with guns

 

[RobertMewler]

Holy shit, Legal Mindset is actually slamming Nick for neglecting his kids and bashing "Nick simps". Good for him:

Nick Rekieta Search Warrant Revealed (LIVE)

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtiec4EBNN3iiNgXHgykm9A/join ============================================================= 🔗LINKS🔗 Locals: https://legalmindset.locals.com/ Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/LegalMindset INSTAGRAM...

iv.ggtyler.dev

He's covering the search warrant. I only started watching the stream a minute ago, will have to scroll back to see the whole rant.

 

[The NaTurryl Man]

I don’t think there needs to be a separate warrant, only that the warrant issued would be specific enough to have to search a safe. If the safe is say a foot by a foot, and theres a warrant for a shotgun, they can’t search the safe because a shotgun can’t reasonably be in there.

But speaking that the warrant was for drugs, which could be put in something as small as a jewelry box, I don’t see any reason why they couldn’t check the safe if it were unlocked. Obviously if it were locked the police can’t force the suspect to open it and then they’d have to have a judge sign off on a separate warrant to break open the safe.

From my cursory web searches it appears that there's no separate warrant necessary for safes in Minnesota.

 

[Ashamed]

The kids themselves complained they were hungry and weren't getting fed. They were wearing the same dirty clothes for days on end and smelled. Combine that with an obvious junkie on screen on multiple occasions and yeah, you're going to want to bust the door in and determine what the fuck drugs and shenanigans are going on. This was mostly for the kids' sake.

You’re a boot licker.

 

[RobertMewler]

You’re a boot licker.

Fuck no. But obviously in this case it took zog bots to rescue those kids. No one else was stepping up. Besides, anyone else taking the kids would have been charged with kidnapping by the junkie parents so there was no other choice.

 

[Suetonius]

Fuck no. But obviously in this case it took zog bots to rescue those kids. No one else was stepping up. Besides, anyone else taking the kids would have been charged with kidnapping by the junkie parents so there was no other choice.

Its a tough one man, genuinely, on one hand the state taking your kids is dystopian, on the other hand literally who the hell else is gonna do it. It’s either the state takes them or they ingest drugs and OD or starve to death.

 

[RobertMewler]

Its a tough one man, genuinely, on one hand the state taking your kids is dystopian, on the other hand literally who the hell else is gonna do it. It’s either the state takes them or they ingest drugs and OD or starve to death.

Thankfully, they were placed with their grandparents right away and are still there last I heard.

 

[Africa.com]

Boq getting involved for the numbahs

 

[Africa.com]

For a minute I though someone paid to superchat Boq.

I'd pay him to shut up tsss

 

[The NaTurryl Man]

on one hand the state taking your kids is dystopian

You really are retarded sometimes

 

[Suetonius]

You really are retarded sometimes

Was everyone on here not freaking out about CPS taking kids from anti-gook-flu parents?

 

[The NaTurryl Man]

Was everyone on here not freaking out about CPS taking kids from anti-gook-flu parents?

I wasn't here for that but so what? It's reasonable to argue about the dangers of covid and the propriety of removing children from parents on the basis of a disease that didn't kill kids. No reasonable person would argue that leaving kids in a home with an ounce of coke and unsecured firearms is appropriate.

 

[Suetonius]

No reasonable person would argue that leaving kids in a home with an ounce of coke and unsecured firearms is appropriate.

Well yeah of course. The way I meant what I said was

“I know taking kids from homes is dystopian (in other cases not like this), but this is a really obvious case where its completely right”

I’m not very good at saying what I mean…

 

[RobertMewler]

The now infamous safe room:

Pics are from the listing in 2018:

12291 51st St NE, Spicer, MN 56288 | Zillow

This 2676 square feet Single Family home has 4 bedrooms and 4 bathrooms. It is located at 12291 51st St NE, Spicer, MN.

www.zillow.com

 

[Africa.com]

The now infamous safe room:

12291 51st St NE, Spicer, MN 56288 | Zillow

This 2676 square feet Single Family home has 4 bedrooms and 4 bathrooms. It is located at 12291 51st St NE, Spicer, MN.

www.zillow.com

It's depressing to look at the Zillow and see such a nice property have truly low quality and ugly finishes. The kitchen is especially egregious

 

[guest]

It's depressing to look at the Zillow and see such a nice property have truly low quality and ugly finishes. The kitchen is especially egregious

Beats this, crackheadster:

 

[Africa.com]

Beats this, crackheadster:

View attachment 202039

Your idea of trim is duct tape, stupid

 

[LockedHDD__Pot]

Its a tough one man, genuinely, on one hand the state taking your kids is dystopian, on the other hand literally who the hell else is gonna do it. It’s either the state takes them or they ingest drugs and OD or starve to death.

it is a tough one, even though I've sobered-up I don't generally object to people taking drugs... but not if it's to the detriment of innocent kids.
I'm not a fan of 'the state' either, & they're mostly useless bureaucrats who couldn't do anything meaningful, but having guns & drugs laying around a house with 5 kids ain't good

PS. sorry if I was mean the other day, I was in a weird place