- Forum Clout
- 50,791
Oh my God, he eclipsed the last one with this 29 page effort. And it completely reads like Pat wrote every single word. No law cited, or case precedent, just NO CHILD, I AM SPECIAL. This is pure hilarity.
-
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
- Thread starter Cumtown Fags
- Start date
- Forum Clout
- 67,519
This is interesting.
First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.
But more importantly, Patrick says that a bomb threat was called into Miller Park during the Brewer's home opener, and includes the following article as proof:
Only problem... there's zero mention of any bomb threat or any other incident in the article. Nada.
He's literally assuming people won't do the research and just take his word when the article says nothing of the sort. It only talks about how Milwaukee was in high spirits, excited for the home opener and blowout win.
IANAL but you can't do that, right? Lying and putting "this article definitively states there was a bomb threat" when it doesn't?
First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.
But more importantly, Patrick says that a bomb threat was called into Miller Park during the Brewer's home opener, and includes the following article as proof:
Replay: Brewers 10, New York Mets 0; it's a blowout in home-opening victory
The Brewers return to American Family Field for their 2023 home opener Monday against the New York Mets. Follow here for game updates.
www.jsonline.com
Only problem... there's zero mention of any bomb threat or any other incident in the article. Nada.
He's literally assuming people won't do the research and just take his word when the article says nothing of the sort. It only talks about how Milwaukee was in high spirits, excited for the home opener and blowout win.
IANAL but you can't do that, right? Lying and putting "this article definitively states there was a bomb threat" when it doesn't?
- Forum Clout
- 40,217
Yeah I was going to say, Rick or Nikki clearly wrote the first two sections at the very least. You can tell no lawyer wrote that.
- Forum Clout
- 677
We've only had to hire a lawyer once for something and they were able to reach a resolution without filing anything, is it normal for lawyers to let you write your own filings? lol. "Hey, I know you went to law school but let me sperg on for 27 paragraphs like this is Twitter."
- Forum Clout
- 2,979
He's fucking insane.This is interesting.
View attachment 218466
First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.
But more importantly, Patrick says that a bomb threat was called into Miller Park during the Brewer's home opener, and includes the following article as proof:
Replay: Brewers 10, New York Mets 0; it's a blowout in home-opening victory
The Brewers return to American Family Field for their 2023 home opener Monday against the New York Mets. Follow here for game updates.www.jsonline.com
Only problem... there's zero mention of any bomb threat or any other incident in the article. Nada.
He's literally assuming people won't do the research and just take his word when the article says nothing of the sort. It only talks about how Milwaukee was in high spirits, excited for the home opener and blowout win.
IANAL but you can't do that, right? Lying and putting "this article definitively states there was a bomb threat" when it doesn't?
- Forum Clout
- 40,217
Wouldn’t there be a police report if that actually happened? Why even mention this at all, it has zero to do with this case? Fucking mongoloids.
- Forum Clout
- 21,330
- Forum Clout
- 24,266
It seems like being a snarky twat in legal documents isn't a good strategy but what the fawk do I know?
- Forum Clout
- 67,519
It's to prove, and I quote the brief, "every officer in Milwaukee was aware of Mr. Tomlinson's issues with his harassers".
He put in a legal document what a special, important, famous boy he is. Every officer knows me, child.
- Forum Clout
- 282,897
This question had been asked a few time. What was the gap in time from when he warned the police he was going to get swatted to when it actually happened.
Thats a new detail
Yet they added like 10 individual officers to the case
You mean when he became hostile at the officers and they had to detain him?
How does he know that this is what the dispatch noted?
This backing up torswats claims on how he had to eventually get a response from them. Does that mean his claims that pat had swatted himself are true too? Speculate.
Im assuming pats lawyers got the dispatch recordings since they keep adding extra notes of being advised pats location was probably not a real call.
Doesnt "seizing" refer to taking property and not people? Wouldnt that just be called detaining?
" Whatever this is" That totally sounds like Pat wrote this or at least not a lawyer.
Had the throw in a brewers reference
Thats a new detail
Yet they added like 10 individual officers to the case
You mean when he became hostile at the officers and they had to detain him?
How does he know that this is what the dispatch noted?
This backing up torswats claims on how he had to eventually get a response from them. Does that mean his claims that pat had swatted himself are true too? Speculate.
Im assuming pats lawyers got the dispatch recordings since they keep adding extra notes of being advised pats location was probably not a real call.
Doesnt "seizing" refer to taking property and not people? Wouldnt that just be called detaining?
" Whatever this is" That totally sounds like Pat wrote this or at least not a lawyer.
Had the throw in a brewers reference
- Forum Clout
- 24,266
- Forum Clout
- 24,266
It's about time for the city and mpd to bring up Pat's arrest history for threatening to kill Jon & Adrienne and the unhinged way he reacts every single time they show up. They have had probable cause to check things out when he's involved because he's proven he's a fat fucking lunatic.
- Forum Clout
- 24,360
Sir, don't do that.
- Forum Clout
- 40,217
lol what? Its reasonable to infer that literally every officer knows the details of something that happened at a baseball game?
- Forum Clout
- 67,519
My conclusion is that Pat/Niki/ChatGPT wrote the brief and handed it to the lawyers. The lawyers then decided this case was pretty dead in the water thanks to qualified immunity and such, but had a paralegal go over it to add case citations, dispatch recordings, and in some cases write entire paragraphs when Pat didn't touch on that issue.
I'm guessing he gave them a big haughty speech about how he lost the lolsuit because his previous lawyers didn't listen to his genius, so take his money and let him present the arguments he wants. They didn't even bother doublechecking the Miller Park thing which instantly takes away all his credibility, he cited a "Brewers fans have a great day as Turang hits a grand slam!" article and lied that it said a bomb threat was called in his name.
- Forum Clout
- 113,346
The "May 2020" claim he has said under oath or penalty of perjury at least a couple of times
- Forum Clout
- 17,934
He also brings up that he was known to MPD for 3-4 years leading up to the first incident he's suing over. I have high hopes that all the emails where he harasses a sergeant to investigate people for such crimes as making fun of his dead lizard on twitter, taking pictures of him at events where he's present in his capacity as a public figure, and god knows what else. "Yeah, we didn't listen to his insistence that terrible things were going to happen because he had shown he was a hysterical and frankly very fat person who wastes people's time with nonsense. Our bad."
- Forum Clout
- 7,922
>After the October 1 incident, on October 7, a Milwaukee Police Captain spoke with a reporter who had written about the Robinson-Tomlinson home swattings. (ECF 28-1 at 15–16). The reporter, too, had then received threatening and harassing messages. Id. at 15.
Is he implying cops themselves harrassed this fearless unindentified journalist? Do the Milwaukee taxpayers unwittingly fund Cpt. D. Mullen's sink pension?
Is he implying cops themselves harrassed this fearless unindentified journalist? Do the Milwaukee taxpayers unwittingly fund Cpt. D. Mullen's sink pension?
- Forum Clout
- 39,068
Good catch, why did they not mention the Patti LaBelle incident as well?This is interesting.
View attachment 218466
First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.
But more importantly, Patrick says that a bomb threat was called into Miller Park during the Brewer's home opener, and includes the following article as proof:
Replay: Brewers 10, New York Mets 0; it's a blowout in home-opening victory
The Brewers return to American Family Field for their 2023 home opener Monday against the New York Mets. Follow here for game updates.www.jsonline.com
Only problem... there's zero mention of any bomb threat or any other incident in the article. Nada.
He's literally assuming people won't do the research and just take his word when the article says nothing of the sort. It only talks about how Milwaukee was in high spirits, excited for the home opener and blowout win.
IANAL but you can't do that, right? Lying and putting "this article definitively states there was a bomb threat" when it doesn't?
- Forum Clout
- 282,897
He always changes his lies to how it can best favor him in a particular situation. I hope one day that they can be used against him in court and it ruins his case