- Forum Clout
- 20,696
Starfleet actually has protocols for time travel, number one being 'don't tell anyone you're from the fucking future'.
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Starfleet actually has protocols for time travel, number one being 'don't tell anyone you're from the fucking future'.
Not as popular as that Walmart show. Superstore or whatever. They go nuts for that shit.Star Trek will be a popular channel choice in the county jail rec room.
The number of times @Lucyfer and @Riccardo Bosi have upvoted each other (or himself) would be pretty funny.Idnk what weird stats you guys want.
Quiet you.holy FUCK he is tanked. i think a welfare check should be called in!
What you fail to realize is Pat decides what words (and everything else) mean, sweet summer child.But then he says shit like "there is only one side to every story: the truth" so I have no idea what he's really thinking. He ignores the basic reasoning that an individual can reinterpret something to make sense of it based on their own personal experience which is what allows for these fanfiction retcons to exist in an academic sphere in the first place. It's the fundamental logic that underpins his entire alleged political ideology and worldview but he is too stupid to grasp the nuance. In his mind the matrix was always about trannies, child. All the religious symbolism from the first three movies doesn't count any more because the truth is whatever Michel Foodcourt over here decides it to be.
Yeah, the entire point was to show an idealized future in which there is no scarcity or bigotry or whatever, and mankind has devoted itself to bringing others into the fold willingly and enlightening them. Every other episode was some kind of moral or philosophical conundrum.You're actually wrong about that. The diversity of TOS was very deliberate as Roddenberry wanted to show a future where every human got along with each other. That's also why they included a Russian on the crew, because of the cold war. Something they'd never do these days of course.
Exactly. He also completely misses the difference between reading something in a way that might comfort you or connect you to something with stating it as absolute fact. If a mental patient watches The Matrix and finds some comfort in the movie by equating it with their own experience then that's great. That's what art is supposed to do. If that tranny then goes on Twitter and insists that The Matrix was always a trans allegory and was 100% about the director wanting to be a woman and they cast Keanu because of his ambiguous racial makeup so fuck you nazis then they're just wrong. Pat is, as usual, wrong about almost all of this stuff but he will, also as usual, fight you on it like he owes you $50,000+.He sees people with educations reinterpreting old works through postmodernist lenses, like how Iago can be read as secretly gay for Othello without entirely fucking up the rest of the play, or that James and the Giant Peach can be read as an allegory for learning how to be a dyke, and he thinks he can do it too, like a monkey swinging a hammer because he saw a human do it once.
But then he says shit like "there is only one side to every story: the truth" so I have no idea what he's really thinking. He ignores the basic reasoning that an individual can reinterpret something to make sense of it based on their own personal experience which is what allows for these fanfiction retcons to exist in an academic sphere in the first place. It's the fundamental logic that underpins his entire alleged political ideology and worldview but he is too stupid to grasp the nuance. In his mind the matrix was always about trannies, child. All the religious symbolism from the first three movies doesn't count any more because the truth is whatever Michel Foodcourt over here decides it to be.
Rick had a tweet saying Rachel Maddow was not the lefts version of tucker or other similar pundits and that she was very objective in her opinions.Not related but I’ve never seen someone genuinely long for more Rachel Maddow. I didn’t know that was a desire people could have.
View attachment 143218
Didnt she cry during her broadcast when trump was elected lolRick had a tweet saying Rachel Maddow was not the lefts version of tucker or other similar pundits and that she was very objective in her opinions.
Yeah, but it wasn't the driving force that it's made out to be. You people are rewriting history to make it sound like Roddenberry created Star Trek simply to have a diverse cast, and that simply isn't true. But being in a far flung future, it made sense to depict a society that was post-war and post-discrimination.You're actually wrong about that. The diversity of TOS was very deliberate as Roddenberry wanted to show a future where every human got along with each other. That's also why they included a Russian on the crew, because of the cold war. Something they'd never do these days of course.
I can't wrap my head around what a stupid man he is. It's mindboggling.Exactly. He also completely misses the difference between reading something in a way that might comfort you or connect you to something with stating it as absolute fact. If a mental patient watches The Matrix and finds some comfort in the movie by equating it with their own experience then that's great. That's what art is supposed to do. If that tranny then goes on Twitter and insists that The Matrix was always a trans allegory and was 100% about the director wanting to be a woman and they cast Keanu because of his ambiguous racial makeup so fuck you nazis then they're just wrong. Pat is, as usual, wrong about almost all of this stuff but he will, also as usual, fight you on it like he owes you $50,000+.
She was literally able to weasel out of a lawsuit because she claimed she was entertainer and no one should take her opinions seriously.Rick had a tweet saying Rachel Maddow was not the lefts version of tucker or other similar pundits and that she was very objective in her opinions.
Patrick and most of the left's cognitive dissonance is best reflected in their support of Muslims/Islam. Most Muslims hate fags, dislike women and they're the furthest thing from being progressive as it gets.I can't wrap my head around what a stupid man he is. It's mindboggling.
The Matrix one is so weird, because you might think that he's arguing for the idea that the social value of any given work of fiction isn't restricted to initial authorial intent, and that things can be reinterpreted through different societal lenses to gain more or less relevancy or symbolic poignancy but I think he's actually doubling down on the importance of authorial intent, and trying to say that all interpretation is to be based on the whims of the personal political views of the director, no matter what their content depicts, who is viewing it or what context its viewed in. He is such a facist little authoritarian. He couldnt be more at odds with his own chosen sociopolitical paradigms if he tried. He just sees things done by smart people on his side of the political fence, tries to copy them and fucks it up in some fundamental way every single time. He pities blacks for being inferior, needs to protect gays for being faggots, hates all bigots, and now he's trying to argue that individual truth is truth, but only his.
here's your top given .... quid pro quo..
rib_getter reaction_type count_ IGotATreeOnMyHouse85 ribs 532 TorqueWheeler ribs 410 captain_kamala ribs 392 Slackjawed Cow ribs 385 Meownaw ribs 361 DanMullen'sRetardedNephew ribs 263 SpaceEdge ribs 260 Sink Inspector ribs 238 Harry Powell ribs 224 Patreeky ribs 223 admin ribs 203 RobertMewler ribs 195 NoBacon ribs 183 Sue Lightning ribs 166 Duxbury Dave ribs 158 Honey Badger ribs 144 chocolatehellhole ribs 140 HH Brother ribs 133 McGowan6 ribs 127 Salted Earth Truffle ribs 124
@Meownaw
rib_getter reaction_type count_ Slackjawed Cow ribs 5123 IGotATreeOnMyHouse85 ribs 3849 Stent ribs 3280 Patreeky ribs 3077 Lucyfer ribs 2957 Maxheinie's Old Stinkers ribs 2598 HotDogJoe ribs 2330 DanMullen'sRetardedNephew ribs 2282 Gay Faggot. ribs 2076 Sue Lightning ribs 1942 Dummy Gaynuts ribs 1914 BonnieMcFarlaneMe2 ribs 1911 Cuphead ribs 1876 TorqueWheeler ribs 1865 Harry Powell ribs 1862 TheGhostOfAbeVigoda ribs 1846 RobertMewler ribs 1836 Lamont & Tonelli ribs 1830 Brooke Shields ribs 1780 McGowan6 ribs 1779
This is just going to be a list of the people with the most posts though essentially. I'd need a way to weight (heh...) these vs the number of posts they have. I suck at stats though. There's a few ways to slice the data. It could be something like percentage of the rib giver's total ribs. The inverse also makes sense. A percentage of all ribs received were from X user.
Another way could be as a function of their total posts as I mentioned. This seems to intuitively be right, but as I said I'm bad at stats.
this post is brought to you by autismtm
Don't patronize me. Just say I'm not your favorite. I can take it.You don't have a lot of total posts, that's the issue with just a simple function. Where's fat jonah hill from that baseball movie when you need him?
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/