G
guest
Guest
I believe this is real just because Sue Lightning thinks it isnt, and hes always wrong.
But even then whats stopping a funster from submitting this to the chat bot not realizing it would be published? Again the point, or “bit”, would be to get advice so he can post on here or KF going “Yeah i consulted a lawyer and they said Pat has no recourse!” or, based on the non answers given by the shitty chatbot, just said “Ah fuck this” and never posted it.The only i think this could be real, is it looks like this dumb website actually publicizes the responses you give to that chat bot. I'd need to test it more to see (but i probably won't).
if that's the case...jeeeesusss christ
But what brotherman would do this and have the impulse control to wait this long to reveal it?But even then whats stopping a funster from submitting this to the chat bot not realizing it would be published? Again the point, or “bit”, would be to get advice so he can post on here or KF going “Yeah i consulted a lawyer and they said Pat has no recourse!” or, based on the non answers given by the shitty chatbot, just said “Ah fuck this” and never posted it.
Presumably the bit didn’t pay off in whatever way they wanted but its again speculatingBut what brotherman would do this and have the impulse control to wait this long to reveal it?
A hallmark of a brotherman is poor executive function.
Quaso knows exactly who paid him and has shared this information with his friend, Admin.The only i think this could be real, is it looks like this dumb website actually publicizes the responses you give to that chat bot. I'd need to test it more to see (but i probably won't).
if that's the case...jeeeesusss christ
i'm saying that makes it better evidence. You have two competing undetermined hypotheses. Funster or not funster. Evidence here is being used as anything that increases the likelihood of one over the other. The fact that it is not as obvious about being public increases the probability of non funster. It does nothing to the probability of funster.But even then whats stopping a funster from submitting this to the chat bot not realizing it would be published? Again the point, or “bit”, would be to get advice so he can post on here or KF going “Yeah i consulted a lawyer and they said Pat has no recourse!” or, based on the non answers given by the shitty chatbot, just said “Ah fuck this” and never posted it.
If there’s a call to the police or Nikki has a black eye in the next week, we will know it was real and she did it without Rick’s permissionOne little thing i think that could make this real is the perspective. If it were just Patrick it would be immediately fishy. If it were just Nikki it would be weird because we see her have 0 autonomy. The fact that it’s Nikki speaking for Patrick…yeah that falls in line with their marriage
Exactly. Like just as a random example, when dan mullen spoiled apostlegate and told the cumtown forums they were pranking pat as the huffington post.But what brotherman would do this and have the impulse control to wait this long to reveal it?
A hallmark of a brotherman is poor executive function.
If the SFWA agreed to pay for the settlement, then you'd think Pat would have an excellent case to sue them for breach of contract. If Nikki wrote this, then I think Pat lied to her on the NDA details.The professional organization funding the lawsuit agreed to pay the settlement and an NDA agreement was signed, but later ghosted us entirely and we have not heard from them or their counsel in over a year.
Son of a BITCH.The only i think this could be real, is it looks like this dumb website actually publicizes the responses you give to that chat bot. I'd need to test it more to see (but i probably won't).
if that's the case...jeeeesusss christ
That's what made me suspicious, it's full of all his greatest lines."Actively harmful" is a common Pat phrase that jumped out to me.
Others:
"all-consuming obsession", always hyphenated
Publicly stated goal
"massive fake review bombing", a phrase he used verbatim here but only once: https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/1536850702676418560
"half a dozen bomb threats" "made in our names" (Notably not six or 6 or "That they blamed us for)
"more important than" "our physical safety"x.com
x.com
x.com
twitter.com
If it's a fake, it's an excellent fake as it uses very specific language and grammar that he uses. There's subtle variations on common phrasing and tropes he uses. You'd need to have an encyclopedia of Patrick language and nuance. I could do a longer version when I have some time, but I'm calling it real.