I'll just leave this here, then.

[RoxburyRick]

No matter how you slice it, Hildo loves himself a Milwaukee 3

 

[gassers]

Watch out, he’ll call you a “scoundtroll”!

He showed us allright. How will we recover?

 

[RoxburyRick]

Watch out, he’ll call you a “scountroll”!

He's a real Pedophildeman

 

[gassers]

He's a real Pedophildeman

Who do you think is worse? Pedos or Pedo sympathizers?

It's a tough one maaaaan.

 

[Harry Powell]

@NormsGhost

Genuine question, are you not afraid of Boomia?

I consider him a “friend” in as much as that could apply to someone from this board and I wouldn’t antagonize him like that.

I’ve seen a picture of his upper body, he’s like 2x “our” size

Edit: also pls reply to my PM about the phone number. I really do want to call him with hilarious soundboard pranks and stuff, but I won’t be mean, I like him.

 

[Niki]

No matter how you slice it, Hildo loves himself a Milwaukee 3

we saw you from across the bar tyrone please have my wife for the night

 

[RoxburyRick]

Who do you think is worse? Pedos or Pedo sympathizers?

It's a tough one maaaaan.

Chris Hansen should set up a sting operation to catch people who write impolite stuff in online funeral guestbooks.

 

[RoxburyRick]

@NormsGhost nigga ya wife has a worse hairline than you stupid

 

[Steve Ramone]

I don't defend celibate pedophiles. When I say that a celibate pedophile is morally superior to a scountroll who defaces an online memorial, I'm not defending the pedophile. I'm insulting YOU.

Willingness to commit graffiti on a loved one's memorial is not the moral baseline. It's the lowest level you can get.

I can't think of a dumber take. Dude, it's an online Memorial, who fucking cares? Just close your eyes lol.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

I can't think of a dumber take. Dude, it's an online Memorial, who fucking cares? Just close your eyes lol.

It’s because these types take the internet so seriously and believe it’s real life. As someone once said is it tasteless? Yes - But that’s where it ends.

 

[Faggot Boqposter]

There is no such thing as a “non offending pedophile”. The urges from sexual paraphilias are simply too strong to ignore forever.

A man attracted to kids will act on his impulses, even if that doesn’t mean hurting any actual kids or even consuming child porn. Creepy looks at kids playing. Accidentally on purpose walking by various places where kids in vulnerable dress are playing:/competing. Masturbating to admittedly non illegal pictures of kids.

Do ya think a man who jerks off to his neighbors kids playing in the pool is better than a rascal “defacing” an online memorial?

 

[Rabbi Krinsky]

I don't defend celibate pedophiles. When I say that a celibate pedophile is morally superior to a scountroll who defaces an online memorial, I'm not defending the pedophile. I'm insulting YOU.

Willingness to commit graffiti on a loved one's memorial is not the moral baseline. It's the lowest level you can get.

You're right, if writing "Ro Cumia sucks cocks in hell" on a digital obituary (where it can easily be deleted) is the lowest you can get morally, that means that actual child rape is above it. Which means you're defending actual pedophiles.

Did you get that Mensa membership with your fat wife's happy meal, Eric?

 

[Steve Ramone]

It’s because these types take the internet so seriously and believe it’s real life. As someone once said is it tasteless? Yes - But that’s where it ends.

Hello exactly. I see it all the time from the retards in Pat's replys who think replying to his public posts on twitter with all the dumb shit he's said and done is stalking. It's fucking twitter you retards.

 

[FatPatsBaps]

@NormsGhost

Another serious question, and answer this time, Robin.

How much pussy did you get in the Milwaukee karaoke scene? And when I say pussy, I mean over the age of consent. Personally I think you're a liar. There's no chance IN HELL that you're a sex haver.

 

[Leonard Rhomberg]

It’s because these types take the internet so seriously and believe it’s real life. As someone once said is it tasteless? Yes - But that’s where it ends.

The level of commemoration of an online obituary vs a grave site also is completely different. Over time the obituary will be lost on the internet while people will still continue to visit the headstone. The online obit is mostly just there to inform those who may have known them at the time and will eventually be forgotten. Yeah the comments on peoples pages are mean but at the end of the day its bytes on the internet

 

[Bin_The_Blacks]

Of course it can be disputed.

Odd way to put this.

 

[NormsGhost]

You're right, if writing "Ro Cumia sucks cocks in hell" on a digital obituary (where it can easily be deleted) is the lowest you can get morally, that means that actual child rape is above it. Which means you're defending actual pedophiles.

Did you get that Mensa membership with your fat wife's happy meal, Eric?

Where, for fuck's sake, did I ever support "actual child rape?" Where do you get that from? Show me!
This is why I just ignore you idiots most of the time. I say one thing, and you hear something totally different. Why should I bother if I say "A" and you hear and see "B"? Are you all off your meds or something? Are you hearing voices?

 

[Will Tate]

Where, for fuck's sake, did I ever support "actual child rape?" Where do you get that from? Show me!
This is why I just ignore you idiots most of the time. I say one thing, and you hear something totally different. Why should I bother if I say "A" and you hear and see "B"? Are you all off your meds or something? Are you hearing voices?

Look at this faggot! "SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE!!!!" Fuck you, Hildy, you weren't so demanding of evidence when it came to Snackie's faildoxxing so how's about you keep your faggot pedo-apologist mouth shut with your sissy little demands. We're gonna keep calling you a degenerate child-raping pedophile and there's fuck all you can do about it.
Faggot pedophile.

 

[NormsGhost]

There is no such thing as a “non offending pedophile”. The urges from sexual paraphilias are simply too strong to ignore forever.

A man attracted to kids will act on his impulses, even if that doesn’t mean hurting any actual kids or even consuming child porn. Creepy looks at kids playing. Accidentally on purpose walking by various places where kids in vulnerable dress are playing:/competing. Masturbating to admittedly non illegal pictures of kids.

Do ya think a man who jerks off to his neighbors kids playing in the pool is better than a rascal “defacing” an online memorial?

Of course not! It's always and only been your hyperactive imagination that automatically jumps to the "masturbating next to kids" thing. Because that's how your minds "work." If anything, that proves the pedos are you lot.

So you're saying it's impossible? That some teenager wouldn't catch his temptations, and I dunno, run into the priesthood or become a Buddhist monk and live out his days as an elderly incel? Absolutely impossible?

The question is moot, anyway. It's a hypothetical. And still one that shows how immoral you idiots are.

 

[Will Tate]

Of course not! It's always and only been your hyperactive imagination that automatically jumps to the "masturbating next to kids" thing. Because that's how your minds "work." If anything, that proves the pedos are you lot.

So you're saying it's impossible? That some teenager wouldn't catch his temptations, and I dunno, run into the priesthood or become a Buddhist monk and live out his days as an elderly incel? Absolutely impossible?

The question is moot, anyway. It's a hypothetical. And still one that shows how immoral you idiots are.

Kid-toucher.