• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it.

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

kingship75

My huge-cocked pal stole my wife and PUPPIES!
Fame too. They absolutely want local news, national news, and talk shows on top of this and to become celebrities over it, and to capitalize on the fame. That's why they're also demanding a jury trial. If they just wanted a quick settlement they've probably been told all of the details of a settlement would be confidential, so they couldn't get themselves another media tour without risking breaching the terms of their settlement agreement.
This motherfucker dreams of sitting across from Bill Mahr.
 

TheGhostOfBernellTrammell

Reup on diapers tomorrow hmu
And why would you leave your wife home alone after she was swatted three times that day?
had they been swatted three times that day? If so that means that at the least he let it happen that many times that day and he left to go to the bar. Niki didn't go. This alone raises so many hilarious thoughts. Why not temporarily relocate for the night, maybe Lynne's house or another relative or friend? Did they alienate everyone with their autism? Oopsie doodles. But the kicker is really that despite all those harrowing incidents throughout the day Patrick didn't stay by Niki's side and chose to be absent of the home under repeated threat and she also chose not to go to him. Dark comedy all around.
 

MonsterSteve

Age.
to all the kiwi faggots who think that the "we're aware of the situation" is some kind of smoking gun. Assuming he didn't outright lie and fabricate that entirely. It was very likely taken out of context. Let's take a stroll down memory lane and see if the last lolsuit took anything out of context to completely change the entire meaning.

page:17 section:19


Actual text read , bolded part was removed in the complaint.

----------

page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)


Full text :


page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)


full text:



As a reminder this was approved and submitted by brinton j resto. Yes brinton j resto did indeed submit the complaint that deliberately removed parts of a sentence to change their meaning.
I forgot how much of a lying bastard Resto was. Yea let's just remove ALL context from the filing. Fucking fraudulent assholes.
 

RickReternal

I hope people Ouija you tweets after your dead
Even knowing what I know, I’m still surprised that Patrick seemingly pulled “I’m an author!” on his lawyers and wrote part of his own filing! Sure, for the pro se that made “sense” (and we’re lucky to have that amazing document) but in this case when you’ve hired actual lawyers? He’s incredible.
 
Even knowing what I know, I’m still surprised that Patrick seemingly pulled “I’m an author!” on his lawyers and wrote part of his own filing! Sure, for the pro se that made “sense” (and we’re lucky to have that amazing document) but in this case when you’ve hired actual lawyers? He’s incredible.
It's more common than people think. Arrogant clients like Fatso insist they're smarter than lawyers so they'll write their own motions, etc. and use licensed attorneys to sign off on them and file them at a reduced rate. Attorneys will change certain things which are too stupid, irrelevant, and illegal and then file them with "no promises or guarantees" on the outcomes to their clients. Most often, people like Fatso will end up losing. More reasons it's highly doubtful these attorneys are doing this for Fatso and his wife on a contingency.
 
G

guest

Guest
6973ece8e892c79bb52ca37837e8792b.png

[URL unfurl="true"]https://ghostarchive.org/archive/z8xG1[/URL]
"Your weaknesses is"
Professional author, ladies and gentlemen
 
As ridiculous as the lawsuit is, part of me thinks that it wasn't Pat swatting himself. If it was him doing it, why would he take the risk of opening it up for investigation? We know Pat is not all that bright and the odds of him being able to outsmart an entire team of law enforcement officials are extremely slim (unlike him, he's fat). He's dumb but he couldn't be that dumb.
This is the first time i've been uncertain that FAT is self-swatting, because like you said, he'd have to be the biggest retard ever to file this suit if he's been doing it. But on the other hand, everything we've seen so far suggests that he might just be the biggest retard ever.
 
I bet Jackass thinks she's going to get a chunk of that one million.

Don't forget that she's dedicated a year of her life to connecting the dots between the swattings and the cybercult death stalking Patrick. The first arrest has already been made (for which she was marked for death).

I'm sure Pat will offer her, what... ten percent?
 
Top