• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

I'll just leave this here, then.

More Worser

Not Mexican. Not jewish. NOT bald.😡
Forum Clout
7,459
Plead "No Contest" (a.k.a. Guilty) to hurry up and get it over with before more victims came forward if there was a big, publicized trial. There have been a lot of reports from many other young teens over the years accusing of him drugging and raping them, but he's very well protected by powerful people who have the same taste for kids as he does, so the young girls are just smeared as damaged kids from broken homes looking to make money from a rich and famous celebrity.

View attachment 155062
That's crazy, I bet the jews in the music industry were shocked and dismayed
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
115,104
You're wrong. Because it's not a "scale" in terms of one thing balancing the other. It's a ranking system. I rank you lower than a celibate pedophile. The rank of pedophile does not rise as a result of that. There is no fulcrum. You are the lowest of the low. And deliberately, too, which is puzzling.
What the hell do you not get about this. Yes. Even in a ranking system it is a fucking scale. If you ranked moral improprieties on a list and I saw pedophilia above vandalism I would say what in the fuck makes you think PEDOPHILIA is BETTER than vandalism…Not why you think vandalism is WORSE. Because there is no fucking argument for vandalism being worse. It is not the moral quandary or gotcha you think it is. It is objectively not. You’re so goddamn dumb and you won’t admit you retardedly chose pedophilia as the one issue to die on. Not murder, assault, drunk driving, etc. which would all be retarded either way but fucking pedophilia. You can’t just admit you’re wrong. And the more you double down on this the more you look like a pedophile. And if you want to defend the right for people to jerk off to kids, think about fucking kids, sexualizing them, watch kids pervertedly, etc, and somehow rationalize thats better than spray paint on a gravestone, you can keep showing off how retarded you are to everyone.
That's it for you. You aren't worth my time.
Now respond again, little puppy, like how you keep saying you’re leaving then coming back minutes later.
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
115,104
@NormsGhost There is literally no way you can rationalize this outside our bubble and yours. If any green motherfucker looked at what you said, IE. “I’ve defended celibate pedophiles” “Because I defended those who lust after children”, you will be looked at in disgust. And try explaining to them your genius concept how vandalism is actually worse. But when no one inevitably gets it and thinks you’re a creep you’ll be secure in thinking … “No one gets it man. I’m just THAT smart.”
 
G

guest

Guest
That's crazy, I bet the jews in the music industry were shocked and dismayed

Another unribbed comment about Jews... who knew??

Screenshot_20230928-105327.png
 

ThePepsiColaRapist

Dan doesn’t have a penis. I. Do.
Forum Clout
19,273
You're wrong. Because it's not a "scale" in terms of one thing balancing the other. It's a ranking system. I rank you lower than a celibate pedophile. The rank of pedophile does not rise as a result of that. There is no fulcrum. You are the lowest of the low. And deliberately, too, which is puzzling.

That's it for you. You aren't worth my time.
This coming from the guy who paid middle school "bullies" to pee in his mouth.
 

JumboYumYums

Prison awaits, stlaker.
Forum Clout
2,933
You're wrong. Because it's not a "scale" in terms of one thing balancing the other. It's a ranking system. I rank you lower than a celibate pedophile. The rank of pedophile does not rise as a result of that. There is no fulcrum. You are the lowest of the low. And deliberately, too, which is puzzling.

That's it for you. You aren't worth my time.
Meaning you rank pedophiles higher than people who say mean things on the internet to absolute nobodies. Glad to hear you admit it you fuckin freak.
 

PickleRickle

You are not a glowie. You are just stupid.
Forum Clout
43,829
Imagine washing your wifes panties and they're all encrusted with retard poo? What the fuck, Hildo? The people saying how your wife is denying you her femininity have nailed ya' with the truth. You cant recover from that. That is something that women in abusive relationships will do, then you factor in the pants shitting and how bad you want to be face to waist wit dem kieedz....what are ya doin?

Start respecting your wife and show her true love. You can start by LEAVING AND NEVER RETURN
 

stealthygeek

Reminder: Vincent D'Onofrio blocked Patrick
Forum Clout
49,825
You're wrong. Because it's not a "scale" in terms of one thing balancing the other. It's a ranking system. I rank you lower than a celibate pedophile. The rank of pedophile does not rise as a result of that. There is no fulcrum. You are the lowest of the low. And deliberately, too, which is puzzling.

That's it for you. You aren't worth my time.
"Celibate pedophiles" are who create a demand for child porn, you fucking ghoul. You're taking a pro-CP production stance and telling everyone you have the moral highground here because we call a fat asshole a fat asshole.
 

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
235,054
"Celibate pedophiles" are who create a demand for child porn, you fucking ghoul. You're taking a pro-CP production stance and telling everyone you have the moral highground here because we call a fat asshole a fat asshole.
He also used the term “inactive pedophile” which was a first - Hildy has multiple terms for the “good” kind of pedophiles.
 
Forum Clout
7,440
@NormsGhost

A couple of earnest questions: how have you not been repelled by Pat's personality yet? I get why you may not be the biggest fan of these parts, but he has a any uncanny proficiency for pushing everyone away. Do you really buy his tough guy LARP? I mean, you don't find it at all little bit funny? You do see how he truly has an addiction (chasing attention on Twitter), and how it's having a negative impact on his life, personally, professionally and fiscally, not unlike a problematic relationship with drugs, alcohol or gambling?
 

NormsGhost

...and I AM funny!
Forum Clout
-893
@NormsGhost

A couple of earnest questions: how have you not been repelled by Pat's personality yet? I get why you may not be the biggest fan of these parts, but he has a any uncanny proficiency for pushing everyone away. Do you really buy his tough guy LARP? I mean, you don't find it at all little bit funny? You do see how he truly has an addiction (chasing attention on Twitter), and how it's having a negative impact on his life, personally, professionally and fiscally, not unlike a problematic relationship with drugs, alcohol or gambling?
I generally don't answer questions about Patrick. But just to get it out of the way once and for all, he's never been anything other than cordial to me in person and in our messages to each other. He comes off as gruff on Twitter, but hey, you bring that out in him deliberately, then attack him for it, sort of like stabbing someone in the leg and then calling him lame.
 

Will Tate

Oven March
Forum Clout
42,203
He comes off as gruff on Twitter, but hey, you bring that out in him deliberately, then attack him for it, sort of like stabbing someone in the leg and then calling him lame.
It's long been established that Pat was an abrasive, odious asshole long before anyone here ever heard of him so don't you dare blame his piss-poor attitude on us, you disingenuous pedophile.
 
Top