I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 2

[Mike Glyer]

I'm just a technical administrator here. But that seems unlikely. If you look at the dates he would have been trying to settle around the time he was gambling in Vegas and tweeting that he was never gonna pay and didn't owe a thing.

That sounds like a clinically retarded thing to do on his part. It's going to be amazing when this fat chicken comes half-home to roost fatly.

 

[guest]

[URL='https://imgbb.com/']

[/URL]

EL TIGRE IS BACK, BABY!!!!

 

[Mitch Weaver]

EL TIGRE IS BACK, BABY!!!!

He never went anywhere, niño. He’s always been in our hearts.

 

[guest]

Looks like some updates to the google quash.

View attachment 32052


A few interesting things in these documents. 6k was added to the 5k for fees.


View attachment 32053


Bringing the total to 11k.


View attachment 32054


Also, if you look at the memorandum of costs you can see some of the time spent.

Someone was trying to settle...


View attachment 32056

I wonder if he'd rather take the points or the fine this time.

The poinTs, sir... iT's buT a Trivial amounT.

 

[TorqueWheeler]

If Rahul could get that Pat guy behind bars or take the house or Susan, that'd be great.

But what about the other $35,000?

 

[guest]

If anyone is having trouble with the website, I got it to work by setting my VPN to a California server.

 

[guest]

I don’t get what there even is to settle in this case? Drop the subpoena and the lawyer fees stop racking up, that’s all there is to it. Why would Quasi accept less than full reimbursement for his fees? As far as I know he’s not going for anything more than just getting his costs covered, which he is entitled to by law.

the case is already over so what even is the point of the subpoena?

 

[guest]

By the way, does anyone have the full CA court video with the beginning parts where they are checking people in? Asking for a friend..

 

[guest]

the case is already over so what even is the point of the subpoena?

The answer is on Mama Raven's refrigerator.

#DLTIW

 

[stealthygeek]

By the way, does anyone have the full CA court video with the beginning parts where they are checking people in? Asking for a friend..

This is from traffic court but I'm pretty sure it's what you're looking for.




Here's the other court videos:

Fat Court: The Tomlinson vs John Doe Video Archive – Thomas Apostle Investigations

apostlegate.net

 

[guest]

This is from traffic court but I'm pretty sure it's what you're looking for.

[MEDIA=youtube]WP146_MDEAI[/MEDIA]


Here's the other court videos:
[URL unfurl="true"]https://apostlegate.net/fat-court-the-tomlinson-vs-john-doe-video-archive/[/URL]

Nope, pretty sure it was from one of the CA cases when we were watching that dopey Asian guy in the earlier case. The Apostlegate videos start after all that.

 

[guest]

Nope, pretty sure it was from one of the CA cases when we were watching that dopey Asian guy in the earlier case. The Apostlegate videos start after all that.

It is in Fistful of Rupees I think if you mean where that chinese lady is saying "Yusuf Kumiyah do you need checking in?".
Somewhere like 5 minutes in.

Or at the start of For Few Rupees More where based Schulman doesnt let Phat Pat in.

 

[guest]

It is in Fistful of Rupees I think if you mean where that chinese lady is saying "Yusuf Kumiyah do you need checking in?".
Somewhere like 5 minutes in.

Or at the start of For Few Rupees More where based Schulman doesnt let Phat Pat in.

Yeah, you’re right. Tyfys

 

[guest]

Yeah, you’re right. Tyfys

6:45 for Mr Tetley and Mr Carpianelli, 2900 for scared chinese lawyer.

 

[FurBurger]

It would have to, I think. What possible settlement could Patrick offer Quasi?

My first thought was a rusty trombone from Pat, and a go on Nikki's fartlocker.

Knowing Pat, though, he just offered Quasi the chase to surrender and to eat his own costs.

I'm just a technical administrator here. But that seems unlikely. If you look at the dates he would have been trying to settle around the time he was gambling in Vegas and tweeting that he was never gonna pay and didn't owe a thing.

I can't wait to hear Pat explaining the thought process behind that to a bankruptcy judge.


I wonder - if SFWA are funding the lolsuit, does that make them party to it? Can Quasi go after them for the rest of his money?

 

[guest]

Anyone saying that Pat doesnt support minorities is an idiot.
He has given thousands to Lations, Jews and Asians in legal fees.

 

[guest]

I wonder - if SFWA are funding the lolsuit, does that make them party to it? Can Quasi go after them for the rest of his money?

No

 

[FurBurger]

No

I wonder why not?

Quasi's entitled to his money back, the Pig has no assets, and Quasi wouldn't have had to spend that money if SFWA had kept their kid-touching snouts out of it.

Is there a law forbidding it, or a court precedent? Because I don't think Pat's going appear in order to fight the notion, if Quasi took it to court.

Otherwise you end up with plaintiffs who are judgement proof, with nothing to lose if they lose.

 

[guest]

I wonder why not?

Quasi's entitled to his money back, the Pig has no assets, and Quasi wouldn't have had to spend that money if SFWA had kept their kid-touching snouts out of it.

Is there a law forbidding it, or a court precedent? Because I don't think Pat's going appear in order to fight the notion, if Quasi took it to court.

Otherwise you end up with plaintiffs who are judgement proof, with nothing to lose if they lose.

Because they aren’t part of the suit. Giving someone money doesn’t make you liable for what they do. It’s still Rick’s case, not theirs.

 

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

Because they aren’t part of the suit. Giving someone money doesn’t make you liable for what they do. It’s still Rick’s case, not theirs.

Did Gawker sue that guy who funded Hulks suit? Feels like the same precedence would apply