Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

[quasi101]

IF this gets to trial, the defense attorney is going to spend an hour or so really ramping up the questions about how terrified Fat is/was. And then he is ask "Mr Tomlinson, you're terrified for your life, but more importantly you're terrified for your wife's life, why do you go to the bar AFTER TWO VISITS PREVIOSULY IN ONE DAY?" The contempt in his voice is going to trigger Pat to become extra argumentative. Retard witnesses have this inability to admit stupid actions or inconsistencies they have to excuse EVERYTHING.

Reminder that while you can plead the 5th in a civil trial. If you do the jury is instructed that they can draw an adverse conclusion from it. Unlike in criminal.

 

[firstimelongtime]

Reminder that while you can plead the 5th in a civil trial. If you do the jury is instructed that they can draw an adverse conclusion from it. Unlike in criminal.

a. I did not know that. Huh.
b. It's a moot point, anyhow, after decades of major-network-prime-time dramas have programmed people to believe that enacting one's fifth amendment protection is an admission of guilt. Among other idiocy.

 

[Honeycomb Hideout]

Imagine if this lawsuit is the first "weird news" topic on Thursday

 

[quasi101]

a. I did not know that. Huh.
b. It's a moot point, anyhow, after decades of major-network-prime-time dramas have programmed people to believe that enacting one's fifth amendment protection is an admission of guilt. Among other idiocy.

Pleading The Fifth Amendment And Adverse Inferences In Civil Litigation

Updated, June 12, 2019 Ken over at Popehat has been chronicling the implosion of Prenda Law, a law firm that, on paper, represented copyright holders

www.litigationandtrial.com

Second, although in a criminal procedure, the court must instruct the jury that it cannot draw an inference of guilt from a defendant’s failure to testify about facts relevant to his case, Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), in civil cases, “the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them.” Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976).

 

[quasi101]

I am confident fatso wasn't aware he couldn't plead the 5th. if his retarded looking attorneys tried to explain it to him I can guarantee piggy boy "simply"ignored it. .

 

[RoxburyRick]

Reminder that while you can plead the 5th in a civil trial. If you do the jury is instructed that they can draw an adverse conclusion from it. Unlike in criminal.

Piggy should just say "I wasn't thinking clearly" or something to that effect but he's too stupid and argumentative. He can't let the idiots, which is funny because he's an idiot and always loses

 

[SFWA liaison]

"Their words fell on deaf ears"

same energy:

"I pleaded with her, begged for the life we’d built together, and for the life growing in her belly. But if she heard any of it, she didn’t care."

 

[quasi101]

Piggy should just say "I wasn't thinking clearly" or something to that effect but he's too stupid and argumentative. He can't let the idiots, which is funny because he's an idiot and always loses

It would be like if a few good men were 3 minutes long.

"I have here a statement from Dan mullen saying you just let the police arrest you without putting up a fight or resisting becuase you are too weak and scared. "

 

[NoBacon]

What’s the game theory behind naming an individual officer as well as the city? It feels like there’s no benefit to it.

I know Patrick is a retard but I’m trying to understand any reasoning behind it.

 

[quasi101]

What’s the game theory behind naming an individual officer as well as the city? It feels like there’s no benefit to it.

I know Patrick is a retard but I’m trying to understand any reasoning behind it.

The same reason that the fat one refused to remove quasi despite it being obvious that would lead to sanctions. ODD, OCD, OCPD, but most importantly BMI.

 

[Uncle J’s Sink Emporium]

What’s the game theory behind naming an individual officer as well as the city? It feels like there’s no benefit to it.

I know Patrick is a retard but I’m trying to understand any reasoning behind it.

He wants to punish that guy and get money from him specifically

 

[NoBacon]

The same reason that the fat one refused to remove quasi despite it being obvious that would lead to sanctions. ODD, OCD, OCPD, but most importantly BMI.

Playing devils advocate, is there any benefit to doing it?

I get in reality it’s just pig man being spiteful and trying to fuck with a perceived enemy as he did with quasi but he must think it presents avenues for winning in his own fat mind, what do we think those could be? I’m not sure why I’m asking, he obviously doesn’t think about it at all.

 

[Pogo-The-Clown]

Which will net them more money his shitty tiny Tim book or suing the City of Milwaukee? too bad Jon is still not around to witness this

 

[quasi101]

Playing devils advocate, is there any benefit to doing it?

I get in reality it’s just pig man being spiteful and trying to fuck with a perceived enemy as he did with quasi but he must think it presents avenues for winning in his own fat mind, what do we think those could be? I’m not sure why I’m asking, he obviously doesn’t think about it at all.

There's no immediate benefit that I can think of but I'm not a federal judge.

Let me go ask my father, who is a retired federal judge, I said on a comedy forum with a disclaimer that people make jokes here.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

Reminder that while you can plead the 5th in a civil trial. If you do the jury is instructed that they can draw an adverse conclusion from it. Unlike in criminal.

Well one this we know for sure. Pat wants to be heard. He has never been able to keep quiet.

 

[NoBacon]

Which will net them more money his shitty tiny Tim book or suing the City of Milwaukee? too bad Jon is still not around to witness this

The 500 dollars tiny Tim in space makes will be a higher number than 0

 

[MonsterSteve]

IF this gets to trial, the defense attorney is going to spend an hour or so really ramping up the questions about how terrified Fat is/was. And then he is ask "Mr Tomlinson, you're terrified for your life, but more importantly you're terrified for your wife's life, why do you go to the bar AFTER TWO VISITS PREVIOSULY IN ONE DAY?" The contempt in his voice is going to trigger Pat to become extra argumentative. Retard witnesses have this inability to admit stupid actions or inconsistencies they have to excuse EVERYTHING.

It wouldn’t even get that far. They would just submit the 100 tweets of him saying up until yesterday that he doesn’t fear the “stlaker children”.

 

[NoBacon]

There's no immediate benefit that I can think of but I'm not a federal judge.

Let me go ask my father, who is a retired federal judge, I said on a comedy forum with a disclaimer that people make jokes here.

You’d think he’d learn and not marry two things together again like he did with quasi, but he hasn’t learned how to eat salad in 45 years

 

[SFWA liaison]

Evans emasculated Pat, made him throw a fit, and now Pat wants revenge. He's a simple-minded 1.2 GPA retard, don't look for more complex explanations.

He might also use the lawsuit as an excuse to e-beg, but ultimately it's about being a FFWBT.

 

[RickReternal]

Javier doing an update?