- Forum Clout
- 80,834
It would be a real shame if a video recorded by Niki was a key piece of evidence to rule in the MPD's favor.I can't wait until this gets played in the court room
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
It would be a real shame if a video recorded by Niki was a key piece of evidence to rule in the MPD's favor.I can't wait until this gets played in the court room
Did they barge in, grab him, then stand him outside on his porch? No, so wouldn't he have come to the door and they then ordered him outside onto the porch?There are some differences to pats case from the one I posted but she leaned heavy into the " handcuffed naked" and I think Pat will too. For the lady, they were serving a warrant ( rammed the door open) on someone that hasnt lived there for 4 years so there were some real mistakes made by the police from the start. Where in pats case they were at the correct location the call requested and were just following procedure. I just think pat is going to claim "damages" from being handcuffed with his pee pee out after answering the door without putting shorts/pants on.
Excellent pointNo one in his life likes him
Except active pedophile rapists, I forgot to addExcellent point
There are some differences to pats case from the one I posted but she leaned heavy into the " handcuffed naked" and I think Pat will too. For the lady, they were serving a warrant ( rammed the door open) on someone that hasnt lived there for 4 years so there were some real mistakes made by the police from the start. Where in pats case they were at the correct location the call requested and were just following procedure. I just think pat is going to claim "damages" from being handcuffed with his pee pee out after answering the door without putting shorts/pants on.
Oh, I've seen this movie!He wants to get this officer the sack by any means necessary.
It would be amazing if he got millions from this but still spent every waking minute on Twitter replying to us while Nikki spent the money.I remembered an old case that I think pat is hoping his case plays out in a similar fashion.
View attachment 185920
It would be amazing if he got millions from this
I hate to think of Pat as a Sex Haver and I don't want to tell people what to wear around the house - it's none of my business - but for God's sake, keep some sweatpants around and don't think you get to answer the front door practically nude.Did they barge in, grab him, then stand him outside on his porch? No, so wouldn't he have come to the door and they then ordered him outside onto the porch?
If they pulled him from his bedroom to the outside while he was getting his robe on I can understand why he was standing on the porch without it being belted. But I think the true scenario is he came to the door with his robe open on purpose. He's into things as you know. Sick guy!
It's apples and bowling balls, Tony.-In Patricks case police didn’t burst into his home. They knocked on his door and detained Patrick outside, THEN searched his home.
-As you stated, in Patricks case the police responded to a call to his home where a threat was made. In Shaniquas case here, there was no call and the warrant itself was a mistake. Hell it wasn’t even the right address.
Okay, seriously. What the fuck is going on with people quoting and not ribbing your post. THIS USED TO BE A NICE NEIGHBOURHOOD!!!
He was wearing his robe naked because he knew they were comingI hate to think of Pat as a Sex Haver and I don't want to tell people what to wear around the house - it's none of my business - but for God's sake, keep some sweatpants around and don't think you get to answer the front door practically nude.
What Rick wears answering the door should be considered lewd misconduct towards Trick Or Treating kids or scout girls trying to sell cookies.
Throw the book at this bastard already, I say!
It's apples and bowling balls, Tony.
But even in forgetting all of this, he claims he's been "SWATTed". I think not even once this has happened, so his case is bullshit. He also happens to be fat.
I actually never thought about that. He was purposely naked so he could make it an element of the story to make the swattings sound ever worse.He was wearing his robe naked because he knew they were coming
Bingo.I actually never thought about that. He was purposely naked so he could make it an element of the story to make the swattings sound ever worse.
Also they never busted into his house once during this whole thing. There’s no reason he couldn’t have put some fucking pants on before answering the door. That was his choice.There are some differences to pats case from the one I posted but she leaned heavy into the " handcuffed naked" and I think Pat will too. For the lady, they were serving a warrant ( rammed the door open) on someone that hasnt lived there for 4 years so there were some real mistakes made by the police from the start. Where in pats case they were at the correct location the call requested and were just following procedure. I just think pat is going to claim "damages" from being handcuffed with his pee pee out after answering the door without putting shorts/pants on.
He was wearing his robe naked because he knew they were coming
You answered your own question, Bapster. He doesn't mind being humiliated (he's been at this for five years, or about fourteen if you count the Lappening) as long as he can grift for money and attention.Here's something else to schinkle about: if Pat was so humilated with regards to being escorted naked outside while the police searched his home, then why did he willingly send CCTV of said situation to the news outlets?
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/