• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

Forum Clout
9,982
Guaranteed if the city doesnt settle he drops the case. I don't know how he gets his lawsuit money but the person cannot have a bottomless bank account
I can't imagine going to trial was ever part of Pat's plan, which is why I kinda wanted to see one (and he still loses) vs. an up-front dismissal. He thinks that's he's pulling off some amazing "turn $XX,XXX into $X,XXX,XXX" play. A trial may very well be an unintended consequence. Which would be fucking hilarious.
 

J.B. Mauney

HIT THE LIKES, WE ARE SHADOWBANNED
Forum Clout
34,154
It's weird but yeah. This was clearly written by a lawyer:

View attachment 218459

Quoting court cases and using unbiased language.

But then there's this:

View attachment 218460

Let me tell you EXACTLY what the swatters were thinking. "Without delving into the gritty details".

It really makes the entire brief really confusing, switching from legalese to Patrick's verbose storytelling.


Lol this is like William Faulker's As I Lay Dying


I don't know who's talking or what's going on.
Nice Post-Modern legal motion, stupid.
 

Steve Ramone

Forum Clout
21,330
There’s a slim chance this was taken on contingency, maybe higher than the 33% lawyers usually take of the settlement. I know I will get wedgied for saying this…it’s just crazy to me that Pat would pay out of pocket for such a long shot case (and trust me, I really really do believe he’s stupid). Also whose money? He has nothing of his own. They’re just sucking Lynne dry? No, I think maybe Odell had a lean year and decided this was worth a risk. Crash me.
I got a new theory by applying Tomlinson's law. When presented with 2 options Rick will always pick a 3rd option so stupid you could have never guessed it.

He definitely took a home equity loan against the hovel to pay for this. No more lein after Quasi got paid, and this is a sure thing.
 
Forum Clout
80,988
I got a new theory by applying Tomlinson's law. When presented with 2 options Rick will always pick a 3rd option so stupid you could have never guessed it.

He definitely took a home equity loan against the hovel to pay for this. No more lein after Quasi got paid, and this is a sure thing.
They have no equity, though. Or, very little.
 

SensibleKeks

Forum Clout
21,397
Yet another L for Rick by proving false information about the Brewers opening. Nice self-imposed ethical conflict, stupid.
Wrong as always sweet summer child. As the article clearly states, both Brian Anderson and Brice Turbang each hit a home run during the game. Bomb threats confirmed.

 

HeyItsVos

Forum Clout
16,563
lol to whoever the rascal who did this

View attachment 218461

The incident where the cops handcuffed him and he yelled like a crazy woman is the first swatting he cites as a 4th Amendment violation. Can’t wait for the police footage to be admitted as evidence. That audio from a Facebook neighbor is all we have!
More evidence the SWATter isn’t from here. Any of us would have said Nikki was caught in bed with a woman.
 

DominusOdium

Owner/Operator of Liquor Gallery, Elizabeth NJ
Forum Clout
53,302
I'm on page 2 and it really seems like he wrote most of it, it's way too dramatic and emotional.

View attachment 218446
This lawsuit is about officers ignoring the information in front of their noses! Nobody who graduated law school would write that.
This is Patrick's authorial voice for sure.
 

DominusOdium

Owner/Operator of Liquor Gallery, Elizabeth NJ
Forum Clout
53,302
Is it 52 or 46?

46e777d6a2a4e0c180e05dde58457231.png

9027ee12aa9dcc6a49a1a4194a0a127a.png
Even he isn't stupid enough to puff numbers up in an actual filing
 

DominusOdium

Owner/Operator of Liquor Gallery, Elizabeth NJ
Forum Clout
53,302
It's weird but yeah. This was clearly written by a lawyer:

View attachment 218459

Quoting court cases and using unbiased language.

But then there's this:

View attachment 218460

Let me tell you EXACTLY what the swatters were thinking. "Without delving into the gritty details".

It really makes the entire brief really confusing, switching from legalese to Patrick's verbose storytelling.
He likely insisted on a rewrite and to add his own sections.
 

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
128,892
If the judge doesn't throw it out and somehow it makes it to trial I think the city is going to settle. I doubt that Milwaukee wants it to go on trial.

Insane take, they have the law on their side completely and he’s named multiple officers personally, they are not unanimously agreeing to settle when he’s got zero chance. It’s getting tossed.

Emotional thought experiments vs concise legal rebuttals.
 

General Fatton

Stop. You're wrong. You know nothing
Forum Clout
1,272
I'll come out and say it, I(♥)ANAL, but this seems to be as good as Rick could have replied. Good job by the Strang Bradley guys tardwrangling the pig into submission and avoiding lulzy lines

The beauty of patposting is that it's an infinite-sum game:
- Do the lawsuit get dismissed? LOL
- Do we have a new trial? LMAO
- Does Rick prevail against all odds, and gets some money via settlement/full porcine victory? You just know he will throw all that money back on the roulette table and ask a do over vs Leslie/Quaso/Boomia: Lol, lmao even.
 
Forum Clout
9,982
If the judge doesn't throw it out and somehow it makes it to trial I think the city is going to settle. I doubt that Milwaukee wants it to go on trial.
I figure that both sides want the cheapest, most expedient option - City for a dismissal, and Fatrick for a settlement. I’ve been lucky enough to have this retardation off of my life’s bingo card, but if Milwaukee was going for the most expedient option, wouldn’t they have offered some paltry sum to STFU and go away?
 
Top