• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Today’s Court Hearing - Link & Live Discussion

JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS

DMANIAC
Forum Clout
54,701
@notalawyer - haven’t watched it yet but it sounds like the judge pro tem was not fully up to speed on the actual case laws that would apply.

Is the Judge pro tem going to make a recommendation for the actual judge? If so, will the actual judge decide if he accepts or rejects it? Is it common for the judge to reject a judge pro tems recommendation?
 

TorqueWheeler

An enormous amount of muscle.
Forum Clout
78,635
There's no doubt in my mind that bow tie wearing faggot was just making it hard on Jerry due to some weird Asian rivalry. Reminded me of this Family Guy clip. "There's many different varieties that all hate each other for some reason."


it's very true. My wife hates all other non-Jap Asians. Zero camaraderie between them.
 

Jenna

be nice to Jenna
Forum Clout
67,105
@notalawyer

I get that the Josiah tapes maybe shouldn't be entered, but what about the Strictly Stalking podcast? The pests had nothing to do with Patrick deciding to appear on that podcast, and talk about how the lawsuit is being paid for by a "group he's a part of" who we have "pissed off".

Patrick voluntarily went on a podcast, and volunteered this information without any sort of deception from the "stlakers". Surely his own words point to an organization funding the lawsuit, common sense (or whatever you'd legally call that) dictates it's probably SFWA, which is why Jen wants to subpoena their finances related to Pat.
 

Gay Faggot.

Boqcels in DISTRESS!!!
Forum Clout
85,598
it's very true. My wife hates all other non-Jap Asians. Zero camaraderie between them.
Asians hate eachother for shit that happened hundreds to thousands of years ago. Japs hate Koreans because after the Japanese civil war ( samurai shit) they invaded Korea and lost. The chinks also aided them which pissed the japs off. The hate between China and Japan was refueled during WW2. You guys think blacks can’t let slavery go. Look up asian history. They’re mad about ancient shit.
 

TorqueWheeler

An enormous amount of muscle.
Forum Clout
78,635
Asians hate eachother for shit that happened hundreds to thousands of years ago. Japs hate Koreans because after the Japanese civil war ( samurai shit) they invaded Korea and lost. The chinks also aided them which pissed the japs off. The hate between China and Japan was refueled during WW2. You guys think blacks can’t let slavery go. Look up asian history. They’re mad about ancient shit.
Actually Japs hate Korean's because they destroyed them as a precursor to WWII and now Korean's won't shut the fuck up about it and and demand reparations from the Japanese government to this day. They consider Chinks to be subhuman which is funny cause they don't really look all that different.

To this day, if your grandparents were Korean you're considered a foreigner in Japan even if both of your parents and you were born there. They really can't accept it.
 

UnPRePared

For the last time, I am NOT Jeff Bridges!
Forum Clout
57,360
My world history is rusty, but China was an American Ally during WW2, right? Then when they went communist, it flipped to Japan?

I may not have had a 1.7 GPA equivalent in school but I really don't remember a lot of what I was taught. Girls and Guitars, 16, didn't know dick about American history.
 
G

guest

Guest
Could you please play devils advocate and speculate why he had such an entrenched cunty attitude? Why was he so certain he’s right?

He believed the whole right wing thing and took the opposing person's word that the Petitioner was "proven to has been harassing the SFWA". There was no evidence given , just speculation, but that's my take.

It was a long shot, but they happened to get the right judge. Unfortunately for them it happened to be just the practice judge, so we'll see how the real judge responds.
 

Jenna

be nice to Jenna
Forum Clout
67,105
Look, we're not fighting in the court of public opinion here. Simply prove:

1. Trolls left false 1-star reviews on In the Black before it came out.

2. The SFWA got upset about it, released several public statements about fighting this.


3. Patrick introduces the lawsuit. About a third/half of the John Does are specifically sued for false reviews.

4. Patrick goes on a podcast to tell his side of the story, says the lawsuit is being paid for by an organization he's a part of who the trolls have pissed off.

No Apostlegate, no Josiah, no texts with covidcumia or shit Patrick has said on twitter/reddit. Use what they have said publicly to establish a probable link that they have spent $5,000 trying to conceal.
 

Kim_Jong_Poon_

Единственная станция, которая действительно раскач
Forum Clout
52,063
He believed the whole right wing thing and took the opposing person's word that the Petitioner was "proven to has been harassing the SFWA". There was no evidence given , just speculation, but that's my take.

It was a long shot, but they happened to get the right judge. Unfortunately for them it happened to be just the practice judge, so we'll see how the real judge responds.
Thank God the Pro Tem is sticking up for the good guys

Screenshot_20220519-124815_Chrome.jpg
 

TorqueWheeler

An enormous amount of muscle.
Forum Clout
78,635
My world history is rusty, but China was an American Ally during WW2, right? Then when they went communist, it flipped to Japan?

I may not have had a 1.7 GPA equivalent in school but I really don't remember a lot of what I was taught. Girls and Guitars, 16, didn't know dick about American history.
Not sure about the chinks to be honest. When WWII ended America camped out in Japan, wrote them a new constitution, banned all the marijuana (ironically you'll do years in prison for possession now and the TV there equates it to using heroin while we are getting ever closer to totally legalizing it) and pretty much decided everything for them. Japan has been a non-combative ally ever since. Still a ton of US troops in several bases in Japan who frequently rape the locals and get away with it.
 
G

guest

Guest
Look, we're not fighting in the court of public opinion here. Simply prove:

1. Trolls left false 1-star reviews on In the Black before it came out.

2. The SFWA got upset about it, released several public statements about fighting this.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://archive.ph/iBLjM[/URL]

3. Patrick introduces the lawsuit. About a third/half of the John Does are specifically sued for false reviews.

4. Patrick goes on a podcast to tell his side of the story, says the lawsuit is being paid for by an organization he's a part of who the trolls have pissed off.

No Apostlegate, no Josiah, no texts with covidcumia or shit Patrick has said on twitter/reddit. Use what they have said publicly to establish a probable link that they have spent $5,000 trying to conceal.

To the pro tem this doesn't matter. This is again, circumstantial. He wouldn't allow their own website's rules on member application. The point is this is unfalsifiable. He set up an impossible standard to overcome. He wants them to prove they have specific documents. The only people who can prove that are the people who quashed the subpoena, so that won't even happen.
 

Gay Faggot.

Boqcels in DISTRESS!!!
Forum Clout
85,598
Actually Japs hate Korean's because they destroyed them as a precursor to WWII and now Korean's won't shut the fuck up about it and and demand reparations from the Japanese government to this day. They consider Chinks to be subhuman which is funny cause they don't really look all that different.

To this day, if your grandparents were Korean you're considered a foreigner in Japan even if both of your parents and you were born there. They really can't accept it.
Yeah see, I forgot about that. My point is the shit has been going on for years. Basically all Asian history is them hating eachother for hundreds of years. With very few relative eras of “peace”. There was always some war going on, either civil or foreign over something. The only “tolerance” amongst Asians you see is in American generations. After the Fukushima reactor shit the Japanese were allowed to kill Chinese scrappers on site. Korea and Japan just opened up trading not that long ago. It’s fucking wild compared to the rest of the world.
 

TorqueWheeler

An enormous amount of muscle.
Forum Clout
78,635
Yeah see, I forgot about that. My point is the shit has been going on for years. Basically all Asian history is them hating eachother for hundreds of years. With very few relative eras of “peace”. There was always some war going on, either civil or foreign over something. The only “tolerance” amongst Asians you see is in American generations. After the Fukushima reactor shit the Japanese were allowed to kill Chinese scrappers on site. Korea and Japan just opened up trading not that long ago. It’s fucking wild compared to the rest of the world.
It's funny you mention that. I remember watching something on YouTube where the hardcore nationalist guys were basically confessing to going into Fukushima and murdering Chinks and obviously nothing was done about it. It really is a bizarre place that just doesn't make any kind of sense unless you spend a lot of time there and just learn to accept it.
 

TorquieTwoBeers

Forum Clout
30,767
Could you please play devils advocate and speculate why he had such an entrenched cunty attitude? Why was he so certain he’s right?
I mean, look at him. He got dressed up in his best sweater and bowtie but is so far up his own ass that he didn't bother to hang a fucking curtain behind him or use a zoom background so we have to see his pathetic studio/dorm apartment in the background. He probably has to walk down the hall to shower and shit.

I'm sure part of his job is to anticipate any objections by an actual judge and vigorously attempt to poke holes in the case, but he's also supposed to accept reasonable arguments. He's a pathetic training wheels judge that shares a communal kitchenette with strangers. It's overcompensation.

By the way, I base this opinion solely on the one still image of him in this thread, so I could be wrong because I didn't watch the hearing.
 

Jenna

be nice to Jenna
Forum Clout
67,105
To the pro tem this doesn't matter. This is again, circumstantial. He wouldn't allow their own website's rules on member application. The point is this is unfalsifiable. He set up an impossible standard to overcome. He wants them to prove they have specific documents. The only people who can prove that are the people who quashed the subpoena, so that won't even happen.

Again 16 don't know dick, but it seems to be the biggest issue is the failure to connect Patrick to the SFWA, which I haven't really seen Jerry make except loosely. Someone made an analogy that it was like suing Disney+ to get his subscriber information, you're not going to get Disney to hand it over without establishing why it's relevant.

Jerry hasn't put "we think SFWA might have funded Patrick's lawsuit" into legal writing, and the superlawyer is doing a good job playing dumb, shrugging his shoulders, and giving the ol' I dunno what we have to do with all this! You can't be a Stavros in court and argue the other party needs to hand over information because you want it. You have to establish the why.
 

Hardcore Jewish Nihilism

Ask me about my cock size
Forum Clout
10,333
He believed the whole right wing thing and took the opposing person's word that the Petitioner was "proven to has been harassing the SFWA". There was no evidence given , just speculation, but that's my take.

It was a long shot, but they happened to get the right judge. Unfortunately for them it happened to be just the practice judge, so we'll see how the real judge responds.
Now my understand of the law is rusty but let's say that the REAL Judge upholds the SFWA quash...does Patrick still have to pay Quasi, either way?
 
Top