• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
82,767
to all the kiwi faggots who think that the "we're aware of the situation" is some kind of smoking gun. Assuming he didn't outright lie and fabricate that entirely. It was very likely taken out of context. Let's take a stroll down memory lane and see if the last lolsuit took anything out of context to completely change the entire meaning.

page:17 section:19
"On or about January 20, 2020, Defendant John Doe 37, pseudonymously posting as
“Caverlock,” wrote “Patrick Tomlinson understands that desperate times call for desperate
measures, including beating women,” and listed Plaintiff’s full name, address, residential unit, and date of birth under the word “Dox” at the following URL: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/patrick-sean-tomlinson-stealthygeek.65412/."

Actual text read , bolded part was removed in the complaint.
Patrick Tomlinson understands that desperate times call for desperate measures, including beating women. Sometimes you really do need to beat women, but only if they are wearing a MAGA hat; then, yes, it is acceptable to beat women."
----------

page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)
"Be sure to click Report Abuse on that one positive review;”

Full text :
"Be sure to click Report Abuse on that one positive review. He received a free copy and miraculously loves it? I don't buy it. Screams ""illegitimate review"" to me."

page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)
“Heads up, Barnes and Noble has a profanity filter.”

full text:
"Heads up, Barnes and Noble has a profanity filter and doesn't allow you to type the ship "Chusexx"


As a reminder this was approved and submitted by brinton j resto. Yes brinton j resto did indeed submit the complaint that deliberately removed parts of a sentence to change their meaning.
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
82,767
Brinton j resto also made this egregious and possible sanctionable error,

On or around September 16, 2020, Plaintiff received several harassing telephone phone calls from Defendants John Does 1-60 that included callers suggesting he kill himself. Defendant John Doe 29, pseudonymously posting as “SpaceEdge,” described the nature of the phone calls being made to Plaintiff (e.g., “kill yourself”) on the onaforums.net website at the following URL: https://onaforums.net/forum/literary- criticism/163366-spaceedge-is-brining-the-heat/page2.
However the link was to this voicemail where it was in fact Patrick S Tomlinson who said "kill yourself"

 

chewtoyrapist

Strong. Confident.
Forum Clout
17,876
to all the kiwi faggots who think that the "we're aware of the situation" is some kind of smoking gun. Assuming he didn't outright lie and fabricate that entirely. It was very likely taken out of context. Let's take a stroll down memory lane and see if the last lolsuit took anything out of context to completely change the entire meaning.

page:17 section:19


Actual text read , bolded part was removed in the complaint.

----------

page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)


Full text :


page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)


full text:



As a reminder this was approved and submitted by brinton j resto. Yes brinton j resto did indeed submit the complaint that deliberately removed parts of a sentence to change their meaning.
As a Professional Author, Patrick decides what words and phrases mean.
 

Prison Enjoyer

Status: Enjoying Prison! 😁
Forum Clout
42,384
Ribs
cb62a81b174f51ddf5667c50f69c8300.png
 

Leonard Rhomberg

Who are you gonna replace me with?
Forum Clout
18,052
to all the kiwi faggots who think that the "we're aware of the situation" is some kind of smoking gun. Assuming he didn't outright lie and fabricate that entirely. It was very likely taken out of context. Let's take a stroll down memory lane and see if the last lolsuit took anything out of context to completely change the entire meaning.

page:17 section:19


Actual text read , bolded part was removed in the complaint.

----------

page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)


Full text :


page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)


full text:



As a reminder this was approved and submitted by brinton j resto. Yes brinton j resto did indeed submit the complaint that deliberately removed parts of a sentence to change their meaning.
1709351365694.gif
 
Forum Clout
46,356
All courts (except maybe family court) are open to the public in the US. Even the Supreme Court. You might not be able to record video or even audio, but you can attend.
Correct. Video and audio recording equipment are not permitted in Federal Courts. Don't even risk it. Federal Courts don't tolerate it and you don't want Feds after you.
 
Forum Clout
46,356
to all the kiwi faggots who think that the "we're aware of the situation" is some kind of smoking gun. Assuming he didn't outright lie and fabricate that entirely. It was very likely taken out of context. Let's take a stroll down memory lane and see if the last lolsuit took anything out of context to completely change the entire meaning.

page:17 section:19


Actual text read , bolded part was removed in the complaint.

----------

page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)


Full text :


page:6-7 section:10 sub- section:b (i. through v.)


full text:



As a reminder this was approved and submitted by brinton j resto. Yes brinton j resto did indeed submit the complaint that deliberately removed parts of a sentence to change their meaning.
Cops wear bodycams, so unless the cop's camera wasn't recording at the time and Fatso has the conversation on video, it's Fatso's word against the cop's, and Fatso has a well documented history of embellishing and outright lying about practically everything.

Regardless, "we're aware of the situation" is still not a win for grifter Fatso and his grifter wife. The police are required to respond to these calls. Fatso has obviously proven more than once he is completely unhinged, unreasonable, violent, and a heavy drinker. It's entirely possible he could snap and hurt someone, whether it's himself, his wife, or his neighbors. The police cannot be "aware of this situation" and ignore the calls to his address.
 
Top