- Forum Clout
- 38,880
Because he wasnt paying for it16, dick, etc. Would Rick have been able to retract his suit at this point in time? Why do you think he didn’t if so?
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Because he wasnt paying for it16, dick, etc. Would Rick have been able to retract his suit at this point in time? Why do you think he didn’t if so?
I mean he literally said as much to josiah
[URL unfurl="true"]https://apostlegate.net/tape-4/[/URL]
It was literally Rahul Kumar.I wonder who he thought he had.
That's not how his fat retard brain works. I still don't really understand it , but i have some idea after 3 years at least. You have to start from his delusions (child) and proceed as though everything he believed at the time was 100% true.Again because he is always in the right he thinks he has this insane leverage.
Jon stole my wife and knows he was in the wrong, so I can ask him for anything I want, and (for some reason) his sense of knowing he’s in the wrong will just give me everything.
Quasi is running a site that harasses me and knows he was in the wrong, so I can ask him for anything I want, and (for some reason) his sense of knowing he’s in the wrong will just give me everything.
It’s like he cannot understand the divorce between morality and law. Like Quasi could feel whatever guilt he wants but he’s legally in the right. Jon can feel whatever guilt he wants but he’s legally in the right. Why the fuck would someone throw away an easy win just out of feeling bad? Well I guess this is the same dude who gave away all of his parental rights because he felt bad.
Yes he could have withdrawn it. Rewrote it to remove me and then filed again. The wisconsin darkie judge said that to brinton. As Uncle J stated it wasn't his money. But he also didn't want to remove me under any circumstances. I'm also assuming that the SFWA wasn't going to fund a round two after 100k already.16, dick, etc. Would Rick have been able to retract his suit at this point in time? Why do you think he didn’t if so?
In his mind all of his enemies are extremely low class with very little money. It was unthinkable to him that anyone would be able to defend against the might of a $100,000 SFWA funded lawsuit. Even when confronted with people he despises doing well in their lives he always has a cope ‘his father gave him the money’ ‘he stole it’ ‘his ancestors owned slaves’ ‘his father is a federal judge’.how his fat retard brain works
Be honest, you would have.Quasi will throw everyone under the bus as the first sign of trouble.
I mean sure , but that's why i set it up so that i couldn't even if i wanted to.Be honest, you would have.
He said he’ll turn over whatever info he has to le from day 1Be honest, you would have.
I FUCKING HATE PAJEETS!He said he’ll turn over whatever info he has to le from day 1
Pat's micromanagement of Brinton probably lost him the $84K (lost the SFWA over $200K). If he just let Brinton work then things probably would've gone much different.Pat openly stated it was hard to let his lawyers handle the case instead of him stepping in to take charge. That probably would've been quicker and cost him a lot less for the same outcome (less public humiliation though).
I don't believe him. He wants to re-write history and distance himself from the massive failure, throw his lawyers under the bus for it.Pat openly stated it was hard to let his lawyers handle the case instead of him stepping in to take charge. That probably would've been quicker and cost him a lot less for the same outcome (less public humiliation though).
It was back when he was feeling confident, so his 1.2 brain was looking at people just filing his assortment of accusations, assuming they were going to win, and thinking "I could do that!"I don't believe him. He wants to re-write history and distance himself from the massive failure, throw his lawyers under the bus for it.
We know from "I didn't know I could appeal" bullshit.
This is the result of Pats theory of " Drag the trolls into the light" and it ended up costing them over $100k.Like I said in the other thread he thought you would cave. It’s so fucking retarded. They thought you would cave when the suit was brought and they didn’t. They thought it ridiculous you would spend 20k defending yourself. So why the fuck after not caving for any of that would you just go “Yeah this is a headache i cant do this anymore” especially when you were going to be awarded the fees (as far as I understand, although I know that old jew did say no fees would be awarded…pudding head.)
The more I read about the suit the more i’m shocked realizing everyone involved on Pats side dumped 100k NOT to sue you or the forum, or even get it shut down. It was simply to unmask you. And what then? I can guarantee he wouldn’t sue you personally if he found that shit out. He would do what he claims he always wanted to do from the beginning: “Unmask” the invidiuals and shame them publicly to get them fired or etc etc. Which is somehow even stupider than just trying to get the site shut down.
And again I keep bringing it up because its just so fawwkin funny…he found out your “identity” like 8 months ago. He put it in his court documents claiming he was going to sue Gibney so this entire debt and original litigation served it’s purpose now that he “knows who you are”. And nothing came of it except for a few flaccid tweets, but even then I feel like we haven’t heard a lot about Gibney for the past few months from him.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/