- Forum Clout
- 24,725
-
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
- Forum Clout
- 41,325
FAWWWWK! I didn't realise what I just said!
- Forum Clout
- 31,699
A pro gay bow tie wearing judge from SF presiding a case involving actual perverts? I demand a retrial in neutral Arkansas!
- Forum Clout
- 20,297
So is the SFWA denying that they helped pay for the lolsuit? So either Patrick or they are lying. Can't the court just ask Patrick or the SFWA under penalty of perjury what the truth and nothing but the truth is? If they helped him they're on the hook for debt fees. If not, then it's all on Fatty. Seems cut n dry. Why's this judge being such a cocksucker about it?
G
guest
Guest
Jerry did very well. This judge was just searching post hoc for reasons to quash this. It was extremely obvious. Jerry countered him several times. When the judge said it was hearsay to refer to the website, Jerry pointed out it was one of the numerous hearsay exceptions. Then the pro tem shifted the goalposts. Well its not hearsay, but you don't have conclusive evidence. The subtle move here was that the burden was shifted to Jen's side. All Jen had to do was show prima facie to avoid the sanctions. Just like Tomlinson had to show for quasi to defeat the sanctions. Except their own website showing it as a requirement is the prima facie. There were about 5 or 6 of these examples of the pro tem not having an answer and then moving the goalposts.
G
guest
Guest
See my post ^. He obviously has an agenda.
G
guest
Guest
Where the fuck is the recording? fuck!
- Forum Clout
- 55,023
G
guest
Guest
Liberal faggot
G
guest
Guest
As another example, he was pulling shit out of his ass, which Jen called him on. The pro tem was saying that the SFWA isn't a financial institution , Tomlinson is just a member. But there's no case law. He doesn't cite any justification. The type of third party doesn't make a difference.
- Forum Clout
- 211,533
Leave food out of this.
- Forum Clout
- 20,297
Would it be a legitimate move to subpoena Brinton to find out if he was paid for his work by Patrick or the SFWA directly or does fall under client/lawyer confidentiality? I can't see the SFWA transferring that much $$$ to Fatso then trusting him to pay Brinton. I imagine they did it themselves.
- Forum Clout
- 283,571
The upside is Pat is still on the hook for over $30k
- Forum Clout
- 78,636
He sounded Chinese as fuck in the end.
- Forum Clout
- 67,867
Fawk, Pat is gonna be oinking big time today.
- Forum Clout
- 129,542
I refer to my earlier post, it doesn’t matter if you’re following the law and can argue it cohesively, like JJ did. You’re always at the mercy of a judge and how they’re feeling that day. We got a snippy agenda driven Asian rent boy who didn’t want to be proven wrong so that’s it.
- Forum Clout
- 102,925
Time to abandon the pro tem process. Twice now these interim judges have gotten things wrong: Stein about the sanctions, this guy with prima facie evidence.
Last edited:
- Forum Clout
- 23,422
Exactly what I was thinking. Thanks for making me feel less crazy.