• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

reason 1/1,000,000 why Niki Robinson is a piece of shit

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
78,353
On Febuary 7, 2024 My Wisconsin Attorney spoke to Niki Robinson in an effort to close out the Santa Clara debt. She was informed it would be roughly around 30k. She said she would pay 11k and asked why it was 30k. She was informed about the additional costs, fees and interest.

On Febuary 9, 2024 My Wisconsin Attorney left a voicemail for Niki to resolve the outstanding debt again. She never returned this voicemail or spoke with Dave again.


The check that I previous posted was dated February 8th, which was one day after my attorney informed Niki that the amount was more than 11k. Also included was this letter:







Why is this significant? Well Nicole had just been informed that she owed more than 11k. Yet she wrote a letter specifically stating that the check represents the "full satisfaction of the judgement"

... there's some contention about the law here. It might be the case that if you cash a check for less than the judgement you have "agreed" to the full amount. Even writing "under protest" or something on the check may not be enough. So I had a check for 11k, that I couldn't cash until I had the remaining amount. Given the specific timing of when this occurred, its likely Niki consulted a lawyer and they tried a legal trick in order to steal 26 thousand dollars from me. that's right, after filing a frivolous lawsuit, costing me 83k and 3 years of my life. She tried one last gambit to steal from me.



Nice gamesmanship, idiot.
 

PorqueDealer

Portly Pepperoni Purveyor
Forum Clout
38,744
Which is more insulting? The fact that they tried to steal $26k or that with their 140IQ (combined) they thought you would fall for it?

Just noticed they thought they would be clever by dating the letter the 6th. "oh we sent that before you told us of the updated balance!". The bank drafted check is on the 8th.
 
Last edited:

TorquieTwoBeers

Forum Clout
27,609
On Febuary 7, 2024 My Wisconsin Attorney spoke to Niki Robinson in an effort to close out the Santa Clara debt. She was informed it would be roughly around 30k. She said she would pay 11k and asked why it was 30k. She was informed about the additional costs, fees and interest.

On Febuary 9, 2024 My Wisconsin Attorney left a voicemail for Niki to resolve the outstanding debt again. She never returned this voicemail or spoke with Dave again.


The check that I previous posted was dated February 8th, which was one day after my attorney informed Niki that the amount was more than 11k. Also included was this letter:







Why is this significant? Well Nicole had just been informed that she owed more than 11k. Yet she wrote a letter specifically stating that the check represents the "full satisfaction of the judgement"

... there's some contention about the law here. It might be the case that if you cash a check for less than the judgement you have "agreed" to the full amount. Even writing "under protest" or something on the check may not be enough. So I had a check for 11k, that I couldn't cash until I had the remaining amount. Given the specific timing of when this occurred, its likely Niki consulted a lawyer and they tried a legal trick in order to steal 26 thousand dollars from me. that's right, after filing a frivolous lawsuit, costing me 83k and 3 years of my life. She tried one last gambit to steal from me.



Nice gamesmanship, idiot.
I would say to apply Hanlon's Razor here, but you had to deal with them for three years, so you're probably right that this was malicious. But a part of me still thinks it's Michael Scott "I Declare Bankruptcy"-level stupidity.
 

Imager

Scaffolding Photographer
Forum Clout
59,763
I think it’s interesting that they both signed the letter. There was really no reason for them to sign it unless they were planning on using a copy for evidence.

Why on earth would they want to drag this out? Did they ever eke out a win of any sort, at all?

Also Patrick signing the letter, in my interpretation, means he did pay his stlakers, even though we have recorded evidence of him saying he would never do such a thing.

Patrick Tomlinson may not be a man of his word, but he sure is fat.
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
78,353
I would say to apply Hanlon's Razor here, but you had to deal with them for three years, so you're probably right that this was malicious. But a part of me still thinks it's Michael Scott "I Declare Bankruptcy"-level stupidity.

I mean I usually do. But like occams these are a priori heuristics. Meaning you use them as a heuristic to guide the hypothesis. Or as a determining factor when you're looking at theoretic virtues for underdetermined hypotheses.

In non faggot speak there's evidence that increases the probability of one hypothesis over another here. The timing of the letter and the specific wording raise the probability to me that this was done on purpose.
 
Top