I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 2

[BakersfieldChimp]

Not to be a downer, but I don't think that's likely. There was no response filed to the initial quash, the update in January, or the most recent filing. Unless the court is more than a week behind (which is possible) this would be ex parte. Rick would be paying the dmv attorney to show up, say they didn't file a response after 11 months, that they withdrew the underlying complaint, and already lost in SF..and then hope for an extension.

I would assume a default judgement on the 6th.

Would I be correct in assuming default judgements result in the loser paying the legal fees of the other party?

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

Would I be correct in assuming default judgements result in the loser paying the legal fees of the other party?

Yes.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

Yes.

Well, everyone, get your 'oopsie doodles' ready.

 

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

Not to be a downer, but I don't think that's likely. There was no response filed to the initial quash, the update in January, or the most recent filing. Unless the court is more than a week behind (which is possible) this would be ex parte. Rick would be paying the dmv attorney to show up, say they didn't file a response after 11 months, that they withdrew the underlying complaint, and already lost in SF..and then hope for an extension.

I would assume a default judgement on the 6th.

If paying an attorney to be there is the dumbest possible move then I certainly wouldn’t rule it out.

 

[Stent]

I know Joe Biden is still busy after January 6th but this is something he really needs to get eyes on.

 

[Mr-Wrinkle-Paws]

If paying an attorney to be there is the dumbest possible move then I certainly wouldn’t rule it out.

There was that recent SeTTlemenT talk so he had to pay something

 

[guest]

There was that recent SeTTlemenT talk so he had to pay something

I wonder how those talks went down. Normally 2 opposing parties come to a settlement to avoid expensive legal battles, but in this case Fatrick is required by law to pay the opposing side's legal fees

 

[Mr-Wrinkle-Paws]

I wonder how those talks went down. Normally 2 opposing parties come to a settlement to avoid expensive legal battles, but in this case Fatrick is required by law to pay the opposing side's legal fees

Like somebody had said before its a last ditch effort by tubbos lawyer to save some type of money, they could also say shit like will request a payment plan that lasts ten or more years or settle with us now and get paid within a year

 

[BudDickman]

Like somebody had said before its a last ditch effort by tubbos lawyer to save some type of money, they could also say shit like will request a payment plan that lasts ten or more years or settle with us now and get paid within a year

Pat has already said that he has no intention to pay, and he is fucking broke anyway so why would Quasi believe that he would be willing to comply with the terms of a settlement?

 

[guest]

Pat has already said that he has no intention to pay, and he is fucking broke anyway so why would Quasi believe that he would be willing to comply with the terms of a settlement?

PATRICK: My counteroffer is you drop all requests for payment, and I in turn will not re-file and sue you and the other cyberstlakers again.

QUASI:
[MEDIA=youtube]KT4xKZx5_Yw[/MEDIA]

 

[Mr-Wrinkle-Paws]

Pat has already said that he has no intention to pay, and he is fucking broke anyway so why would Quasi believe that he would be willing to comply with the terms of a settlement?

He will have to pay when its ordered it might take him 40 years

 

[FurBurger]

It's a shame we won't be seeing The Blobfish Attorney; I'd like to have seen him having his shit pushed in again by both the judge and then Señor Peña coming in off the top rope with The People's Horsecock.

 

[guest]

I tried to call the court but clerks office goes to voicemail. So instead I emailed the civil court and clerks office asking for hearing access and/or transcripts. I'll keep everyone posted.

 

[Guest]

I tried to call the court but clerks office goes to voicemail. So instead I emailed the civil court and clerks office asking for hearing access and/or transcripts. I'll keep everyone posted.

God bless. Thanks for your hard work brotherman

 

[guest]

Not to be a downer, but I don't think that's likely. There was no response filed to the initial quash, the update in January, or the most recent filing. Unless the court is more than a week behind (which is possible) this would be ex parte. Rick would be paying the dmv attorney to show up, say they didn't file a response after 11 months, that they withdrew the underlying complaint, and already lost in SF..and then hope for an extension.

I would assume a default judgement on the 6th.

I think I missed this the first time. Here is Mr. Rosenfeld stating that a response was due on the 24th. That would be 10 court days before the hearing. Seems odd to me that someone constantly complaining about the courts being unfair didn't file a response.

 

[Robert's Gift to Patty]

I think I missed this the first time. Here is Mr. Rosenfeld stating that a response was due on the 24th. That would be 10 court days before the hearing. Seems odd to me that someone constantly complaining about the courts being unfair didn't file a response.



View attachment 33173

Question: if he just ignores this and puts his fingers in his ears and screams, will it go away?

 

[DominusOdium]

Maybe next time just don't feed the trolls and then try to sue them for calling you and your dumb wife mean names.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

Sounds like this should be pretty quick tomorrow.

 

[guest]

The tentative ruling is posted

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.scscourt.org/online_services/tentatives/tentative_rulings_Dept20.shtml[/URL]

There's also a zoom link but if the opposing side doesn't contest, then there won't be a hearing.

 

[guest]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://scuDOTzoom.us/j/96144427712?pwd=cW1JYmg5dTdsc3NKNFBpSjlEam5xUT09[/URL]

Meeting ID: 961 4442 7712

2 Password: 017350

Join by phone: +1 (669) 900-6833 Meeting ID: 961 4442 7712