• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

I wanna see the debtor's movie!

Petworth dude

An honourable sperg.
Forum Clout
7,702
There is no debt, stlaker
IMG_0083.jpeg
 
G

guest

Guest
It’s not fucking SFWA. They don’t have the money to just be paying off shit like that and no way that many timid nerds are putting their necks on the line to protect the last group of leaders who would have started all this shit. It’s totally different people in charge now.
I still think it could be former leadership who don't want Pat's finances looked into.
 

Brooke Shields

Patrick Tomlinson hates me because I am a woman
Forum Clout
71,035
G

guest

Guest
So Cat Rambo sat around and waited for the debt to double and then stroked a personal check for over 30 G’s?

Seems far fetched.
You're assuming Pat would tell her about that, or that she wouldn't believe his nonsense about wriggling out of it. She was stupid enough to dump 100K on this nonsense to begin with. Also she can't have been the only one at SFWA who greenlighted it - everyone involved has skin in the game.
 

WifeStoreWill

The WifeStore called, they’re running out of gooks
Forum Clout
33,743
You're assuming Pat would tell her about that, or that she wouldn't believe his nonsense about wriggling out of it. She was stupid enough to dump 100K on this nonsense to begin with. Also she can't have been the only one at SFWA who greenlighted it - everyone involved has skin in the game.
She and the others spent SFWA money on it but they aren’t in charge of that money anymore. None of the odd bums can afford to find that now with their personal money. It’s way more likely, if they did something illegal, that one of them would have rolled on the others for immunity by now.
 
G

guest

Guest
She and the others spent SFWA money on it but they aren’t in charge of that money anymore.
So they're not culpable for financial crime if they're not holding the bag any more?
None of the odd bums can afford to find that now with their personal money.
You sound pretty certain of that but I don't see any proof.

It’s way more likely, if they did something illegal, that one of them would have rolled on the others for immunity by now.
This is just a naive way of viewing human behavior.
 

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
246,175
You're assuming Pat would tell her about that, or that she wouldn't believe his nonsense about wriggling out of it. She was stupid enough to dump 100K on this nonsense to begin with. Also she can't have been the only one at SFWA who greenlighted it - everyone involved has skin in the game.
Also note she cancelled her appearance at the last con Pat was a guest for. She doesn’t want to deal with him at all.
 

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
246,175
She and the others spent SFWA money on it but they aren’t in charge of that money anymore. None of the odd bums can afford to find that now with their personal money. It’s way more likely, if they did something illegal, that one of them would have rolled on the others for immunity by now.
If I remember there was some concern that this kind of thing if it got out could screw with their charity tax status
 

WifeStoreWill

The WifeStore called, they’re running out of gooks
Forum Clout
33,743
So they're not culpable for financial crime if they're not holding the bag any more?

You sound pretty certain of that but I don't see any proof.


This is just a naive way of viewing human behavior.
I never said they’re not culpable, I said they aren’t in charge any more so they can’t agree to paying off the debt. And we have plenty of proof that they’re all a bunch of broke losers. I think Scalzi might be the only SFWA or adjacent person we’ve seen who didn’t live in some poverty shithole.
 

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
246,175
So they're not culpable for financial crime if they're not holding the bag any more?

You sound pretty certain of that but I don't see any proof.


This is just a naive way of viewing human behavior.
I’m guessing some NDA’s were involved - remember Pat bragged about signing one around the time of the suit? He’s been very careful to tip toe around the vague “group” funding his suit - even to Joshua moon who if I remember right was told by Pat that kind of stuff was off the record
 
G

Guest

Guest
we don't know every aspect of his life. there are lots of people we don't know about who could've given him the money.

fatrick isn't literally a tv show where there was a character introduced earlier that foreshadowed who paid off the debt.

retards.
We know every single aspect of his life. He posts it. If it’s not on his Twitter it doesn’t exist.
 

SFWA liaison

Heidi Hildeman customer
Forum Clout
99,638
we don't know every aspect of his life. there are lots of people we don't know about who could've given him the money.

fatrick isn't literally a tv show where there was a character introduced earlier that foreshadowed who paid off the debt.

retards.
how many people in your own life do you know that will gift you tens of thousands of dollars? while you remain willingly unemployed and after going on multiple vacations recently?

it can only be SFWA because they spend other people's money. Or nobody and he just amde up the fake benefactor.
 
Top