Pour one out for EVS. Patrick. Always. Wins.

[More Worser]

View attachment 144176

“Oh” is a pathetic, dishonest attempt to appear nonchalant and to lend credence to his lie that he doesn’t care that EVS exists. He does care, hence him posting about EVS’s ban.

Also, nice spelling SWAT with two T’s, stupid.

 

[guyincognito2.0]

My god you're retarded. Elon doing what he wants in favor of speech good, Elon blocking people because they spoke wrong bad. What created the PUs was community co-ops. Thats what electrified and provide phones in most rural areas, the dismissal of high per cost house passing in less dense areas, you fucking knucklehead. The local people pooled resources and created their own and the larger companies realized that was possible in many place bigger than farm towns and worked with the state to create USFs to offset high capital onlining of customers. That evolved into a concept that nobody should be denied and created the ubiquity that then became the reason that PUs were forced to not deny service. Many were private companies that then had rates set for them. Twitter and FB are communications companies at this point with broad customer bases. I disagree with places like Canada trying to force them to pay for content or large telecoms forcing them to pay extra for access and I disagree with them being able to deny EVS, you, me or even Pat to have an account and spout stupidity, given their massive reach and use of public networks to exist.

Really not to hard to concept. but you've displayed retardation in the past and a rush to "administer" others in their use of open discussion. This board is not like twitter, it's small and niche, paid for by a small owner, twitter is a large traded company. It exists in a very well known way as a place people can spout stupidity, that should be something that can't be denied to users. It's free, so make it pay system and then add a layer of choice that allows them claim it isn't universal access for free and maybe it changes it use, but for now it is a place that should never ban users acting lawfully.

This dude sounds like a pinko commie. Where’s Joe McCarthy when you need him?

 

[Ethan P. Schulman]

Knives are out! Doesnt matter. This is going to be the best week ever.

 

[Officer Chase]

Do you despise jews’ subversion of our nation, people, and culture, and families, but you’ll defend to the death their right to do so?

Of course I do and they're the reason speech became unfree and companies benefitting be favorable legislation regulate just one sides speech without worry. I'd prefer they say whatever they want and I counter it rather than they silence me while telling people the mere speech of some is worse than their actual violence. I'm shocked by the number of people here too stupid to understand why Twitter banning anybody is ever good. Just ignore what you don't like. I've never had a twitter account that wasn't used to troll Pat, so I certainly don't need to tweet, but why my trolling isn't allowed is something I don't understand. Worse yet, is why posters here defend that type of action by twitter.

 

[Officer Chase]

This dude sounds like a pinko commie. Where’s Joe McCarthy when you need him?

Yea Joe was busy blowing Roy Cohn so he didn't worry that his worldview wasn't as dissimilar to the commies as it was to the founders. Seriously if every business could deny service to whomever it chose, I'd not think twitter bans were as bad, but even under Elon twitter bans still favor the faggots.

 

[ElectricLightKazooII]

This dude sounds like a pinko commie. Where’s Joe McCarthy when you need him?

McCarthy, in classic Wisconsin fashion, drank himself to death at 48. Won't be seein' him no more.

 

[WifeStoreWill]

. Worse yet, is why posters here defend that type of action by twitter.

No one is defending it, retard. Everyone here agrees Twitter and their rules are super gay. What we’re saying is we don’t want the government stepping in and telling them what they have to allow on their privately owned website.

Why is that so hard to understand? If you don’t like twitter’s policies then you don’t have to use Twitter. I can’t believe you of all people are on here advocating for more government regulations. Don’t you think it’s weird that not one person is on your side on this? Are you going to go march (tweet) with SFWA and the other libtards?

 

[Officer Chase]

No one is defending it, retard. Everyone here agrees Twitter and their rules are super gay. What we’re saying is we don’t want the government stepping in and telling them what they have to allow on their privately owned website.

Why is that so hard to understand? If you don’t like twitter’s policies then you don’t have to use Twitter. I can’t believe you of all people are on here advocating for more government regulations. Don’t you think it’s weird that not one person is on your side on this? Are you going to go march (tweet) with SFWA and the other libtards?

So you're good with ISPs and DDOS services denying access to just some too? Twitter, FB, Instagram and the like benefit from equal access rules despite their traffic, the benefit from regulation protecting them from being able to be sued for content, yet they moderate some content they don't like, meanwhile a hotel must rent to niggers, yea twitter is special I guess. I'm advocating for less regulation, just equal access to their platform due to its ubiquity and use of others services without hinderance itself. When and if a hotel can no longer rent a room to niggers twitter should be able to ban people. Until then they operate in a way similar to telecoms and should also be prevented from limiting legal content. That's the only regulation I agree with, equal access, it's almost as if that is constitutionally protected.

As for what has been revealed here, many of you are paranoid about the state but OK with corporate entities using state regulations to benefit but ignoring the constitution to silence one side and the state openly encouraging it. The fact that a largely uneducated body of people don't agree with me about a field I worked in doesn't motivate me to change my mind. You have no idea what you're talking about. Twitter operates as a telecom albeit a clec or reseller, but treats its users like it was small store when they hold the wrong opinions.

Lastly, the fact that SFWA is now upset that they no longer have exclusive benefit of Twitters censors doesn't impress me either. I'd rather lefties talk more and be heard more, so long as the other side can too. I fear no ideas or speech on a web platform, twitter doesn't make me safer by being less free. You seem to posit that trading freedom of speech is a proof of freedom. When you serve the public, you shouldn't determine who gets served based on their politics or words. I'm shocked you are so fragile and gay.

 

[WifeStoreWill]

So you're good with ISPs and DDOS services denying access to just some too? Twitter, FB, Instagram and the like benefit from equal access rules despite their traffic, the benefit from regulation protecting them from being able to be sued for content, yet they moderate some content they don't like, meanwhile a hotel must rent to niggers, yea twitter is special I guess. I'm advocating for less regulation, just equal access to their platform due to its ubiquity and use of others services without hinderance itself. When and if a hotel can no longer rent a room to niggers twitter should be able to ban people. Until then they operate in a way similar to telecoms and should also be prevented from limiting legal content. That's the only regulation I agree with, equal access, it's almost as if that is constitutionally protected.

As for what has been revealed here, many of you are paranoid about the state but OK with corporate entities using state regulations to benefit but ignoring the constitution to silence one side and the state openly encouraging it. The fact that a largely uneducated body of people don't agree with me about a field I worked in doesn't motivate me to change my mind. You have no idea what you're talking about. Twitter operates as a telecom albeit a clec or reseller, but treats its users like it was small store when they hold the wrong opinions.

Lastly, the fact that SFWA is now upset that they no longer have exclusive benefit of Twitters censors doesn't impress me either. I'd rather lefties talk more and be heard more, so long as the other side can too. I fear no ideas or speech on a web platform, twitter doesn't make me safer by being less free. You seem to posit that trading freedom of speech is a proof of freedom. When you serve the public, you shouldn't determine who gets served based on their politics or words. I'm shocked you are so fragile and gay.

Tldr

 

[More Worser]

Of course I do and they're the reason speech became unfree and companies benefitting be favorable legislation regulate just one sides speech without worry.

You realize the problem but you insist that we should keep having it.

I'd prefer they say whatever they want and I counter it

How's that working out for you?

The idea that we should not behave like our enemies (who are clearly winning) and should keep up our losing strategy, is nonsensical.

Speech should not be free; saying certain things should not be allowed, especially by our enemies. Jews should not have been allowed to spread transgenderism, anti-racism, anti-Whitism, communism, the black civil rights movement, feminism, porn, etc.

Twitter would be fantastic if their censorship cut through other way.

 

[Chive Turkey]

"The world would be amazing if my team was the only one allowed to have opinions."

Easy on the groundbreaking political philosophy there, Montesgoo.

I thought the Jews controlled everything and every right wing figure is a plant so I'm not sure how advocating for even more state control of people's lives by those types isn't just tripping over the same stone again.

 

[Steve Ramone]

This post went from 0 to gay in 4 pages.

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

Fuck you’re dumb. Twitter is akin to a public utility? Get the fuck out of here.

Keep on being a useful idiot for the left, I guess..

 

[Harry's Enticer]

This post went from 0 to gay in 4 pages.

4 times longer than usual

 

[Officer Chase]

You realize the problem but you insist that we should keep having it.


How's that working out for you?

The idea that we should not behave like our enemies (who are clearly winning) and should keep up our losing strategy, is nonsensical.

Speech should not be free; saying certain things should not be allowed, especially by our enemies. Jews should not have been allowed to spread transgenderism, anti-racism, anti-Whitism, communism, the black civil rights movement, feminism, porn, etc.

Twitter would be fantastic if their censorship cut through other way.

I wasted way too much time explaining how twitter is very much like a telecom and how telecoms and power companies became what we know as public utilities. It's about broad based service and user use choices being the user's actual choice. I worked in that field, dealt with right of ways, consumer complaints, approved use and the like. Twitter is very much like an ILEC for it's users, it's hard to find a replacement and while it's very gay to claim twitter is a necessity because it isn't for me, for those who feel it is, losing access is very similar to AT&T saying no phone for you, because you said nigger to a friend on a party line.

I agree that only one side gets to write the narrative and the other side can't "right" the narrative, but that's how censorship works. The things you talk of became the narrative because they silence the traditional voices little by little. Wouldn't it be better we all had protected speech on broad platforms? Or do you prefer these companies get a liability waiver on anti-white hate and silence anti-darkie hate proudly? It seems that a guy saying speech shouldn't be free would eventually find fault with everybody and try to punish the conscience of people he even mostly agrees with at certain times.

 

[Officer Chase]

Keep on being a useful idiot for the left, I guess..

Yea because blocks, bans, and deplatforming is used on the left? That's exactly my point. I realize Jerk Store J is a baby boy who takes pictures with overpriced underwhelming hot sauce with a fleck of truffle in it, so it is pointless to even continue this, but take heart in knowing he wants ISPs to deny you internet access because they own the company despite tons of tax dollars and favorable legislation creating their use class and business model. Either the internet is public or its not.

Edit: Like a baby boy he car crashed me again....muh secret forum... muh leadership on a troll board. Get a job you bum.

 

[WifeStoreWill]

I wasted way too much time explaining how twitter is very much like a telecom and how telecoms and power companies became what we know as public utilities. It's about broad based service and user use choices being the user's actual choice. I worked in that field, dealt with right of ways, consumer complaints, approved use and the like. Twitter is very much like an ILEC for it's users, it's hard to find a replacement and while it's very gay to claim twitter is a necessity because it isn't for me, for those who feel it is, losing access is very similar to AT&T saying no phone for you, because you said nigger to a friend on a party line.

I agree that only one side gets to write the narrative and the other side can't "right" the narrative, but that's how censorship works. The things you talk of became the narrative because they silence the traditional voices little by little. Wouldn't it be better we all had protected speech on broad platforms? Or do you prefer these companies get a liability waiver on anti-white hate and silence anti-darkie hate proudly? It seems that a guy saying speech shouldn't be free would eventually find fault with everybody and try to punish the conscience of people he even mostly agrees with at certain times.

We all understand perfectly what you were saying so you don’t have to keep repeating it. We just disagree because it’s retarded.

There’s a million alternatives to Twitter if you want to communicate with people on the internet. There’s not a million different power lines bringing electricity to your house. Just because Twitter is the biggest and most popular app doesn’t make it anything like a utility. Hope this helps.

 

[WifeStoreWill]

I realize Jerk Store J is a baby boy who takes pictures with overpriced underwhelming hot sauce with a fleck of truffle in it,

Never heard of him

so it is pointless to even continue this,

It is

but take heart in knowing he wants ISPs to deny you internet access because they own the company despite tons of tax dollars and favorable legislation creating their use class and business model. Either the internet is public or its not.

Twitter isn’t the internet. I never said anything about ISPs, that’s a totally different argument. They actually are like utilities.

Edit: Like a baby boy he car crashed me again....muh secret forum...

Crying over internet points is Redditor behavior. Have some pride.

Get a job you bum.

I’m actually sitting in my office getting paid to respond to you right now.

 

[Officer Chase]

Yes you have.

Agreed

It would have been really cool if you could support anything you say with something case specific to the point you state. Hurr durr isps are like utilites, child twitter isn't , you aren't owed an explanation,

I don't give a shit and it's why I car crashed the one post you made and not all of them, it was the content. Sorry I called you out, redditor.

No you're not, you're really not. As you notice I'm dark for many hours most days,

This post is a reference to pat styled replying. Now get a job.

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

Yea because blocks, bans, and deplatforming is used on the left? That's exactly my point. I realize Jerk Store J is a baby boy who takes pictures with overpriced underwhelming hot sauce with a fleck of truffle in it, so it is pointless to even continue this, but take heart in knowing he wants ISPs to deny you internet access because they own the company despite tons of tax dollars and favorable legislation creating their use class and business model. Either the internet is public or its not.

Edit: Like a baby boy he car crashed me again....muh secret forum... muh leadership on a troll board. Get a job you bum.

I was responding to Uncle j with that