reason 1/1,000,000 why Niki Robinson is a piece of shit

[Juschippinyababe]

Fuck this cunt. Hope Tedarrius leaves a gasser in her that turns septic

 

[SensibleKeks]

Well Nicole had just been informed that she owed more than 11k. Yet she wrote a letter specifically stating that the check represents the "full satisfaction of the judgement"

... there's some contention about the law here. It might be the case that if you cash a check for less than the judgement you have "agreed" to the full amount. Even writing "under protest" or something on the check may not be enough.

The article you posted does a good job explaining the "accord and satisfaction" laws.

Under Wisconsin law:

Wisconsin Legislature: 403.311(3)(a)2.

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

For a debt to be settled completely under section (2) the following would need to be met:

(3)(b) claimant didn't try returning the insufficient funds within 90 days to avoid "accord and satisfaction"

(4) debtor has to prove claimant agreed to those conditions of the debt

But I'm just a simple Sandwich Artisan at Panera so that's my dumb interpretation of the law. Based on previous court precedence, her letter stating the debt is "fully satisfied" wouldn't hold up in court.

In 2002, a case regarding this law was ruled by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. The defendant claimed that since check with "paid in full" was cashed, the plaintiff agreed that the debt was satisfied and had no grounds for the full payment. It's a bit more complicated of course, but the courts ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

Hribar Trucking, Inc. v. HMB Contractors, Inc.

www.wicourts.gov

Seems like the lawyer advising Niki gave her terrible advice. Call me crazy, but I don't think Pat and Niki hire competent lawyers.

Also it's Niki, not Nicole. Enjoy prison stlaker.

 

[quasi101]

The article you posted does a good job explaining the "accord and satisfaction" laws.

Under Wisconsin law:

Wisconsin Legislature: 403.311(3)(a)2.

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

For a debt to be settled completely under section (2) the following would need to be met:

(3)(b) claimant didn't try returning the insufficient funds within 90 days to avoid "accord and satisfaction"

(4) debtor has to prove claimant agreed to those conditions of the debt

But I'm just a simple Sandwich Artisan at Panera so that's my dumb interpretation of the law. Based on previous court precedence, her letter stating the debt is "fully satisfied" wouldn't hold up in court.

In 2002, a case regarding this law was ruled by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. The defendant claimed that since check with "paid in full" was cashed, the plaintiff agreed that the debt was satisfied and had no grounds for the full payment. It's a bit more complicated of course, but the courts ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

Hribar Trucking, Inc. v. HMB Contractors, Inc.

www.wicourts.gov

Seems like the lawyer advising Niki gave her terrible advice. Call me crazy, but I don't think Pat and Niki hire competent lawyers.

Also it's Niki, not Nicole. Enjoy prison stlaker.

since the debt was in California originally its the california laws. If you read the same article its much more up in the air in California.

 

[SensibleKeks]

since the debt was in California originally its the california laws. If you read the same article its much more up in the air in California.

Gotcha. Well that's why I work at Panera and not one of these fancy law firms. Devil I'd in the details.

 

[Chive Turkey]

When she married Patty she was very fat (that poor DeLorean) and now she is less fat so she probably met him while she was depressed.

Definitely, and likely still is 'depressed'. She lost a fuckton of weight since then and we all know they're not active or eat healthily as a couple. Medication for shit like ADD already suppresses appetite to a large degree, I'd imagine whatever shit she's on does the same.

 

[quasi101]

Definitely, and likely still is 'depressed'. She lost a fuckton of weight since then and we all know they're not active or eat healthily as a couple. Medication for shit like ADD already suppresses appetite to a large degree, I'd imagine whatever shit she's on does the same.

She's probably on SNRIs instead of SSRIs

 

[fuckwit]

She's barren, thus worthless. That's basically all I ever needed to know about her.

 

[Ronnie G]

@quasi101 is conveniently leaving out the nudes Niki sent as compensation for the extra funds – nice try with the slander though.

 

[Blurry Niki Enthusiast]

Further proof Niki is an asshole - now we know it’s clear she wrote this nonsense
View attachment 191403

She is insufferable.

 

[CompoundBasement]

She is insufferable.

No, "wellbeings" isn't a word, low I.Q. dumbass. It's "wellbeing" or "well-being". Imagine hiring this fucking retard to write shit for you.

 

[firstimelongtime]

No, "wellbeings" isn't a word, low I.Q. dumbass. It's "wellbeing" or "well-being". Imagine hiring this fucking retard to write shit for you.

Maybe they have starkly different definitions of well-being. He needs to get angry, stay angry, and she just wants to be farted in, in peace.

 

[Lamont & Tonelli]

She is insufferable.

 

[Stent]

Not to elbow @quasi101 out as professor of logic at the Academy of Science . .

The Bhagavad Gita has an a priori heuristic with which one can assign the appropriate degree of fault based upon a supposition of an individuals mental state under which true malice can be determined.

"From passion comes confusion of mind, then loss of remembrance, the forgetting of duty. From this loss comes the ruin of reason, and the ruin of reason leads man to destruction."

It's clear that for reasons having to do with substance abuse, mental illness and a total lack of impulse control Patrick is in a constant state of confusion of mind and the results are clear.

On the other hand Niki does not obsessively reply to stlakers. While she may lack impulse control regarding her medication it's nothing like what Pat regularly exhibits. It can therefore be supposed that Niki is in control of her faculties and is making these immoral choices after having, however briefly, considered them. If she were to take the path of duty she would either cure his behavior with care that he likely never received or leave that task to others and pursue her duty elsewhere. There are more ways than one to be an unfaithful wife.

TLDR Morality-wise: Pat>Niki

In the intricate tapestry of life, the obese man and his drug addict wife stand as two polar opposites, navigating the labyrinth of existence with their intertwined destinies. The weight of his physical form mirrors the burden of her substance abuse, both lost in the murky waters of their own limitations and desires. Yet, in their seemingly divergent paths, they find a strange unity, a cosmic dance of dependence and indulgence that speaks to the fragile balance of power and weakness within us all. As they forge ahead in their chaotic odyssey, they unknowingly unravel the threads of truth and illusion, ultimately realizing that in the paradox of their connection lies the key to transcendence and liberation from the gravitational pull of their own shortcomings.

 

[MonsterSteve]

Fuck this malignant CUNT!

 

[Titsucks]

SNRIs instead of SSRIs

Spicy Nigger Rectal Issuances?

 

[midwit]

I wonder if she rocks a bush to cover the herpes bumps.

I'd imagine she keeps it shaved and does the "love me for who I am, (literal) warts and all" bit.

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

[email protected], why does that email seem so familiar?

I’d ask many African American influencers with contact forms but she’s gaslighted them into thinking it was Brothermen and not her sending those messages from her email address.

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

Probably a good idea they didn't have kids. Their DNA must look like barbed wire.
Imagine the "homeless" kid they'd adopt. He'd long to be sliced on a pizza.
View attachment 191385

A home less kid would wish they were sleeping in an alley on a January night in Milwaukee after a hour in the hovel.

 

[The Sue Deal]

She is insufferable.

Yeah that sets a good precedent. So whats stopping me from emailing whoever shes emailing and claiming all good reviews on Pats books or her business are fake (without even explaining how they’re fake) and made in an effort to harass me. I should be able to get them taken down, right?

To use a zoomer word they are quite literally Karens. “I demand you take this review down” or what, babyboy? It’s like Patrick threatening the exterminator for having the gall to say he’s gonna bill him for a missed appointment.

 

[quasi101]

what are you doing to protect small businesses says the rectangle shaped lesbian as she tries to avoid paying her court ordered debt.