Somebody’s DRUNK

[Jenna]

here's your top given .... quid pro quo..

rib_getter	reaction_type	count_
IGotATreeOnMyHouse85	ribs	532
TorqueWheeler	ribs	410
captain_kamala	ribs	392
Slackjawed Cow	ribs	385
Meownaw	ribs	361
DanMullen'sRetardedNephew	ribs	263
SpaceEdge	ribs	260
Sink Inspector	ribs	238
Harry Powell	ribs	224
Patreeky	ribs	223
admin	ribs	203
RobertMewler	ribs	195
NoBacon	ribs	183
Sue Lightning	ribs	166
Duxbury Dave	ribs	158
Honey Badger	ribs	144
chocolatehellhole	ribs	140
HH Brother	ribs	133
McGowan6	ribs	127
Salted Earth Truffle	ribs	124

@Meownaw

rib_getter	reaction_type	count_
Slackjawed Cow	ribs	5123
IGotATreeOnMyHouse85	ribs	3849
Stent	ribs	3280
Patreeky	ribs	3077
Lucyfer	ribs	2957
Maxheinie's Old Stinkers	ribs	2598
HotDogJoe	ribs	2330
DanMullen'sRetardedNephew	ribs	2282
Gay Faggot.	ribs	2076
Sue Lightning	ribs	1942
Dummy Gaynuts	ribs	1914
BonnieMcFarlaneMe2	ribs	1911
Cuphead	ribs	1876
TorqueWheeler	ribs	1865
Harry Powell	ribs	1862
TheGhostOfAbeVigoda	ribs	1846
RobertMewler	ribs	1836
Lamont & Tonelli	ribs	1830
Brooke Shields	ribs	1780
McGowan6	ribs	1779

This is just going to be a list of the people with the most posts though essentially. I'd need a way to weight (heh...) these vs the number of posts they have. I suck at stats though. There's a few ways to slice the data. It could be something like percentage of the rib giver's total ribs. The inverse also makes sense. A percentage of all ribs received were from X user.

Another way could be as a function of their total posts as I mentioned. This seems to intuitively be right, but as I said I'm bad at stats.



this post is brought to you by autism^tm

If you didn't make this list odds are I hate you. NoBacon made the list ffs what excuse do the rest of you have??

 

[Turk February]

that's not my list dummy the first is jenna's and the second is @Meownaw

We all secretly want to fuck Jenna. You're not saying anything we don't already know.

 

[Turk February]

If you didn't make this list odds are I hate you. NoBacon made the list ffs what excuse do the rest of you have??

I was talking about a different Jenna earlier.

 

[Turk February]

@Jenna reactions are weighted based on the number of comments, but I still don't like this as it weights posters with too few posts. I think i need some kind of zscore (https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/hypothesis-testing/t-score-vs-z-score/) pfg-score? To weight the ratio against the stddevs of #s of posts? Idnk i'm making shit up.

https://new.onaforums.net/members/bollywood-supreme.4948/ --- batting 1.000

# rib_getter	reaction_id	total_posts	reaction_type	count_	ratio_
Bollywood Supreme	1	1	ribs	1	1
Dont Ban Me Quasi	1	19	ribs	11	0.5789
Stevieboi94	9	2	car_crash	1	0.5
KurlanO	1	3	ribs	1	0.3333
MEXICO	1	4	ribs	1	0.25
GetOffMyLawn_3	1	30	ribs	6	0.2
SethSimon	1	36	ribs	7	0.1944
ErinSith	1	11	ribs	2	0.1818
Big Ass Dick Holder #1488	1	19	ribs	3	0.1579
Filthy Pierre	1	7	ribs	1	0.1429
whyarewedoingthisagain_mybb	1	7	ribs	1	0.1429
Smith	1	7	ribs	1	0.1429
The Iron Sheik	1	8	ribs	1	0.125
VoodooChild	1	409	ribs	50	0.1222
BlackLivesMatter	1	35	ribs	4	0.1143
@FBI	1	9	ribs	1	0.1111
MorbidPupp	9	9	car_crash	1	0.1111
i-take-beast-shits	1	9	ribs	1	0.1111
Adrienne's New Man	1	27	ribs	3	0.1111
Duxbury Dave	1	1319	ribs	142	0.1077

Enough. We've all got boners and it hurts in the morning. Jenna is a hottie. Big woop.

 

[Turk February]

its the reactions @Jenna HAS GIVEN YOU TURNIP .. i don't know what you're talking about

also here's a better weighted score with an arbitrary cut off of 100 posts and 30 reactions given

@Jenna's simp list

# rib_getter	reaction_id	total_posts	reaction_type	count_	ratio_
VoodooChild	1	409	ribs	50	0.1222
Duxbury Dave	1	1319	ribs	142	0.1077
Honey Badger	1	1192	ribs	125	0.1049
Prison Enjoyer	1	953	ribs	81	0.085
SpaceEdge	1	2922	ribs	242	0.0828
RickReternal	1	1457	ribs	90	0.0618
Tagine Enthusiast	1	895	ribs	54	0.0603
bovinebrain	1	658	ribs	38	0.0578
DanMullen'sRetardedNephew	1	4702	ribs	260	0.0553
TorqueWheeler	1	6509	ribs	349	0.0536
captain_kamala	1	7560	ribs	387	0.0512
fricklefrackle	1	2272	ribs	99	0.0436
Sink Inspector	1	5208	ribs	227	0.0436
LongIslandchomper	1	1158	ribs	48	0.0415
The Pasture Pet Destroyer	1	916	ribs	38	0.0415
turdcutter	1	796	ribs	33	0.0415
Caverlock	1	1362	ribs	54	0.0396
BudDickman	1	2990	ribs	117	0.0391
admin	1	3738	ribs	142	0.038
Bin_The_Blacks	1	2029	ribs	76	0.0375

Alright. Sir. She's yours. I didn't even really love her. You bully.

 

[Torque’sHeadBump]

postmodernist

Easily a telltale sign of weak intellects. Faggots in “academia” love to pull this kind of nonsense, particularly in ancient / medieval history. It’s really insane some of the shit they come up with, like interpreting burials and whatever, or even works of literature or sculptures in gothic / Romanesque cathedrals.

I highly doubt that some mason in 1150 was thinking about queers and faggots as he was sculpting church decorations.

 

[Turk February]

Easily a telltale sign of weak intellects. Faggots in “academia” love to pull this kind of nonsense, particularly in ancient / medieval history. It’s really insane some of the shit they come up with, like interpreting burials and whatever, or even works of literature or sculptures in gothic / Romanesque cathedrals.

I highly doubt that some mason in 1150 was thinking about queers and faggots as he was sculpting church decorations.

I like "/" too, bro

 

[Torque’sHeadBump]

I like "/" too, bro

Sir, don’t do that.

 

[Jenna]

its the reactions @Jenna HAS GIVEN YOU TURNIP .. i don't know what you're talking about

also here's a better weighted score with an arbitrary cut off of 100 posts and 30 reactions given

@Jenna's simp list

# rib_getter	reaction_id	total_posts	reaction_type	count_	ratio_
VoodooChild	1	409	ribs	50	0.1222
Duxbury Dave	1	1319	ribs	142	0.1077
Honey Badger	1	1192	ribs	125	0.1049
Prison Enjoyer	1	953	ribs	81	0.085
SpaceEdge	1	2922	ribs	242	0.0828
RickReternal	1	1457	ribs	90	0.0618
Tagine Enthusiast	1	895	ribs	54	0.0603
bovinebrain	1	658	ribs	38	0.0578
DanMullen'sRetardedNephew	1	4702	ribs	260	0.0553
TorqueWheeler	1	6509	ribs	349	0.0536
captain_kamala	1	7560	ribs	387	0.0512
fricklefrackle	1	2272	ribs	99	0.0436
Sink Inspector	1	5208	ribs	227	0.0436
LongIslandchomper	1	1158	ribs	48	0.0415
The Pasture Pet Destroyer	1	916	ribs	38	0.0415
turdcutter	1	796	ribs	33	0.0415
Caverlock	1	1362	ribs	54	0.0396
BudDickman	1	2990	ribs	117	0.0391
admin	1	3738	ribs	142	0.038
Bin_The_Blacks	1	2029	ribs	76	0.0375

I'm extremely Jennarous towards the content creators as the numbers prove. Much tighter simp list than total ribs given.

 

[Turk February]

Historians seem to be moving away from that. I think you're referring to presentism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism_(literary_and_historical_analysis)

Which has generally fallen out of favor for exactly what you're saying. Using the lens of the person in that time to interpret it. I think that's called historicism

Historicism - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Backwards looking cock sucker

 

[Meownaw]

I'm extremely Jennarous towards

Can I remove a good chunk of ribs given to Jenna after this?

 

[Torque’sHeadBump]

Historians seem to be moving away from that. I think you're referring to presentism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism_(literary_and_historical_analysis)

Which has generally fallen out of favor for exactly what you're saying. Using the lens of the person in that time to interpret it. I think that's called historicism

Historicism - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

I agree. I’m more inclined to think about the past through the lens of historicism, I just was making an observation about a lot of “professors” who have actually argued in support of presentism.

I know Twitter is not real life but neither is academia, and there’s a lot of piss poor “scholars” out there who have managed to secure tenured positions for themselves arguing for presentism… At least that’s my opinion. They tend to get very defensive if they’re accused of a presentist point of view, which to me is kind of a red flag.

Ad fontes, stupid.

 

[Chive Turkey]

I agree. I’m more inclined to think about the past through the lens of historicism, I just was making an observation about a lot of “professors” who have actually argued in support of presentism.

I know Twitter is not real life but neither is academia, and there’s a lot of piss poor “scholars” out there who have managed to secure tenured positions for themselves arguing for presentism… At least that’s my opinion. They tend to get very defensive if they’re accused of a presentist point of view, which to me is kind of a red flag.

Ad fontes, stupid.

There's a bunch that get appointed through favoritism and diversity policies but thankfully they're usually limited to modern history and the cultural realm at that. You need some actual skills to do any worthwhile research of premodern history or more technical matters, and these types tend to lack them and aren't interested in those subjects much anyway. They're busy combing through 19th century work songs for signs of a gay black community or whatever while the actual researchers are left to do their own thing.

 

[guest]

If you didn't make this list odds are I hate you. NoBacon made the list ffs what excuse do the rest of you have??

You're mad at me for being funny and cool

 

[Phish]

If you didn't make this list odds are I hate you. NoBacon made the list ffs what excuse do the rest of you have??

This just isnt true @Jenna. You dont hate me….do you? :/ sniff

 

[fricklefrackle]

Easily a telltale sign of weak intellects. Faggots in “academia” love to pull this kind of nonsense, particularly in ancient / medieval history. It’s really insane some of the shit they come up with, like interpreting burials and whatever, or even works of literature or sculptures in gothic / Romanesque cathedrals.

I highly doubt that some mason in 1150 was thinking about queers and faggots as he was sculpting church decorations.

We should all be thinking of that Savonarola cocksucka