• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

Racist Google Intern

Racist Google Intern

Please watch the Itchy and Scratchy Friends Hour!
‎
‎
Forum Clout
23,013
Cowny ahh mutha fucka always says the line even when you tell him
Screenshot_20240305_213525_Brave.jpg
 
C

CompoundBasement

‎
‎
Forum Clout
42,998
The Pest said:
He said he always has to reply to correct the record. But he isnt correcting Any record there lol. So fat.
Click to expand...
He seriously thinks every reply from him to a troll is another "felony charge" against his troll.

He has consistently proven he does not understand laws or legal matters at all. Everything he thinks he's an expert on is his own interpretation which is more retarded than retarded.
 
G

guest

Guest
CompoundBasement said:
He seriously thinks every reply from him to a troll is another "felony charge" against his troll.

He has consistently proven he does not understand laws or legal matters at all. Everything he thinks he's an expert on is his own interpretation which is more retarded than retarded.
Click to expand...
I LOVE how in the BDA court recording when the judge calls out Patrick for threatening BDA, deleting his text messages, and then perjuring himself on the stand (i.e. lying) Patrick's response was "I don't remember sending that (text message). What I do remember telling him (BDA) was to stop contacting me and that everytime he did, he was then committing a felony" -- or something to that effect. The judge didn't even remark on that...
 
PogromStallone

PogromStallone

Give Me Some Money
‎
‎
Forum Clout
16,435
CoomByYa said:
I LOVE how in the BDA court recording when the judge calls out Patrick for threatening BDA, deleting his text messages, and then perjuring himself on the stand (i.e. lying) Patrick's response was "I don't remember sending that (text message). What I do remember telling him (BDA) was to stop contacting me and that everytime he did, he was then committing a felony" -- or something to that effect. The judge didn't even remark on that...
Click to expand...
Actually he said that he didn't send that text and that they could look at his phone for proof he didn't(he deleted it). Then BDA said he did send it and they could look at his phone for proof. That's when he changed his answer to "I don't remember sending it".
 
G

guest

Guest
PogromStallone said:
Actually he said that he didn't send that text and that they could look at his phone for proof he didn't(he deleted it). Then BDA said he did send it and they could look at his phone for proof. That's when he changed his answer to "I don't remember sending it".
Click to expand...
Right right.... my point though is the judge wasn't at all interested in Pat's diatribe on "felony text messaging" and didn't even comment on it... but BDA surely must've committed a felony by engaging in a text chat with Patrick, Patrick said so himself!
 
S

stealthygeek

‎
‎
Forum Clout
50,853
PogromStallone said:
Actually he said that he didn't send that text and that they could look at his phone for proof he didn't(he deleted it). Then BDA said he did send it and they could look at his phone for proof. That's when he changed his answer to "I don't remember sending it".
Click to expand...
I think Rick also said something like, "Sir, you are simply lying" to BDA right before he whipped out his phone and proved that he wasn't.
 
WifeStoreWill

WifeStoreWill

The WifeStore called, they’re running out of gooks
‎
Forum Clout
32,786
PogromStallone said:
Actually he said that he didn't send that text and that they could look at his phone for proof he didn't(he deleted it). Then BDA said he did send it and they could look at his phone for proof. That's when he changed his answer to "I don't remember sending it".
Click to expand...
Can you remove individual texts from a conversation on android phones? I’ve never had one.
 
WifeStoreWill

WifeStoreWill

The WifeStore called, they’re running out of gooks
‎
Forum Clout
32,786
Honoria said:
Also BDA got to show the judge his phone but for Pat it was "It's on your PHONE?". Maybe if someone hadn't been rude in the first 4 minutes of the hearing the judge would have been a bit nicer!
Click to expand...
It’s crazy that they allow that to be used as evidence in court since it would be so easy to fake it. Having it printed out seems even worse.
 
DominusOdium

DominusOdium

Well, somebody had to be.
‎
‎
Forum Clout
40,170
CompoundBasement said:
He seriously thinks every reply from him to a troll is another "felony charge" against his troll.

He has consistently proven he does not understand laws or legal matters at all. Everything he thinks he's an expert on is his own interpretation which is more retarded than retarded.
Click to expand...
I don't even know where he got the idea that replying in public, to a public post or comment, is some actionable crime. If this was true, why isn't every single person on X in jail for saying the same sort of things to presidents, media figures, celebrities and normal people on the opposing political side?

He's doing the equivalent of coming to a public street corner every day and arguing with a guy who insults him every time he sees him, for hours every day and then trying to equate it to the same guy showing up in his house's window to scream obscenities at him.

The texts and stuff are different but this obsession with stlaker childing people on X makes him look unserious and mentally ill to even people who'd likely support him, if they have any sense at all. Hence he's stuck with bottom feeder retards like Nokes and Snax, has no career options in any direction and gained basically no new following or support from his media tour. Oh man, I want to go help that guy....wait he posts 200 times a day threatening these people? Uh. I'll go help an actual victim.
 
G

guest

Guest
Honoria said:
Also BDA got to show the judge his phone but for Pat it was "It's on your PHONE?". Maybe if someone hadn't been rude in the first 4 minutes of the hearing the judge would have been a bit nicer!
Click to expand...
It's understandable that BDA wouldn't have them printed since he only found out about the hearing shortly before. Patrick filed for the restraining order and couldn't be bothered to show up with much of anything (witnesses, printouts, etc). Just about the only thing Patrick did show up with was a cunty attitude.
 
Lard Glug

Lard Glug

Lard Glug contains neither lard nor glug.
‎
Forum Clout
3,733
CoomByYa said:
It's understandable that BDA wouldn't have them printed since he only found out about the hearing shortly before. Patrick filed for the restraining order and couldn't be bothered to show up with much of anything (witnesses, printouts, etc). Just about the only thing Patrick did show up with was a cunty attitude.
Click to expand...
He thought he was going to be heard, you see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top