- Forum Clout
- 9,981
Update, but no doc (yet?). https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68293540/robinson-v-city-of-milwaukee/
-
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
- Thread starter Cumtown Fags
- Start date
- Forum Clout
- 113,346
Note how he doesn't correcT not losing his virginity until Ade. Two-women virgin
- Forum Clout
- 9,981
Oh, I see. The others were there not because they were necessarily scraped up from some court website, but were purchased once from PACER. At least that's how the RECAP plugin blurb reads when you click over to PACER.
- Forum Clout
- 24,360
I was digging this shit up at one point and calling clerks/emailing administration offices trying to find out where the fat faggot (its legal pat, cry about it) went and then I went on a mid week bender and forgot everything I'd done and said fuck it.
If he's going to volunteer it though, I wonder how hard getting special boy's transcript would be?
- Forum Clout
- 21,329
Dunno
Dear Sir/Madam,
I, [Your Name], am writing this letter to authorize the release of my transcript of records to [Name of Recipient]. I am currently unable to personally request and pick up the transcript due to [state the reason, e.g. work commitment, health condition, etc.], and therefore, I am entrusting [Name of Recipient] to do it on my behalf.
Enclosed are the necessary documents to prove my identity and authorization, including a copy of my government-issued ID and a signed copy of this letter. [Name of Recipient] will present these documents upon request.
I appreciate your kind assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
This would probably be insanely illegal so this is just a joke.
- Forum Clout
- 282,892
- Forum Clout
- 11,336
Tommy Tomlinson sucked that dean's cock for the love of the game, nothing more.
- Forum Clout
- 35,145
He didn't write it. I skimmed most of it. It's not bad really.
Edit to say it does feel like they're trying to make their whole case in the motion rather than argue what was in the other one.
- Forum Clout
- 80,982
Jesus, 29 pages. I'll let some other brothaman post the highlights.Welp, here is his reply at the bottom of the page! https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68293540/robinson-v-city-of-milwaukee/
- Forum Clout
- 39,068
- Forum Clout
- 24,360
Nice repeating yourself for over a dozen pages, Pat.
Enjoy the dismissal. We. Will.
- Forum Clout
- 67,516
I'm on page 2 and it really seems like he wrote most of it, it's way too dramatic and emotional.
This lawsuit is about officers ignoring the information in front of their noses! Nobody who graduated law school would write that.
- Forum Clout
- 21,329
He wrote a lot of it for sure. Simple grammatical mistakes, italics for emphasis, histrionic rambling and repition. He definitely paid a lawyer to look it over though.
- Forum Clout
- 24,360
A lawyer definitely wrote part of it. Pat doesn't know how to spell curtilage let alone know the definition of it.
- Forum Clout
- 39,068
Is it 52 or 46?
- Forum Clout
- 25,827
I want to sign up for Twitter and constantly accuse Rick of swatting me. I have exactly as much proof of this as he has against us. I hate Twitter too much to follow through with this but god he annoys me.Is it 52 or 46?
- Forum Clout
- 67,516
It's weird but yeah. This was clearly written by a lawyer:
Quoting court cases and using unbiased language.
But then there's this:
Let me tell you EXACTLY what the swatters were thinking. "Without delving into the gritty details".
It really makes the entire brief really confusing, switching from legalese to Patrick's verbose storytelling.
- Forum Clout
- 45,944
lol to whoever the rascal who did this
The incident where the cops handcuffed him and he yelled like a crazy woman is the first swatting he cites as a 4th Amendment violation. Can’t wait for the police footage to be admitted as evidence. That audio from a Facebook neighbor is all we have!
The incident where the cops handcuffed him and he yelled like a crazy woman is the first swatting he cites as a 4th Amendment violation. Can’t wait for the police footage to be admitted as evidence. That audio from a Facebook neighbor is all we have!
- Forum Clout
- 113,346
Nikki is writing these using GPT like she does the blog posts she charges people for (more on that later)
ofc not the "facts" of their particular case but paragraphs that aren't about special boy's special situation test positive for GPT
ofc not the "facts" of their particular case but paragraphs that aren't about special boy's special situation test positive for GPT
Last edited: