Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

[WifeStoreWill]

Hopefully if it comes to settlement it’ll be some paltry, 5-figure sum - a chunk of the which is owed to his representation, a chunk of which towards his previous legal debts, and the rest may as well be lit on fire.

Still a W, I guess?

 

[TorquieTwoBeers]

Hopefully if it comes to settlement it’ll be some paltry, 5-figure sum - a chunk of the which is owed to his representation, a chunk of which towards his previous legal debts, and the rest may as well be lit on fire.

Still a W, I guess?

I originally thought it was going to be a mid-five figure sum, but the more I think about it, I think it'll be $10,000 or less. Or at least that's what I think they'll offer. It's a small amount, but it shows the judge they're trying to move this thing along. Maybe with a stipulation that the police department did nothing wrong. Of course, Pat will reject this and piss off the judge and keep pressing for a trial. That is, if his representation responds at all.

Pat's case has very little merit, but it probably costs more to the city to keep litigating this thing than to offer a small amount of money to just make it disappear. Hope I'm wrong and it goes to trial somehow.

 

[Guest]

I originally thought it was going to be a mid-five figure sum, but the more I think about it, I think it'll be $10,000 or less. Or at least that's what I think they'll offer. It's a small amount, but it shows the judge they're trying to move this thing along. Maybe with a stipulation that the police department did nothing wrong. Of course, Pat will reject this and piss off the judge and keep pressing for a trial. That is, if his representation responds at all.

Pat's case has very little merit, but it probably costs more to the city to keep litigating this thing than to offer a small amount of money to just make it disappear. Hope I'm wrong and it goes to trial somehow.

And hopefully Lyndon never forgets and never forgives.

 

[FranksWirecutters]

I originally thought it was going to be a mid-five figure sum, but the more I think about it, I think it'll be $10,000 or less. Or at least that's what I think they'll offer. It's a small amount, but it shows the judge they're trying to move this thing along. Maybe with a stipulation that the police department did nothing wrong. Of course, Pat will reject this and piss off the judge and keep pressing for a trial. That is, if his representation responds at all.

Pat's case has very little merit, but it probably costs more to the city to keep litigating this thing than to offer a small amount of money to just make it disappear. Hope I'm wrong and it goes to trial somehow.

I don't see why they'd offer anything and also start sending code enforcement to his place constantly instead. I'd bombard the neighborhood with code violations and wink wink that someone at 2611 might have called them all in, if I was the City.

 

[guest]

Sue said 25 x 100 is a million

 

[Lard Glug]

You people who think the City won’t fight tooth and nail on this and will try to settle are insane (sorry Fez).

City Attorneys live for this kind of shit. When their usual job entails proof reading contracts and other paper pushing nonsense, they love fighting to keep the city from having a precedent set to have to pay out anything.

 

[FranksWirecutters]

You people who think the City won’t fight tooth and nail on this and will try to settle are insane (sorry Fez).

City Attorneys live for this kind of shit. When their usual job entails proof reading contracts and other paper pushing nonsense, they love fighting to keep the city from having a precedent set to have to pay out anything.

That's what I'm saying. There's no reason to settle. He just pissed them off and they'll rezone his lot to heavy industrial and expropriate for pennies. What city isn't corrupt at this point?

Edit. I can't see them going into this with a I'm so sorry Mr. Robinson, here's 20 million dollars.

 

[kingship75]

A lot of the evidence against Pat is internet-based, like him tweeting that he's not scared. Not sure if an 82 year old even understands social media, much less archived links.

What about live links?

 

[firstimelongtime]

You people who think the City won’t fight tooth and nail on this and will try to settle are insane (sorry Fez).

City Attorneys live for this kind of shit. When their usual job entails proof reading contracts and other paper pushing nonsense, they love fighting to keep the city from having a precedent set to have to pay out anything.

Oh, I want him to all or nothing. Just trying to find the bright side if they just swat(t) him off like a mosquito.

Then again, there are all bright sides, no matter the outcome. It’s Pat. As long as he stays Pat, he’ll find some may to make it hilarious.

 

[TorquieTwoBeers]

You people who think the City won’t fight tooth and nail on this and will try to settle are insane (sorry Fez).

City Attorneys live for this kind of shit. When their usual job entails proof reading contracts and other paper pushing nonsense, they love fighting to keep the city from having a precedent set to have to pay out anything.

I mean, I hope you're right but cities run on a budget. Throwing $5,000-$10,000 to settle a case involving officers showing up multiple times to one residence vs. spending a lot of time and money on a protracted case where they are not guaranteed to win (you never know what a jury is going to conclude), which would put a giant stain on the city and the police department, is a no-brainer.

The judge here is even ordering them to come together to try to reach a settlement. imo, the smart thing for the city is to offer a small settlement with an admission that the police were not at fault and end it. Even considering how retarded Pat's case is.

 

[firstimelongtime]

Any chance of Pat and MKE, after the initial meet and confer, agree to go head-to-head in televised arbitration?

 

[Faggot Boqposter]

I’ll post this knowing full well >1% will actually watch it, but the Milwaukee mayor is like a character out of the Boondocks. She’s so absurd it defies parody. She speaks in Ebonics and just blatantly uses tax money for nail extensions, first class fights, basketball tickets, etc

Good video but she’s the mayor of negro infested shithole suburb of Chicago not Milwaukee.

 

[Honey Badger]

Good video but she’s the mayor of negro infested shithole suburb of Chicago not Milwaukee.

I deleted that so fast before anyone could ridicule me and you still beat me to it

 

[Faggot Boqposter]

I deleted that so fast before anyone could ridicule me and you still beat me to it

And now your mistake lives on forever, badger. Enjoy it. I know we will.

 

[firstimelongtime]

I was about to ask "there's no way Milwaukee has a gem like her. Like the one running those two podunk Illinois townships".

She's been my obsession for the past month. Woah. Wiiiild. The expenses, the dumb civic projects (skating rink!), the 24/7 police "security" detail, DJs at gov't meetings, the village's vehicle loans maybe defaulting... making it so that she makes 200k+, but if she leaves the post the next sucker makes 24k...

 

[Prison Enjoyer]

Patrick's Mugshot for DV, DC & Death Threats on X: "@stealthygeek @NeutralbutKind @mixthedeadcat @StealthyZarbon3 @MisuseOfMeat @stealthytoilet You were not able to resist Lyndon with your meagre, lesser strength. You were not able to stop him puttin

ghostarchive.org

Patrick S. Tomlinson on X: "@stealthymugshot @DoctorBadger_MD @yokai_yoshiya @Fubar19811 @SethAbramson No, stalker. They didn't. But you will be. Enjoy prison." / X | Ghostarchive

ghostarchive.org

 

[Harry's Enticer]

Lol you funsters can’t even get my incorrect math right…I said 125 x 100 was 100,000. Not 200,000. This will be telephoned to eventually “Sue said 25 x 100 is a million!”

Retard

Explain to me in your least retarded understanding what the role of a judge in the legal system is

 

[Guest]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://ghostarchive.org/archive/m2m3c[/URL]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://ghostarchive.org/archive/wYtzy[/URL]

I wonder if Lyndon would autograph a photo

 

[Suetonius]

Explain to me in your least retarded understanding what the role of a judge in the legal system is

Well I’ll just focus on criminal law. They preside over a trial. They control the trial…for lack of a better word. The judge…judges. If a lawyer argues opposing counsel is say, asking a question irrelevant to the charges, the judge decides if that objection is sustained or overruled. This can also be in regards to evidentiary matters like what can or can’t be shown to a jury. If it’s a jury trial the jury deliberates and comes back with a sentencing. Based on all the evidence and the sentencing the judge then decides the appropriate sentence or, rarely and under specific circumstances, overturns the verdict of the jury all together.

Edit: Verdict not sentencing fawwwk!

 

[Harry's Enticer]

Well I’ll just focus on criminal law. They preside over a trial. They control the trial…for lack of a better word. The judge…judges. If a lawyer argues opposing counsel is say, asking a question irrelevant to the charges, the judge decides if that objection is sustained or overruled. This can also be in regards to evidentiary matters like what can or can’t be shown to a jury. If it’s a jury trial the jury deliberates and comes back with a sentencing. Based on all the evidence and the sentencing the judge then decides the appropriate sentence or, rarely and under specific circumstances, overturns the verdict of the jury all together.

Edit: Verdict not sentencing fawwwk!

ok now explain why you posted this: