• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Pour one out for EVS. Patrick. Always. Wins.

RickReternal

I hope people Ouija you tweets after your dead
Forum Clout
50,053
Why us?

IMG_0991.jpeg
 

Will Tate

Oven March
Forum Clout
42,633
EVS lost his twitter; Pat still has his.
EVS still has a successful business based on his own creator-owned intellectual property, millions of dollars, a beautiful family who loves him, a dedicated fanbase, a Tony Soprano house in Jersey without a lien on it, a pool, a firepit and patio chairs he can actually use...; Pat has...?
Oh, and 24 hours after this I've already seen several accounts calling for Ethan's account to be reinstated, for whatever that's worth; Pat's number 1 fan didn't even know when Pat got the boot from Twitter.
So keep looking down your fat nose at your betters, you obnoxious failure, you do nothing but answer your own question.
And you love to see it.

why us.jpeg
 

Officer Chase

My bad joke and illiteracy confused what I meant.
Forum Clout
4,134
Hasn't Patrick made the same arguments?
Pat has made them seeking a regulatory regime authored by the state, the only thing I want to see is the social media companies who rely on other companies to operate is for them to not ban or block anybody. It seems twitter is doing the no blocking part, hopefully they do the no banning. Content moderation is bad.
Sounds like SJW thinking if I'm being honest.
Really how so? What SJW has ever defended unregulated speech for all? Sounds to me like some of you guys like the deplatforming and refusal to service some of the cloudflare type companies. That should not be allowed. If I have to rent to a nigger I shouldn't be able to not rent to a nazi. Pretty simple shit, no?
 

Officer Chase

My bad joke and illiteracy confused what I meant.
Forum Clout
4,134
And this “Boomia” wouldn’t happen to be in the forum with us now, would he?
I don't hear any heavy breathing, so no. Isn't the lore that he weighs 500lbs and eats sticks of butter as a snack.

As an astute watcher of Rick I can say I've never seen Boomia care much about his twitter but I do know @FurBurger has gargled both semen and chinky-jew sauce.

I'm guessing Boomia is probably eating ring dings with his obese children right about now. Or maybe those bear paw things the Canadians eat.
 
G

guest

Guest
From what I see of Boomia's twitter it's just trolling, were you trolling us non-simps when you took your 5th vaxx shot to stop a mild cold? Is there some Boomia twitter account that doesn't pretty much troll people or did I miss something?
Patrick trolled Boomia so hard that he made Boomia go build his own ugly, uncomfortable chairs. The Patman records another big W.
 
Forum Clout
3,920
No you don't need any of those things, but it's about ubiquity and usage. People do use twitter, facebook, and others as communication tools. They are user choice and if those companies want sec 230 to protect them, short of criminal conduct they should remain unmoderated. If they moderate them, they accept the permissibility of some speech while rejecting other lawful speech. They deny service universality while claiming they aren't responsible for content which is a lie.

It's just different views, but nobody needs to be thrown off of twitter or denied access unless those platforms want to establish conduct as their responsibility. Arguing in favor of regulation is plain ignorant. Even if the regulation is cloaked in business freedom, it's still state permitted censorship. If they were subscription services or limited to class of user restrictions based on lawful selective association it would be different, but when Mewler and Beavis can have accounts it's pretty much not the case.
images (6)~2 (1).jpeg
 

More Worser

Not Mexican. Not jewish. NOT bald.😡
Forum Clout
7,706
the only reason they should need to deny you is because Elon feels like it. Doesn’t mean I agree but it’s his site, he paid for it. If he doesn’t want you to say something on his faggot website then that’s his business.

It has absolutely no similarity to utilities, which provide necessary services and most of the time in a monopoly.
Do you despise jews’ subversion of our nation, people, and culture, and families, but you’ll defend to the death their right to do so?
 
Top