WhY DoEsN'T qUaSi pOsT NoW tHaT ThE QuAsH Is fInIsHeD

[guest]

Ooof.... In there, Caverlock's pointed to a [URL='https://archive.ph/Neixi']tweet of Pat's saying he's rejoined the SFWA now that his friends are in power:[/URL]
View attachment 36458

I guess shortly after his friends took over, they realised they could "loan" Pat a shit-ton of other people's money to sue people for calling him fat on the internet, but only if he rejoined and was a member for a while.

That looks fucking terrible from a charity point of view; I bet they're hoping none of that shows up in court records....

I love how this fat idiot helps with discovery.

 

[handsomeblue]

MichaelRichardsBot was reached for comment on the whole situation:

 

[guest]

So does this mean it would be in Patrick's best interest to rat out the SFWA for providing him the funds? That seems to be the only way of taking some of the financial burden off of himself.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

So does this mean it would be in Patrick's best interest to rat out the SFWA for providing him the funds? That seems to be the only way of taking some of the financial burden off of himself.

I think it means the truth of the matter will come out one way or the other.

 

[Caverlock]

I bet they thought they'd all be getting interviewed by Oprah by now.

 

[Nick Gerlips]

Ooof.... In there, Caverlock's pointed to a tweet of Pat's saying he's rejoined the SFWA now that his friends are in power:
View attachment 36458

I guess shortly after his friends took over, they realised they could "loan" Pat a shit-ton of other people's money to sue people for calling him fat on the internet, but only if he rejoined and was a member for a while.

That looks fucking terrible from a charity point of view; I bet they're hoping none of that shows up in court records....

Patched in SWFA member, child. Just like brother Joe and his motorcycle gang.

 

[Will Tate]

Fat Bitchins

Christopher Sixchins.

 

[guest]

That would be incredible, Pat pisses off the only people that would have him. Everything he touches turns to shit

He's got the Wideass Touch

 

[Ramooooonnnneeeeee]

Assuming the allegations are true and SFWA dues paying members get (rightfully) upset with this gross mismanagement of funds....... Is there any type of legal or other recourse they could take against the people responsible for this possibly including Patrick?

 

[guest]

I posted a long-ass timeline of Patrick and the SFWA working together over on KF.

I'm too lazy to repost it here, and might hit upload limits anyway.

It's more for newcomers, but there are probably a few things that would be new to everyone.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://kiwifarms.net/threads/patrick-sean-tomlinson-stealthygeek.65412/post-11697827[/URL]

It's meant to show how stupid it is to say that Quasi's lawyers should not have access to all correspondence within the pertinent time frame between Patrick, Mary Robinette Kowal, Cat Rambo, and Jason Sanford, at the very least.

@admin

Caverlock showed us that you don’t have to be a gigantic faggot to be a KF poster but it certainly doesn’t hurt.

 

[guest]

He's got the Wideass Touch

You’re silly.

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

Ooof.... In there, Caverlock's pointed to a tweet of Pat's saying he's rejoined the SFWA now that his friends are in power:
View attachment 36458

I guess shortly after his friends took over, they realised they could "loan" Pat a shit-ton of other people's money to sue people for calling him fat on the internet, but only if he rejoined and was a member for a while.

That looks fucking terrible from a charity point of view; I bet they're hoping none of that shows up in court records....

What tough patch is he talking about? Looks like cat Rambo was prez before the wicked witch of western society

 

[Mike Glyer]

What tough patch is he talking about? Looks like cat Rambo was prez before the wicked witch of western society

There was a brief period where they did not passively or actively support pedophiles in the early 2000's. I shudder to think about those dark times.

 

[Dani's Thick Legsters]

looks like we got a new judge

Judge Richard B. Ulmer, Jr. - Comprehensive Profile: Analytics, Rulings & Recent Cases | Trellis.Law

What insights can be gained from Richard B. Ulmer, Jr.'s analytics, notable rulings, and recent cases? Delve into their legal expertise and decision-making trends on Trellis.Law.

trellis.law

looool Republican and enjoys marathons...

also loooooooool

Complains of corruption against San Francisco Judge Ethan Schulman and Judge Richard Ulmer in MedWhat Stanford University fraud case

MedWhat's CEO Arturo Devesa responds to Interrogatories in Stanford-MedWhat lawsuit Discovery phase and in turn Devesa as an individual is sanctioned by Judge E

www.analyticsinsight.net

Based Schulman making it rain left and right

 

[AntSucks]

Assuming the allegations are true and SFWA dues paying members get (rightfully) upset with this gross mismanagement of funds....... Is there any type of legal or other recourse they could take against the people responsible for this possibly including Patrick?

Well you can sue anybody for anything. But for a 501(c) donors can specify if their money is restricted or unrestricted to particular activities. They have to state what your donation is going towards, and if they spend it on something else you have recourse. The members might have agreed to costs to get goodreads to ban trolls, but they are unlikely to have agreed to funding a big private lawsuit that was an "uphill battle" from the beginning.

Good explanation here.

Are You Misappropriating Your Nonprofit's Funds? A Look At Restricted Donations

How to properly deal with restricted and unrestricted funds, and solicited and unsolicited designated donations in your 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

www.501c3.org

 

[Cuphead]

Well you can sue anybody for anything. But for a 501(c) donors can specify if their money is restricted or unrestricted to particular activities. They have to state what your donation is going towards, and if they spend it on something else you have recourse. The members might have agreed to costs to get goodreads to ban trolls, but they are unlikely to have agreed to funding a big private lawsuit that was an "uphill battle" from the beginning.

Good explanation here.

Are You Misappropriating Your Nonprofit's Funds? A Look At Restricted Donations

How to properly deal with restricted and unrestricted funds, and solicited and unsolicited designated donations in your 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

www.501c3.org

Who specifically in the SFWA would be charged if they are found to have misused legal fees?

 

[Dani's Thick Legsters]

Who specifically in the SFWA would be charged if they are found to have misused legal fees?

Even better option is if they had an agreement with Pat but he acted in bad faith, so they sue him for the $100K back. In that case it's probably in their best interest to settle Quasi's smaller debt and take Patrick's house.

 

[Cuphead]

Even better option is if they had an agreement with Pat but he acted in bad faith, so they sue him for the $100K back. In that case it's probably in their best interest to settle Quasi's smaller debt and take Patrick's house.

Fawk I'm getting hard just thinking about all the ways this could play out. All I know is now things get worse for Pat

 

[guest]

Even better option is if they had an agreement with Pat but he acted in bad faith, so they sue him for the $100K back. In that case it's probably in their best interest to settle Quasi's smaller debt and take Patrick's house.

SFWA suing Patrick for some sort of breach of contract could be a very real possibility. They definitely had him sign at least an NDA if not other documents. Unless they're idiots and just write $100k checks to people.

 

[HotDogJoe]

Fawk I'm getting hard just thinking about all the ways this could play out. All I know is now things get worse for Pat

I'm going to enjoy what happens to him neckssssssss-tuh.