• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

WhY DoEsN'T qUaSi pOsT NoW tHaT ThE QuAsH Is fInIsHeD

TorqueWheeler

TorqueWheeler

An enormous amount of muscle.
‎
Forum Clout
76,402
IGotATreeOnMyHouse85 said:
I can’t remember the exact quote but I know the CA judge said something along the lines of “I don’t like bad reviews but it’s not against the law to do it” which shows you how stupid the SFWA is. They spent 100 grand for a judge to say that, that was the whole point of the lawsuit, Pat cried to SFWA about people leaving bad reviews of his book and Mary 3 names felt his lawsuit would benefit their members so she approved the funding. No surprise she had to “step down” once the suit fell apart. She really approved spending 100k of other peoples money trying to fight the first amendment.
Click to expand...
It’s because these lunatics spend their entire lives in the safety of their twitter echo chambers and now actually believe they’re entitled to never have to feel upset or offended.
 
G

guest

Guest
NoBaconEggCheese said:
The disgusting freaks that run SFWA are totally incompetent. It’s insane they get to fund a charity with ~2 million in assets.

These idiots couldn’t predict what’s going to happen to their bread when they put it in a toaster, let alone a complex lawsuit against 60 anonymous forum users. Why the fuck did they squander all that money for? It’s not tax exempt to gift money to a fat man for his personal vendettas.
Click to expand...
Felony fat accusations, child. Now raise my daughter for me.
 
FurBurger

FurBurger

What would you do for a Klondike bar?
‎
Forum Clout
22,495
FurBurger

FurBurger

What would you do for a Klondike bar?
‎
Forum Clout
22,495
notalawyer said:
The court granted Yolanda's permission to ask questions of KGCRE concerning: "(i) the ultimate disposition of assets transferred by KGCRE to Joseph Goveia and Bruce Kahl; (ii) the interrelationship between KGCRE and other judgment debtors and related parties for purposes of establishing possible alter ego liability;
Click to expand...

Can you tell me a little more about this "alter ego liability"? Because that sounds like there's potential for the SFWA to be on the hook for some of Pat's debt to Quasi, and that's putting a smile on my dial.
 
G

guest

Guest
PlayfulScamp said:
Pat truly has a sociopathic lack of empathy given the amount of damage he has done to those around him without a hint of self-awareness or care.
Click to expand...
This is why it was so enraging when Josiah asked him "what would you do differently" and he said "Not a single thing". Like nigga really? You'd drag all your family and friends and professional organizations through this in exactly the same manner all over again? Cunt.
 
Slackjawed Cow

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
‎
‎
Forum Clout
268,818
Timber said:
His family and friends getting hurt - that doesn't come with Battlestar Galactica SFX. The special boy "hears drums" and intuits imminent victory over his abusers. It's all worth it.
Click to expand...
I bet het keeps telling them that he will avenge them and have these culprits behind bars but all they want is him to just change his phone number and stop responding.
 
G

guest

Guest
FurBurger said:
Can you tell me a little more about this "alter ego liability"? Because that sounds like there's potential for the SFWA to be on the hook for some of Pat's debt to Quasi, and that's putting a smile on my dial.
Click to expand...

Not a lawyer, and not a corporate lawyer, but if you've heard the term "piercing the corporate veil" , it refers to liability for the persons of a corporation and not the business itself. I believe the alter ego term is some old common law doctrine or some shit. This get's extremely complicated, there's differences when shareholders are involved, an llc, a corp, a 501(c)(3) etc. No idea what would apply here. The docterine just means that if a corporation were acting in the interests of an individual or individuals , then they can be liable. It happens very rarely though, especially in the United States, where the free market has a lot of protections. The founders didn't want individuals to be scared to start businesses.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/personal-liability-piercing-corporate-veil-33006.html[/URL]
 
G

guest

Guest
Proud Boy 1 said:
This is why it was so enraging when Josiah asked him "what would you do differently" and he said "Not a single thing". Like nigga really? You'd drag all your family and friends and professional organizations through this in exactly the same manner all over again? Cunt.
Click to expand...
He has some capeshit fantasy in his head like this is some gauntlet he's going through and he's going to come out victorious on the other side. So of course, he wouldn't change a single thing because in his fantasy these are all hardships he has to overcome. In reality, it's a problem of his own making because he's just adamant on responding to anything and everything.
 
G

guest

Guest
guest said:
Ok so assuming each side bears their own legal expenses in this action, can Quasi tack his part onto the collection expenses and hit Rick with it?
Click to expand...
I think the debtor has to be shown to be delinquent before you can charge them for collection efforts. Considering the fact that Tubby fatly declared that he would not pay Quasi a penny "even if the judge ordered me to pay him", that might not be too difficult to show
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top