G
guest
Guest
This judge was dead-set on rejecting everything for some reason, either because he didn't read Jen's brief and wanted to save face or strongly disliked the SFWA allegedly facing harassment.That’s what I mean, why can’t he simply say “there is important financial information regarding judgment debtor and the SFWA which is important in my capacity to collect judgment for my client”
Or is that basically what he did say in legalese and the SFWA lucked out and got an ignorant retard judge to review it initially?
Jen was also being a boyscout and limited himself to the facts, which is the correct thing to do but probably not a winner here. If he was willing to go down in the mud, he should have spent 3 minutes of his time doing a jeremiad about the SFWA members being self-described rabble-rousers who attack people online for political and other reasons, including his client.
IMO it would have helped if an entertainment industry outlet like Bounding Into Comics wrote an article about SFWA funding Patrick and this got added as an exhibit.