- Forum Clout
- 76,453
Listen, Mews is a 58 year old gook with a pleasant disposition (and a perchance to recite passages of Mein Kampf), of course she tried to be nice at first.You sounded genuine in your compliments
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Listen, Mews is a 58 year old gook with a pleasant disposition (and a perchance to recite passages of Mein Kampf), of course she tried to be nice at first.You sounded genuine in your compliments
Wow. Those grapes are really sour.One doesn't have "impact" and secure "leverage" against people who barely know or care you exist.
I was genuine with both compliment and insult. Your wife has destroyed any hint of femininity and cuteness she ever possessed and you should be angry because it's an insult to YOU. Rather than get fit and cute for herself and her man she went for the dyke look. Sad. Many such cases.
Hey! I'm 57 years young. I'll be 58 in March.Listen, Mews is a 58 year old gook with a pleasant disposition (and a perchance to recite passages of Mein Kampf), of course she tried to be nice at first.
Can you post a vocaroo of the clip or upload to YouTube?Yeah, I don't buy it. You sounded genuine in your compliments, and insincere in your attacks. Retcon all you like, but you can't make me believe it, so oopsie doodles, yourself.
No backsies!
"Obviously I meant a totally different movie that doesn't make me look like a pedophile". Also in your idiotic edit that you've just added to that blog post, you say that Portman was 19 in Episode I. She wasn't. She was 16. It filmed in 1997.Interesting. Obviously I meant Episode III.
V for Vendetta came out in 2006. Episode III, which you're now claiming is what you meant when you said "Star Wars I killed the magic", came out in 2005. I know someone as pathetic as you saw Episode III as soon as it came out, so is your new fabricated story that you only became attracted to Natalie Portman when you saw V For Vendetta, ie, a year after you said she already lost "the magic"? Get your story straight, pedophile.I first became aware of Natalie Portman as a sex symbol in V for Vendetta.
Sort of like you retro-editing comments onto me? Come on, dude.Patrick-tier logic, right there.
"I never lie. Lying isn't lying if it's to someone I don't like. So I never lie."
That is gaslighting. You've actually gaslit yourself into believing your own bullshit. That's called cognitive dissonance, the mark of a narcissist, which again makes sense because you're in a marriage with a fucked up power dynamic over a helpless mentally ill shit beast.
You people are all the same.
Edit: "It's amazing how much you get wrong."
Patrick, is that you back there silly?
Is it also hilarious how much “cyber security hacking expert” Jackie has got WRONG so far? She’s ran with the most flimsy of evidence accusing innocent people of serious crimes and spreading it all over twitter. What are your thoughts on that? She has been nowhere near close on her doxxes and comes off like an idiot."Gaslighting," doesn't apply, because you are all my adversaries. One is justified in lying to an adversary, and y'all lie about me all the time, so turnabout is fair play.
That having been said, I really haven't needed to lie. It's hilarious how much you get wrong.
Reminder: Hildy's only here to "raise his profile with SFWA". Shinkleboutit. He's so pathetic, he wants to be accepted by evil psychos who support child rapists (Ed Kramer for one).I believe I'll achieve that someday, especially if you idiots keep insulting me and thus raising my profile with SFWA.
I’ve heard that before…Sort of like you retro-editing comments onto me? Come on, dude.
I think I'm done for today. Y'all are boring.
He’s notSort of like you retro-editing comments onto me? Come on, dude.
I think I'm done for today. Y'all are boring.
I don’t think there’s even one person on this forum funnier than Ban when she has a target lock on another womanyour ugly wife has stinky shits all day all night
60 posts ago you said you might be done for the week. You're not immune to our charm, Eric.Sort of like you retro-editing comments onto me? Come on, dude.
I think I'm done for today. Y'all are boring.
That would make her 17. Still a typo, though. Also, Christina Hendricks, Susan Sarandon, Pat Benatar, etc. etc.you say that Portman was 19 in Episode I. She wasn't. She was 16. It filmed in 1997.
He didn’t even make it 10 minutes this time.That would make her 17. Still a typo, though. Also, Christina Hendricks, Susan Sarandon, Pat Benatar, etc. etc.
V for Vendetta came out in 2005, moron.
…and he’s back!That would make her 17. Still a typo, though. Also, Christina Hendricks, Susan Sarandon, Pat Benatar, etc. etc.
V for Vendetta came out in 2005, moron.
No, I got it right. This isn't a fixed list. Morality is subjective. You are saying that you think people who fantasize about molesting and raping kids but haven't acted on it (YET) are morally superior to people who pull easily erased pranks on the internet.Aaaaand gets it wrong again. Not defending the celibate pedophile. I'm attacking you.
Get it? The pedophile isn't being elevated, you are being lowered.
And with luck he'll become oneI didn't call you a Nazi. I called Will Tate one.
I saw earlier he also referred to them as “inactive pedophiles” which is even worse. Sounds like “he’s into kids but his diddling days are behind him, so it’s ok!”No, I got it right. This isn't a fixed list. Morality is subjective. You are saying that you think people who fantasize about molesting and raping kids but haven't acted on it (YET) are morally superior to people who pull easily erased pranks on the internet.
Keep arguing semantics over the words "defend" and "elevated". Bottom line is that you think celibate pedophiles are better people than online pranksters. That's disgusting, and by my own estimation makes you a defender of celibate pedophiles.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/