He heard it in a movie because he believes what happens in movies how the world works.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it.
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
- Thread starter Cumtown Fags
- Start date
G
guest
Guest
He really has no idea how to use commas
G
guest
Guest
Milwaukee PD should just say "lol remember that Dahmer fella? yea we don't like to take chances now. case dismissed"
IF this gets to trial, the defense attorney is going to spend an hour or so really ramping up the questions about how terrified Fat is/was. And then he is ask "Mr Tomlinson, you're terrified for your life, but more importantly you're terrified for your wife's life, why do you go to the bar AFTER TWO VISITS PREVIOSULY IN ONE DAY?" The contempt in his voice is going to trigger Pat to become extra argumentative. Retard witnesses have this inability to admit stupid actions or inconsistencies they have to excuse EVERYTHING.
It was probably the only officer he remembered talking to multiple times. He has to establish a pattern of behavior in order to prove his case essentially I ANAL just interested in it. He's alleging the police as a whole and that officer in particular should have known better, and violated his rights on multiple occasions.Can someone think of a good explanation on why he sued officer Deshawn separately? Besides the fact that he was butthurt because the colored fella yelled at him.
This seems like such a dumb move but then again it is Pat.
Also lets say the city wants to settle. How much is he going to get? Families of dindus shot get millions but Robinson et al are white and only had some officers saying mean things and pointing ballistic shields at them.
24h later and it is still surreal.
edit : https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/...ettle-police-lawsuits-for-200000/70520293007/
John Josiah Munoz jr lol "John J. Munoz, Jr. who alleged excessive force during a 2012 arrest ($10,000)"
City Hall: Milwaukee Spending $1.5 Million On Lawsuits, Including Two Police Conduct Cases
And another $1.5 million in settlements is pending.urbanmilwaukee.com
The cost of police misconduct in Milwaukee: $21 million – and growing
A pending wrongful imprisonment settlement could push the total payouts to settle lawsuits so far this year to $9.3 million.eu.jsonline.com
His one attorney, Odell, has some interesting appellate work in Florida. Better than I thought, but he's extremely new to private practice.
I don't think he paid for the bulk of them. I think pretty much what Torswats presented is accurate: Patrick paid for the first couple to try to frame us and then sue the MPD to recoup his losses and get media fame.
He either did this with the help of Snackie or what I think, which is that he was told so many times "Well they use vpns and tor and protonmail so we can't track them" and figured he was smarter than anybody here so he could do the same and frame us for some actual heinous shit.
Then he stopped paying because he didn't see the point for whatever reason, maybe just decided he didn't have to since it was a criminal cyber terrorist, so Torswats in revenge then used his name and number to test out his setup and new numbers before swatting other people. That pretty clearly explains stuff like the Reno hotel call. I haven't seen any proof or evidence that contradicts what Torswats said, and the FBI case against him were he would swat himself for instance lines up with the same mindset.
I imagine he thinks because he was behind nine proxies and that Torswats is caught and guilty of so much more that any chance his initial purchases are caught or brought into this is low. He's a genius, you see. Surely the MPD who didn't know what reddit was don't know how to subpoena a VPN.
No, that's when he takes is lady's pantsuit jacket off, revealing a (two-sizes-too-small) Captain America t-shirt, and launches into a triumphant speech about not letting the terrorists win.
The lawyer would be smarter than me and ask it as a yes no question. Making Pat even angrier. This is why I didn't go to law school (also the constant drinking)
I don't get involved in many court documents.
1) do you
2) really use
3) use a numbered
4) list to break up
5) sentences for legal filings?
Most of that reads like it should just be one thought instead of 1) this happened. 2) this happened. 3) this happened
To anyone wondering what all the infighting and boqposting was for, here you go
Patposting is dead. Long live Patposting
Qualified immunity is the big one. A jury essentially adjudicates what the facts are. The case can be dismissed if the judge rules, "even if all the facts are true, you lose anyway". Then theres nothing for the court to do. The state has to submit a motion to dismiss claiming that.
If it gets a little further in the process then they can Submit an msj (motion for summary judgment) , which essentially says the same thing. An msj is more stating after discovery "there are no facts in dispute here". In that case the judge can rule on the law as there's nothing for a jury to do.
3 Reasons Why You Should Number Pleading Paragraphs - FindLaw
One of the most important rules when it comes to drafting a pleading, or any document that will (or could) get filed with the court, is not codified anywhere except in the minds of good legal writers: Keep it simple. Using concise, plain language is the new normal when it comes to legal writing...
www.findlaw.com
Reminder that while you can plead the 5th in a civil trial. If you do the jury is instructed that they can draw an adverse conclusion from it. Unlike in criminal.
a. I did not know that. Huh.
b. It's a moot point, anyhow, after decades of major-network-prime-time dramas have programmed people to believe that enacting one's fifth amendment protection is an admission of guilt. Among other idiocy.
Imagine if this lawsuit is the first "weird news" topic on Thursday
Pleading The Fifth Amendment And Adverse Inferences In Civil Litigation
Updated, June 12, 2019 Ken over at Popehat has been chronicling the implosion of Prenda Law, a law firm that, on paper, represented copyright holders
www.litigationandtrial.com
Piggy should just say "I wasn't thinking clearly" or something to that effect but he's too stupid and argumentative. He can't let the idiots, which is funny because he's an idiot and always loses