stlakers are trying to take our fire pit

[Blurry Niki Enthusiast]

Can one of the kiwifarmers post a pic of this or his toilet and ask people to just walk in the house and take it

View attachment 200753

just to see Patrick take it seriously like a retard "THEY'RE TRYING TO MAKE PEOPLE TRESPASS!"
All so people realize, like yeah Pat and steal your toilet?

 

[RoTheHo69]

On a scale of C-SPAN to cartel videos I guess not really that psychotic. I don't understand where he's going with that statement in all honesty.

 

[Brooke Shields]

How psychotic do you have to be to tell a stranger with your toilet as an avatar pic that they are not in fact your toilet...

 

[Blurry Niki Enthusiast]

On a scale of C-SPAN to cartel videos I guess not really that psychotic. I don't understand where he's going with that statement in all honesty.

I don't appreciate his self-diagnosis of me being psychotic, it really hurt my feelings.

 

[RoTheHo69]

I don't appreciate his self-diagnosis of me being psychotic, it really hurt my feelings.

He's diagnosed me and my pal with retardation when he called me one time.

 

[Single Action Army]

idc what any of the fags here or KF say. Pat's trolls are funny as fuck

 

[CompoundBasement]

How fucking psychotic do you have to be to claim a "cult of cyber stlakers are trying to murder you", yet you still constantly dox yourself, your address, your license plates, where you are at varying times of day, your belongings, and the shithole you live in on social media?

 

[RoTheHo69]

I'd say you'd have to be more psychotic to pick up a complete stranger's tagine and use it. And even then not very psychotic really. Nothing anybody does with a tagine is psychotic unless it's used for explicitly psychotic purposes. There is no implied psychosis involving nothing more than a tagine ever. E.G Somebody's severed ear in a tagine? That's pretty fuckin' psychotic. A menacing tagine photograph? You can't make it menacing enough to be psychotic if there's nothing else involved.

Maybe a better way to put this is a tagine in and of itself, devoid of further context, is categorically unpsychotic.

 

[The NaTurryl Man]

The most psychotic guy we've had through here lately raped Leslie. @Hovelofdoom comment?

 

[Rick Roblinson]

Can one of the kiwifarmers post a pic of this or his toilet and ask people to just walk in the house and take it

View attachment 200753

You're the tagine I needed in junior high

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

 

[RoTheHo69]

You're the tagine I needed in junior high

Tangenially

 

[Torque’sHeadBump]

He's diagnosed me and my pal with retardation when he called me one time.

I diagnose him as:

FAT

GAY/FAGGOT

BUSTY/BITCH TITS

 

[firstimelongtime]

pity party on bluesky too
View attachment 200755

"Welp time to open four different apps to have a victimhood tantrum"

He can't really think this - he just has to put this out there. He can't really believe that no one has anything better to do. Unless he truly cannot see past his own flaws and failures. Since he has nothing but spending all of his days online, correcting the record, that it doesn't cannot occur to him that people can lead productive lives while... taking a few seconds away from real life to snicker at him, and then go back to whatever it was they were doing?

Pat - this is all you have. Take away the truly unwarranted, gone-too-far shit (someone tap the sign)... this is still all you have.

(Additionally, either no one close to you has earnestly told you to fucking chill... or you are that much of a cunt that this extends into real life and you are beyond hope.)

Projection Pat is actually kinda pathetic.

 

[firstimelongtime]

I diagnose him as:

FAT

GAY/FAGGOT

BUSTY/BITCH TITS

NO/CHILD
SHORT/83k
OOPSIES/FOREVER DOODLED

 

[firstimelongtime]

Pat and Nana are really the same white trash they both shit on and think they are better than.

At least Nana had a career to tank.

 

[quasi101]

Yes to "gather evidence". He doesn't get how things work. He thinks if he convinces the police the chairs were stolen and a funster pretends to be the thief they've committed a crime. He isn't very bright. One truism we have is, when giving a choice, Pat will always make the wrong one.

its really not that fucking hard i figured it out in the 5 days cloud(faggot)flare gave me to find a lawyer. Determine what the potential torts or crimes associated with whatever thing you want to sure for. Then just google that + "jury instructions" for the venue the court would be in. Obviously there's a lot more to it than that , but as a start you can see if there is anything even close to a cause of action.

Lets see , trespassing... hmm....

https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/files/criminal/1437.pdf

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements
were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant intentionally (entered) (remained in) the dwelling of another.

"Dwelling" means a structure that is used or intended to be used as a home or
residence by one or more persons to the exclusion of all others [whether or not
currently occupied by a resident].3

2. The defendant (entered) (remained in) the dwelling without the consent4 of

someone lawfully upon the premises.

3. The defendant (entered) (remained in) the dwelling under circumstances tending

to create or provoke a breach of the peace.
It is not necessary that an actual breach of the peace occurred as a result of
defendant's conduct.


The term "breach of the peace" includes all violations of peace and order.5
[It may consist of an act of violence or an act likely to produce violence. It
may consist of profane and abusive language by one toward another.]
[It may consist of acts that put (name of victim) in fear of bodily harm or
otherwise disturb or disrupt the peace and sanctity of the home.]6

4. The defendant knew that (the entry into) (remaining in) the dwelling was without

consent and under circumstances tending to create or provoke a breach of the
peace and knew that it was the dwelling of another.7

So it doesn't come close to that. What about theft?

https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/files/criminal/1441.pdf

Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following four elements were present.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove

1. The defendant intentionally took and carried away movable property of another. The term “intentionally” means that the defendant must have had the mental
purpose to take and carry away property “Movable property” means property whose physical location can be changed.

2. The owner of the property did not consent to taking and carrying away the property.

3. The defendant knew that the owner did not consent.

4. The defendant intended to deprive the owner permanently of the possession of the
property.

So even if they knew it was a fake craiglist ad, if they were going to return it as a "just a kiwifarms prank bro" it wouldn't even count as theft due to the 4th requirement.


none of this is a surprise after 5 year, but he takes some capeshit folk notion of something and thinks it applies in real life. Usually if there's 3 or 4 things that must all be satisfied he thinks just one is enough. Fatso flunked out of logic 101 in wisconsin remedial college so of course he can't understand baby's first boolean operators.

 

[CompoundBasement]

its really not that fucking hard i figured it out in the 5 days cloud(faggot)flare gave me to find a lawyer. Determine what the potential torts or crimes associated with whatever thing you want to sure for. Then just google that + "jury instructions" for the venue the court would be in. Obviously there's a lot more to it than that , but as a start you can see if there is anything even close to a cause of action.

Lets see , trespassing... hmm....

https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/files/criminal/1437.pdf











So it doesn't come close to that. What about theft?

https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/files/criminal/1441.pdf

So even if they knew it was a fake craiglist ad, if they were going to return it as a "just a kiwifarms prank bro" it wouldn't even count as theft due to the 4th requirement.


none of this is a surprise after 5 year, but he takes some capeshit folk notion of something and thinks it applies in real life. Usually if there's 3 or 4 things that must all be satisfied he thinks just one is enough. Fatso flunked out of logic 101 in wisconsin remedial college so of course he can't understand baby's first boolean operators.

Not to mention his chairs are fucking worthless so law enforcement wouldn't waste their/taxpayer time investigating this stupid, drunk frat boy prank bullshit.

If he stopped posting all of his life online no one would have anything to fuck with online, or in person. Stop replying, stop engaging, stop feeding the trolls, and lock down your social media. He has never once tried this, so he obviously enjoys the attention.

 

[Faggot Boqposter]

Not to mention his chairs are fucking worthless so law enforcement wouldn't waste their/taxpayer time investigating this stupid, drunk frat boy prank bullshit.

If he stopped posting all of his life online no one would have anything to fuck with online, or in person. Stop replying, stop engaging, stop feeding the trolls, and lock down your social media. He has never once tried this, so he obviously enjoys the attention.

Wrong as always, stlaker. The chairs had enormous emotional value to me. Therefore, this was intentional infliction of emotional distress, incitement to terrorism, and conspiracy. And you are guilty of each and every count. And many, many more. Enjoy prison.

 

[quasi101]

Not to mention his chairs are fucking worthless so law enforcement wouldn't waste their/taxpayer time investigating this stupid, drunk frat boy prank bullshit.

If he stopped posting all of his life online no one would have anything to fuck with online, or in person. Stop replying, stop engaging, stop feeding the trolls, and lock down your social media. He has never once tried this, so he obviously enjoys the attention.

Well i mean yeah that's a given. The cops won't look into actual crimes though. I mean hypothetically even in some fantasy land where the cops invested every single thing even then there's nothing to pursue. I checked a few more:

CRIMINAL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY:

• https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/files/criminal/1400.pdf

Nothing there, as that seems to apply to things that can't be moved.


1481 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY :

• https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/files/criminal/1481.pdf

This is potentially the one here. I'd have to look more into what concealing means. I doubt it means that you have to dox yourself to a lunatic and spend your own money to bring him back his dumb shit.

When the property was (received) (concealed), the defendant knew that it was
stolen property

Possession of Recently Stolen Property:

• https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/files/criminal/0173.pdf

It is evident that mere possession of stolen goods by a party accused ought not to be in every case, if
in any, sufficient evidence to justify a conviction. Take the case of a reputable citizen, whose
character is such that no suspicion of crime has attached to him, charged with stealing a horse, and
the only proof is that the horse was found, the next morning after he was stolen, in his stable, the
stable being one which could be entered without the aid of the accused. Clearly in such a case the
presumption of innocence would outweigh the inference of guilt arising out of the fact of possession.

thats from 1880. 19th century niggas be predicting this stupid pigs squealing.