Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

[Robert's Gift to Patty]

This is interesting.

View attachment 218466

First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.

But more importantly, Patrick says that a bomb threat was called into Miller Park during the Brewer's home opener, and includes the following article as proof:

Replay: Brewers 10, New York Mets 0; it's a blowout in home-opening victory

The Brewers return to American Family Field for their 2023 home opener Monday against the New York Mets. Follow here for game updates.

www.jsonline.com

Only problem... there's zero mention of any bomb threat or any other incident in the article. Nada.

He's literally assuming people won't do the research and just take his word when the article says nothing of the sort. It only talks about how Milwaukee was in high spirits, excited for the home opener and blowout win.

IANAL but you can't do that, right? Lying and putting "this article definitively states there was a bomb threat" when it doesn't?

You are stupid, child. The article is cited as proof that an opening day game occurred on that date, not that a bomb threat (the semi-important part) was made.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

>After the October 1 incident, on October 7, a Milwaukee Police Captain spoke with a reporter who had written about the Robinson-Tomlinson home swattings. (ECF 28-1 at 15–16). The reporter, too, had then received threatening and harassing messages. Id. at 15.

Is he implying cops themselves harrassed this fearless unindentified journalist? Do the Milwaukee taxpayers unwittingly fund Cpt. D. Mullen's sink pension?

I think spaceedge called them out on them not actually doing due diligence on pats accusations and just running a story on Pats bias claims. It was harassment it was calling them out on lazy/bad journalism.

 

[Josef Kuminski]

Also the whole “no need for homework” if he already knew the material doesn’t make sense. If he knew everything then it should have taken a couple minutes to do and he would have been a straight A student (since he aced all the tests) which would have qualified him for scholarships and a chance to go to any college in the country.

My best friend who was one of those types that you didn’t know was actually a straight A student because it was “easy” to him because he was smart so homework took no time to do and tests were all A’s. He of course was accepted to a major university freshman year and was the 2nd highest GPA in his HS graduating class. Pigs story stinks.

“I’m so smart that I do badly on things which I consider beneath me because they’re too easy”

Ironically you’d have to be as stupid as Pat to understand. 1.2 academic GPA logic.

A genius who did no homework and aced every test would have a much higher GPA than Pat did. They would do even better in a college setting.

IIRC didn’t he go to some podunk community tech college and not UW?

All of that is just another one of Pat’s TV/Movie Trope like Real Genius. He thinks he’s Val Kilmer, the slacker genius who if he really wanted to apply himself he’d destroy the rest. People who ace exams don’t take problem solving , they take calculus.

It’s a bullshit lie anyway, @BakersfieldChimp isn’t homework count towards like 20-30% of a grade? The only test scores colleges look at are standardized tests and AP/Clep. The whole point of a GPA is to sum up all the work you did in HS. If everything that Rick said was true (it’s a big fat lie), he would have graduated high school with enough college credits to enter as a Junior only to drop out with a semester to go before obtaining a college degree. This entire scenario is dreamt up by a literal retard, whose fat too.

 

[Total Tranny Death]

I hate them and wish they'd die painlessly and peacefully, surrounded by loved ones as soon as today please.

Same, except I hope that it happens moments after paying back the taxpayer for the tens of thousands of dollars they fleeced. It isn't just the fraudulent PPP "loans", it's also the unreported income from the SFWA lolsuit and whoever paid the judgement

 

[TorquieTwoBeers]

This is interesting.

View attachment 218466

First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.

I'm not sure what he's going for here. First of all, his thought experiment appears to be one sentence long ("If these officers...") because he immediately spins to an unconnected conclusion ("... inferences must be drawn...") in the next sentence. But also, the SWAT-ing calls are emergencies and extremely time-sensitive. Getting a warrant can take weeks/months/years. There is nothing comparable here. Let me re-write this for Pat:

Consider a thought experiment. What if a completely different situation happened instead? Therefore, the Plaintiffs (me, Patrick S. Tomlinson) should win.

Fucking moron.

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

So no official update yet. Thats disappointing.

if they filed it at the end of the business day it won't show up until tomorrow

 

[Total Tranny Death]

Does trashing his phone even help him at all? I'm obviously not a computer science expert, but wouldn't his phone carrier still have the data transmitted from his phone? Even if he hid behind a VPN, he'd still have to send crypto to torswats from his (Nikki's) bank account.

Not at all. If he is behind the swattings, then there will most likely be a clear paper trail leading back to him. I don't know why so many people think trashing his phone was part of the plan. It happened at least a month or several months before he got outed, and he paid for many more swats afterwards. People seem to forget that we are dealing with a legitimate retard

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

This is the first time he's specifically stated which college he allegedly went to. He claims he went to the University of Wisconsin, the best school in the state. His grades were complete fucking shit so there's no way he was there on any type of scholarship. I guess he wants us to believe Tommy sucked off the Dean of admissions and they let Pat right in. But then I wonder why Pat dropped out? Patrick S. Tomlinson the fat college dropout. I guess after he studied every Stanley Kubrick film in that one class he decided he had learned everything there was to know so there was no need to stay in school and earn a degree.

the question is which satellite campus did he go to? they don't have the same admission standards as the main campus.

 

[Blurry Niki Enthusiast]

Yet another L for Rick by proving false information about the Brewers opening. Nice self-imposed ethical conflict, stupid.

When false evidence is offered by the client, however, a conflict may arise between the lawyer's duty to keep the client's revelations confidential and the duty of candor to the court. Upon ascertaining that material evidence is false, the lawyer should seek to persuade the client that the evidence should not be offered or, if it has been offered, that its false character should immediately be disclosed. If the persuasion is ineffective, the lawyer must take reasonable remedial measure

Except in the defense of a criminal accused, the rule generally recognized is that, if necessary to rectify the situation, an advocate must disclose the existence of the client's deception to the court or to the other party. Such a disclosure can result in grave consequences to the client, including not only a sense of betrayal but also loss of the case and perhaps a prosecution for perjury. But the alternative is that the lawyer cooperate in deceiving the court, thereby subverting the truth-finding process which the adversary system is designed to implement. See Rule 1.2(d). Furthermore, unless it is clearly understood that the lawyer will act upon the duty to disclose the existence of false evidence, the client can simply reject the lawyer's advice to reveal the false evidence and insist that the lawyer keep silent. Thus the client could in the effect coerce the lawyer into being a party to fraud on the court.

 

[Rick Roblinson]

the question is which satellite campus did he go to? they don't have the same admission standards as the main campus.

UW-Sheboygan probably

 

[VizioDash]

We've only had to hire a lawyer once for something and they were able to reach a resolution without filing anything, is it normal for lawyers to let you write your own filings? lol. "Hey, I know you went to law school but let me sperg on for 27 paragraphs like this is Twitter."

This was likely just written by a paralegal or lawyer using notes from their meetings with Piggy and Stinky. So their verbiage and idiocy is going to leak in there regardless of the lawyer's ability.

That said, I recently had a legal case myself where the opposing counsel quoted Shakespeare in his memorandum. I have no doubt that any dipshit ambulance chaser that piggy got to take his case would also write this garbage.

 

[CompoundBasement]

We've only had to hire a lawyer once for something and they were able to reach a resolution without filing anything, is it normal for lawyers to let you write your own filings? lol. "Hey, I know you went to law school but let me sperg on for 27 paragraphs like this is Twitter."

Yes, it's common for narcissistic assholes like Fatso to insist on writing all of their own shit for their cases because they consider themselves smarter than the lawyers and hate being told "no, this won't work". You hire an attorney to represent you and the attorney will do what you ask, to a point. For example, the attorney won't file anything which will get himself in hot water with the judge, ruin his own reputation, and especially risk getting himself sanctioned and disbarred.

Often times with people like Fatso, it's just easier to let the asshole client write their own motions, etc. because lawyers hate writing all of it anyway, especially when they don't have an office full of paralegals to do that mundane work for them. The lawyers will look over what the client submits and add and omit things before it's filed, but leave a lot of what the client INSISTS remains. The client simply won't lisTen when they are told what is nonsense, irrelevant, and will annoy the judge, so they do whatever it takes to represent their client to the best of their ability.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

So what are the odds of this sad excuse of a rebuttal moves things forward? Pats ready to pony up another $10k to drag this out. What is the next step if it does? Someone said "discovery". Would going into a discovery phase humiliate pat and expose his lies? I might want to see that movie.

 

[FranksWirecutters]

Yes, it's common for narcissistic assholes like Fatso to insist on writing all of their own shit for their cases because they consider themselves smarter than the lawyers and hate being told "no, this won't work". You hire an attorney to represent you and the attorney will do what you ask, to a point. For example, the attorney won't file anything which will get himself in hot water with the judge, ruin his own reputation, and especially risk getting himself sanctioned and disbarred.

Brinton Resto, comment?

 

[SFWA liaison]

Scheduling reminders:
Defendants may file reply within 2 weeks

also this is on the schedule too for later on, if the judge doesn't dismiss before then

 

[CompoundBasement]

So what are the odds of this sad excuse of a rebuttal moves things forward? Pats ready to pony up another $10k to drag this out. What is the next step if it does? Someone said "discovery". Would going into a discovery phase humiliate pat and expose his lies? I might want to see that movie.

If the judge allows this to proceed to trial, whomever is funding their lawsuit will most likely need to shell out MANY more thousands before it can proceed. It's not like he's some A-list client which will make celebrity lawyers out of their firm. If Fatso's benefactor can't come up with a decent down payment at least, the lawyers can make a motion to withdraw and drop Fatso and the frump wife as clients. It's not guaranteed the judge will grant the withdrawal, but that's usually how it goes.

 

[Steve Ramone]

If the judge allows this to proceed to trial, whomever is funding their lawsuit will most likely need to shell out MANY more thousands before it can proceed. It's not like he's some A-list client which will make celebrity lawyers out of their firm. If Fatso's benefactor can't come up with a decent down payment at least, the lawyers can make a motion to withdraw and drop Fatso and the frump wife as clients. It's not guaranteed the judge will grant the withdrawal, but that's usually how it goes.

Guaranteed if the city doesnt settle he drops the case. I don't know how he gets his lawsuit money but the person cannot have a bottomless bank account

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

Guaranteed if the city doesnt settle he drops the case. I don't know how he gets his lawsuit money but the person cannot have a bottomless bank account

Especially against the bankroll of a fuckin city.

 

[RickReternal]

There’s a slim chance this was taken on contingency, maybe higher than the 33% lawyers usually take of the settlement. I know I will get wedgied for saying this…it’s just crazy to me that Pat would pay out of pocket for such a long shot case (and trust me, I really really do believe he’s stupid). Also whose money? He has nothing of his own. They’re just sucking Lynne dry? No, I think maybe Odell had a lean year and decided this was worth a risk. Crash me.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

There’s a slim chance this was taken on contingency, maybe higher than the 33% lawyers usually take of the settlement. I know I will get wedgied for saying this…it’s just crazy to me that Pat would pay out of pocket for such a long shot case (and trust me, I really really do believe he’s stupid). Also whose money? He has nothing of his own. They’re just sucking Lynne dry? No, I think maybe Odell had a lean year and decided this was worth a risk. Crash me.

The only reason I cant fully say "no" to the Lynne theory is because her daughter is the main person on it.