• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 3

G

guest

Guest
gee I hope nobody takes the grand total he owes, then starts telling him different luxury items he could have bought instead

1.) 20,000 pairs of white sunglasses
2.) Ford Focus
3.) Liposuction
Brewers season tickets behind home plate for 4 years, includes full buffet every game. Or decent outfield box seats for about 14 years.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://mktg.mlbstatic.com/brewers/documents/tickets/ticket-plans-pricing-full-season-renewal.pdf[/URL]
 

JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS

DMANIAC
Forum Clout
52,693
Real nice, Patrick. Congratulations to you for voluntarily bringing the legal system into your life for a case you were never going to win and an amount you could never afford.

Which is why you’re trying not to pay it. The problem with that sweetie, is that the legal system is involved and they have the receipts. They know what you owe and they expect you to pay because that’s what they told you to do.

But I’m sure they’ll be fine with you just not paying. They’ve never gotten mad at people for not doing what they say.
 

TorquieTwoBeers

Forum Clout
29,443
Hey Pat, if you never filed your frivolous lawsuit, you could have used that money--plus what you now owe Quasi--to buy a 1968 Ford Mustang GT Fastback. You know, the actual type of car Steve McQueen drove in Bullitt and not your shitty 6 cylinder rust bucket. Too bad, I guess. What a fucking idiot.

 
  • Deleted by N/A
Show…

SFWA liaison

Heidi Hildeman customer
Forum Clout
101,593
Wow. Is this legally binding like the judgement or just being claimed by Rahul?
The pig can contest it and try to convince a judge that pursuing the SFWA subpoena wasn't "reasonable and necessary" to enforce the judgement. That's the standard to determine whether creditor is or isn't entitled to it.

Pig's lack of cooperation doesn't help his case, but I wonder if he can use the fact that the subpoena was deemed "overbroad" by the courts to attack it's reasonableness. I also wonder if Pig has to contest it within a certain period of time.

In any case it'll cost him money lol get fucked pigger
 
Top