• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Uh oh, Jackie just pinned a new tweet

RobertMewler

Forum Clout
102,966
Some side notes from someone who doesn’t know dick about the law

Nor can it apply to any person. Look at Nadolski and see how his situation compares to the law as described here.

1.) Whoever travels…with the intent to…injure, harass, intimidate…another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that—
(A)places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to that person
(B) causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person…

Nadolski traveled to Wisconsin after harassing Pat and intimidating him. In doing this he placed Pat in reasonable fear for his safety and caused him emotional distress. And he couldn’t even get a restraining order against BDA. How about Dan? The guys travelled to Milwuakee and walked outside Patricks goddamn house filming it. Yet no charges against Dan despite his full info being out there.

I would say not even. The law she cited here mentions specific examples:
a.) ransom
b.) extortion through threats of physical harm
c.) genuine threats such as kidnapping or murder
d.) extortion through threats of property or reputation

Pat hasn’t even alleged these things. He’s never been held for ransom and never been extorted. The only thing that would apply would be C, threats, but this doesn’t cover “you’re fat” texts. That is not me saying you should text Pat because other federal or state laws could apply. But whatever shes citing here is useless.

I’m genuinely trying to figure how she could link this and this is all I can piece together:

“The statute is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful functions of any department of government.”

So maybe she could be referring to how the SWATting calls impede on the MPD / FBI’s jobs? But once again, we don’t do that here. So that wouldn’t be applicable to the forum. Only the SWATter who doesn’t seem to be here anyway.
Isn't Snackie the only who's come close to extortion when she threatened admin to shut the site down unless he wanted to be doxxed?
 

LoomisBuckby

He stinks and I don't like him
Forum Clout
1,671
Yes, she is definitely (N)ot (A) (L)awyer and persists in embarrassing herself pretending to be one. She seems to exclusively trap little jew men into relationships and fatherhood, so maybe that's where she gets her legal gravitas, but who knows. She's definitely not mentally well and could use a long break from social media.
I read her post of Counterman v Colorado on her blog. She’s genuinely retarded and doesn’t understand what the holding is. Yet she proceeds to confidently explain it to her readers as if they’re 8 year olds. Absolutely embarrassing.
 

LoomisBuckby

He stinks and I don't like him
Forum Clout
1,671
No one here is guilty of these. Even the people who text pat, which I would never do. If patrick didn't reply then there could be a case made, as his lawyers probably explained to him many hundreds, perhaps thousands of times. Of course if he didn't reply then people wouldn't text him.
You have been instructed many thousands of times to stop responding to kiwis, client.
Client, if don’t stop communicating with them you will have no case.
Enjoy jail, client.
 

SFWA liaison

Heidi Hildeman customer
Forum Clout
113,346
1691504425327.png

weird how these sites are a reliable source when she determines it helps her smelly narrative

1691504519720.png

lol it's "allegedly" now, manic episode over and she's already terrified of Gibney suing her
 

RickReternal

I hope people Ouija you tweets after your dead
Forum Clout
50,181
View attachment 141343
weird how these sites are a reliable source when she determines it helps her smelly narrative

View attachment 141344
lol it's "allegedly" now, manic episode over and she's already terrified of Gibney suing her
Doesn’t John Gibney III live in Oman?

Anyway, her recent tweets starting with the one that kicked this thread off make me hope that Jason, her boyfriend and father of her two bastards, is home. Those children won’t be fed or washed otherwise. She’s absolutely in rapt conversation with the microwave right now.

Edit
She’s suchhhh a Karen cunt. Cameo from the bald guy who Space Edge almost made cry.
IMG_0731.jpeg
 
Last edited:

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
258,178
She’s very stupid and smelly
IMG_9143.jpeg

If we’re all such stupid morons how come nobody here has been found guilty of the many crimes you claim we’ve committed? Hell, she claimed time was up almost 6 months ago.

Jackie hates us and the Kiwi’s because her ego is so big she can’t handle having groups of people laughing at her on two Internet forums she can’t shut down. With twitter she can block everyone she doesn’t like and go full IM TELLING!!! and report anything she doesn’t like. KF has much more heat due to being involved with allegedly actual crimes on but we’re just a little forum that people visit to have some laughs at public figures (and forum users) and have general discussions.

I know Dandy Dan isn’t everyone’s cup of tea but he put it well recently - separate the SWAT claims (which everyone here thinks the swat thing is stupid, whoever doing it should stop, and is not funny) and what you have is a comedy forum. We happen to use a good amount of “inappropriate language” but we can because this isn’t twitter, Facebook, etc.

TLDR Jackie is wacky and fat.
 

SFWA liaison

Heidi Hildeman customer
Forum Clout
113,346
HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN?
1691506414469.jpeg
anti-doxing anti-harassment xeeter, missing ever since Jackie put a random science teacher on blast with no evidence. And is now talking about involving Oman law enforecement (SWATTing) and dragging the teacher's wife into it as well.

it's almost as if he has no principles or a spine to stand up against members of their cult
 

FurBurger

What would you do for a Klondike bar?
Forum Clout
22,626
View attachment 141344
lol it's "allegedly" now, manic episode over and she's already terrified of Gibney suing her
Yeah, but she's the only one alleging it, so that doesn't help her legally at all.

Journalists use "allegedly" when someone else (usually the police) accuses someone of something, as it makes it clear that they're just reporting the accusation, not making it; and that stops them being sued. Jackie's just demonstrating that she doesn't know what she's doing.
 

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
258,178
IMG_9147.jpeg

Her credibility really goes out the window when she calls us - people that are supposed to be dangerous criminals according to her - “dumb as fuck”

She can’t stand us because we all laugh at her nonsense and point out she’s a dumb idiot LARPing as someone important so we deserve prison according to her. Same with Pat, their narcissism is insane.
 

DominusOdium

Owner/Operator of Liquor Gallery, Elizabeth NJ
Forum Clout
53,311
So, whenever these halftards (Hi Jackie, you look like you smell worse than a prison in Oman) think they've stumbled into some new loophole or definition of things that allows them to use the law to get their way, they say it ad nauseum. Jax is saying "single purpose" a bunch lately as her big trump card. Any legal scholars want to theorize on what she has half understood and thinks she's Perry Mason now?
 

SFWA liaison

Heidi Hildeman customer
Forum Clout
113,346
how embarrassing is it for smelly jackie that she doxed Dushatar and Gibney with zero evidence and hurting any credibility she pretended to have... meanwhile some bald accountant with zero cyber experience doxed Mr Softie? lol outdone in her pretend-field by a capeshit fag obsessed with NAMBLA

even among Patposters the only one RTing her is 75% mentally challenged Jón Frímann

they eat their own!
 
Forum Clout
1,365
So, whenever these halftards (Hi Jackie, you look like you smell worse than a prison in Oman) think they've stumbled into some new loophole or definition of things that allows them to use the law to get their way, they say it ad nauseum. Jax is saying "single purpose" a bunch lately as her big trump card. Any legal scholars want to theorize on what she has half understood and thinks she's Perry Mason now?

Putting on my 1.7 hat here, I'm assuming Jackie believes Mr. Gibney would not be protected by 230 if the forum's sole reason for exisisting is to encourage commitment of illegal acts. That would qualify as intent by Mr Gibney and he would be as liable as the user's of the forum.
 
Top