I'll just leave this here, then.

[DominusOdium]

That ship sailed long, long ago, bruh. At this point, in for a penny, in for a pound.

Pounding is right.

 

[ChimpanZ]

“Bruh” “y’all” why is he so embarrassing

 

[AliceWorquer]

You're wrong. Because it's not a "scale" in terms of one thing balancing the other. It's a ranking system. I rank you lower than a celibate pedophile. The rank of pedophile does not rise as a result of that. There is no fulcrum. You are the lowest of the low. And deliberately, too, which is puzzling.

That's it for you. You aren't worth my time.

What do you think a scale is? Its a tool for quantifying and comparing things so you can put them in order. It doesn't literally have to balance on a fulcrum. How autistic are you?
When humans use comparative adjectives like "lower" to describe anything other than the physical vertical position of something, they are generally implying some kind of hierarchy, especially when used to describe abstract ideas, like human morality

A<B = B>A

How are you this stupid? Why are you trying to argue semantics when you are clearly a complete blithering idiot?

 

[DominusOdium]

jackie drop that gibney evidence yet?

I thought we were just to trust her word as the foremost expert on opsec, goatse, OSINT and hacking butt, legally.

 

[TorquieTwoBeers]

I see pedophile defender Eric Hildeman went to the Patrick Tomlinson school of arguing. Ignore everything that definitively proves you wrong, carefully select points to argue, laugh/"Fuck, you're stupid"/"no, u" your way through rebuttal, don't actually argue anything, don't provide evidence, insist that actually debating is not worth your time despite spending tons of time "arguing", all while being married to a disgusting pig. When you do it on Facebook, you toss in complaining to the mods like a baby.

You think fantasizing about raping children (but not acting on those fantasies!!!!) is morally superior to leaving easily removable comments on an ignored online obituary. You're trash and your wife is hideous.

 

[RoxburyRick]

"Celebrite." Good one.

Do you think Mama Raven dispatched a Slipknot mash pit?

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

Plead "No Contest" (a.k.a. Guilty) to hurry up and get it over with before more victims came forward if there was a big, publicized trial. There have been a lot of reports from many other young teens over the years accusing of him drugging and raping them, but he's very well protected by powerful people who have the same taste for kids as he does, so the young girls are just smeared as damaged kids from broken homes looking to make money from a rich and famous celebrity.

Don Henley - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

View attachment 155062

so he was basically The Colonel from Boogie Nights? Henley was a fucking piece of shit. and that other faggot who died. Joe Walsh is a good egg. He is the example of the boomer that needs to be fed into a wood chipper feet first.

 

[fricklefrackle]

A middle aged man...

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

That ship sailed long, long ago, bruh. At this point, in for a penny, in for a pound.

Bruh? Wow you’re a real cringe douche

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

He's a fedora tipping, bald, girly voiced manlet with a gigapig wife who calls people "my dude" and "y'all" because he lives online.

He is quite the weak loser!

 

[TorqueWheeler]

I think moby’s comment was more embarrassing

Me too but still.

 

[TorqueWheeler]

You're wrong. Because it's not a "scale" in terms of one thing balancing the other. It's a ranking system. I rank you lower than a celibate pedophile. The rank of pedophile does not rise as a result of that. There is no fulcrum. You are the lowest of the low. And deliberately, too, which is puzzling.

That's it for you. You aren't worth my time.

So basically you're just a fucking imbecile who thinks making fun of people on the internet makes you worse than people who masturbate over children being raped; presumably because only one of them can ever affect you. You sniveling little cunt.

 

[TorqueWheeler]

@NormsGhost - Incapable of answering honestly or without avoiding the questions?

I guess that answered that then, faggot.

 

[stealthygeek]

Do the kiwis have a thread for Pedophile Defender Hildy? Because 25k views seems insane for the most boring 40+ page thread in the history of the site.

 

[RickReternal]

He’s exactly like Pat. “You’re wrong because I say so and I don’t need to explain or argue honestly because you use naughty words, accurately describe how revolting the woman I married is, and don’t participate in online virtue signaling with other fucking faggots like me.”

Get fucked, Hildy. I’m tired of seeing this thread on the LitCrit front page. You know what to do if your “virtue” in a certain area weakens.

 

[guest]

Question for @NormsGhost

What is your stance on AI-generated child pornography? If you are fine with "non offending" pedophiles, then surely you should have no problem with AI-generated child pornography, as no real children are harmed in its production.

 

[More Worser]

I know right. Such disingenuous language. "I became aware" Wtf does that mean? Ew.

He became aware of the tent pole in his trousers

 

[guest]

He became aware of the tent pole in his trousers

Ohhhhhh DID HE?