- Forum Clout
- 19,657
Theyre too lazy. They dont even have a note under his address to not visit him when he swats himselfThey would if they fucking hate him. Which they do
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Theyre too lazy. They dont even have a note under his address to not visit him when he swats himselfThey would if they fucking hate him. Which they do
For someone to run a swat for hire, they have to have some criminal business savvy. You don't just dox a customer, that would kill your reputation. And if you had to do it in a situation like getting ripped off, it would be someone who's identity you 100% were confident in. Otherwise he makes himself out to be a complete fool and again ruins his reputationThis also makes no sense to me. The torswats guy says he knew that Pat was supposedly doing this so he could get hurt and sue the MPD. So if he stopped paying him, why would he continue to aid his effort for free after already getting stiffed? I believe the claim that he got stiffed, but I still don't 100% believe that it was really Patrick.
He's still indicated on his Facebook that he is in the process of putting together legal action. Pat is retarded enough to file a lawsuit against mpd. What happens then?Theyre too lazy. They dont even have a note under his address to not visit him when he swats himself
This is a huge point too. Nobody would be able to guess that unless they were intimately familiar with fatso's M.O. The question is is he familiar because he interacted with him or is he just a fan of pats stupidity2. Torswats knowing that Pat responds to text messages within 30 seconds regardless of the time of day. That either means he definitely has contacted Pat or just coincidentally he goes deep with the Patposting.
Torswats has absolutely fucked Patrick, and I'm not sure Pat realizes by how much yet.This also makes no sense to me. The torswats guy says he knew that Pat was supposedly doing this so he could get hurt and sue the MPD. So if he stopped paying him, why would he continue to aid his effort for free after already getting stiffed? I believe the claim that he got stiffed, but I still don't 100% believe that it was really Patrick.
The Torswats guy could himself be a kiwi that is fucking with Rick. That’s just as likely as anything else.This is a huge point too. Nobody would be able to guess that unless they were intimately familiar with fatso's M.O. The question is is he familiar because he interacted with him or is he just a fan of pats stupidity
I think the biggest argument against is the idea that while Pat is legendarily stupid, allegedly hiring someone to swat a sitting member of congress and then stiffing him on the payment is just a level of stupidity that science previously thought impossible.
All of this is speculation of course except the demonstrably proven fact that the suspect is indeed fat.
He's a lying pig who doesn't have the moneyHe's still indicated on his Facebook that he is in the process of putting together legal action. Pat is retarded enough to file a lawsuit against mpd. What happens then?
The Torswats guy could himself be a kiwi that is fucking with Rick. That’s just as likely as anything else.
that would be Patrick (Dan this is a reference to Patrick being fat. )biggest SWATTer in US history
Wait, Rick paid this guy to swat MTG?I think the biggest argument against is the idea that while Pat is legendarily stupid, allegedly hiring someone to swat a sitting member of congress and then stiffing him on the payment is just a level of stupidity that science previously thought impossible.
Very good point. This is a guy who emails and @mentions Amazon and Goodreads to try and pressure them to change their guidelines because someone posted a book review saying he's fat, but now there's a possibly legitimate case of identity fraud and he isn't squealing his head off at Gemini? Kinda suspicious.The fact that he isn't pissing his pants and loudly proclaiming that an imposter registered and verified an account on a crypto exchange, then used it to commit serious felonies in order to frame him, and you have immediately retained legal counsel and will be getting to the bottom of what happened, and suing the fuck out of Gemini and Coinbase, is quite telling.
Wait, Rick paid this guy to swat MTG?
I voted No for similar reasons. While he is very dumb (and very fat), I feel like he would use a more disguising username than patt1980 or whatever it was. Remember when he joined here it was squirtingcarol and he's used Padawan2.0 and whatever he used on that car forum (it was something that started with K like Krampus but not that).
Also, while he does seem to be hated by many, I feel like he would have someone that would sign up for the service instead of him. One of those SFWA people maybe, or someone he knows from the cons.
Then again, I can't rule out that he's very dumb and did this. It's a tough one.
I think the biggest argument against is the idea that while Pat is legendarily stupid, allegedly hiring someone to swat a sitting member of congress and then stiffing him on the payment is just a level of stupidity that science previously thought impossible.
Yesterday in Coonskin's thread he posted a link to a couple of audio files which were apparently (I ain't clicking on that shit, fed) audio recordings of MTG and Steve Bannon being swatted by voice to speech, and torswats in his conversation with coonskin said that Patrick ordered them.Wait, Rick paid this guy to swat MTG?
I voted No for similar reasons. While he is very dumb (and very fat), I feel like he would use a more disguising username than patt1980 or whatever it was. Remember when he joined here it was squirtingcarol and he's used Padawan2.0 and whatever he used on that car forum (it was something that started with K like Krampus but not that).
Also, while he does seem to be hated by many, I feel like he would have someone that would sign up for the service instead of him. One of those SFWA people maybe, or someone he knows from the cons.
Then again, I can't rule out that he's very dumb and did this. It's a tough one.
I voted no for similar reasons. There's tons of circumstantial evidence and it really looks like he did it himself but it has to be proved.I think he probably did it but I voted no. We may be experiencing some large scale confirmation bias similar to how Space Edge fooled Seth Simons into writing that article by telling him exactly what he wanted to hear.
What if this is a reverse Apostlegate where someone who wants to take down the PFG forums fooled a vice journalist into writing a fake article and we are the Patricks in this situation who are believing all the fake info given to them by an anonymous mole?
Reminder: to sign up for a Gemini account you need:Very good point. This is a guy who emails and @mentions Amazon and Goodreads to try and pressure them to change their guidelines because someone posted a book review saying he's fat, but now there's a possibly legitimate case of identity fraud and he isn't squealing his head off at Gemini? Kinda suspicious.
If he actually bricked his phone on purpose, the communications that he made with that phone won't disappear into the ether. The answer(s) are in his text and email conversations (possibly on his shitty laptop)- if he buys a new laptop within the next week, it would make it pretty obvious that it's him and I think he will eventually crack or completely fuck up this charade.I dont think we'll ever have enough evidence to prove it.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/