• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

Suetonius

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
119,090
IMG_4738.jpeg

I’m so sorry, Judge Stadtmuller.
 

TorqueWheeler

An enormous amount of muscle.
Forum Clout
78,545
I just love how everyone he is up against in this case is black. Pat the closeted racist will be seething when he gets put in his place by both a black cop and a black attorney.
Pat is also famous for his tolerance of women talking back to him. Two jigs and a chick giving him the business will be absolutely glorious.
 
G

guest

Guest
I think some people are getting some confused by the latest court update. This is Magistrate Judge William Duffin, who will not be presiding over this case:

1000007412.jpg


From what I'm gathering, if all parties agree to it then a trial can be held in front of what's called a magistrate judge, which sounds like it basically makes the trial go faster. It appears that the City of Wisconsin is declining to move forward with a magistrate judge process, resulting in the case being assigned to a different judge.

I'm sure there's good strategic reasons to do so, one being it effectively lengthens the trial process. Another reason could be because Judge William Duffin appears to have presided over one of the "Making a Murderer" cases, although it's unclear if Patrick's lawyers were involved with this specific case: [URL]https://heavy.com/news/2016/08/william-duffin-judge-brendan-dassey-conviction-overturned-release-magistrate-wisconsin-steven-avery-making-a-murderer/[/URL]

I'm not a lawyer I just play one here in the forums, if someone more knowledgeable wants to chime in I'm all ears (or I guess eyes because, you know).
 

TorquieTwoBeers

Forum Clout
30,338
I don't know if you're making a specific point here, but I would not read anything into this. He's 82. It makes sense for him to have stringent measures in place to protect him. A stiff breeze could kill him.

Also I wonder if we'll have another Judge Fudge scenario here, where the judge is so old and out of touch that he barely understands any of the proceedings before him. A lot of the evidence against Pat is internet-based, like him tweeting that he's not scared. Not sure if an 82 year old even understands social media, much less archived links.
 

Honoria

Forum Clout
8,331
I don't know if you're making a specific point here, but I would not read anything into this. He's 82. It makes sense for him to have stringent measures in place to protect him. A stiff breeze could kill him.

Also I wonder if we'll have another Judge Fudge scenario here, where the judge is so old and out of touch that he barely understands any of the proceedings before him. A lot of the evidence against Pat is internet-based, like him tweeting that he's not scared. Not sure if an 82 year old even understands social media, much less archived links.

I think it won't matter if the case is strong and presented well. Also might increase the likelihood of him thinking it makes no sense and throwing it out, I can't see an old judge who could have retired by now randomly ruling against the city.
 
N

NIGGER_ANNIHILATOR_1488

Guest
View attachment 188920
View attachment 188921
Hates rapists and pedophiles
View attachment 188922
Hates arsonists

View attachment 188924
Hates COVID loan defrauders
Ho ho ho holey shit. Please God let the Tomlinson-Robinson get popped for PPP fraud.

Prediction: MPD is going to send out their first reply, and Tomlinson-Robinson will withdraw their suit, then go on a media tour and whine that the big money MPD are fighting them instead of giving them millions of taxpayer dollars.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
82,880
I think some people are getting some confused by the latest court update. This is Magistrate Judge William Duffin, who will not be presiding over this case:

View attachment 188929

From what I'm gathering, if all parties agree to it then a trial can be held in front of what's called a magistrate judge, which sounds like it basically makes the trial go faster. It appears that the City of Wisconsin is declining to move forward with a magistrate judge process, resulting in the case being assigned to a different judge.

I'm sure there's good strategic reasons to do so, one being it effectively lengthens the trial process. Another reason could be because Judge William Duffin appears to have presided over one of the "Making a Murderer" cases, although it's unclear if Patrick's lawyers were involved with this specific case: https://heavy.com/news/2016/08/will...ate-wisconsin-steven-avery-making-a-murderer/

I'm not a lawyer I just play one here in the forums, if someone more knowledgeable wants to chime in I'm all ears (or I guess eyes because, you know).
Magistrate seems to be similar to the pro tem in state courts.
 
Forum Clout
46,374
Has Fatso posted anything about this latest lawsuit on his social media other than telling everyone who mentions it they're going to prison? He's has a surprising amount of restraint this time around. He must have been seriously scolded by his new lawyers and his wife to shut the fuck up about this lawsuit until it's over.

This new, extremely experienced judge taking over is a bad sign for Fatso and the wife. He might want to make an example out of the Fatsos and drag this out to set a precedent for future grifters trying to wrongfully sue the police. He also might dismiss the case with prejudice and admonish the Fatsos and their lawyers for wasting valuable court time and taxpayer money with this frivolous lawsuit.

Regardless, the grifting Fatsos have to be livid that one of Pests found the lawsuit.
 
G

guest

Guest
It's fun to ponder what Pat's lawyers legal strategy is going to be here. If it was only being held in front of a judge I think they'd lose, because it would boil down to mostly about police procedure. As it is, the lawsuit reads like a soap opera, but if Pat's lawyers start going too deep into Internet stuff, the judge and jury are going to be like "wtf is this."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top