-
Mr. Tomlinson has just threatened Leslie Varney, a female publisher whom he has been attacking on Twitter from behind a block for more than a year, to be sued into poverty with a lawsuit that will presumably be funded by the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America.
- Mr. Tomlinson's 2021 lawsuit was funded in secret by the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, a 501(c)(3) charity, to the tune of $100,000 without the knowledge or consent of their donors or members. They also agreed to pay any sanctions in case he lost (which he did).
- All parties involved signed NDAs so that the general public would never know.
- To this day, SFWA has never acknowledged its funding of the lawsuit, and actively instructs the few people in the know to ignore all inquiries into it.
- Is the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America funding Mr. Tomlinson's lawsuit against the Milwaukee Police? If they are, the general public probably wouldn't know due to their history of funding expensive lawsuits in secret.
- You can use IRS form 3949-A to report SFWA's activity if you reasonably believe that it is illegal for a 501(c)(3) charity to secretly fund frivolous nuisance lawsuits for one of its members.
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal (himself) to a troll.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never shown this video footage during any of his media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergences (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
reason 1/1,000,000 why Brinton J. Resto no longer works for Minc Law
- Thread starter quasi101
- Start date
Not good.
He never paid you a penny, stlaker. Enjoy prison.
G
guest
Guest
Stupid Pat is suing the city he lives in and the police department that did its job. If he has any potential suit, it's against Brinton and Minc law. But that would mean admitting he's a dummy who didn't do his homework so they're safe.
Betsy is a fat slob coal burning whore who Brinton Resto can't sexually satisfy even though he probably tries when he hands over her monthly rent check.
this agreement blew up any hope of an agreement for months because they wouldn't back off from it. First of all why the fuck would I agree to releasing an "attorney" from any future litigation lmao. Every lawyer I asked said they had never heard of that before.
The other issue , which I had my attorney explain to resto , was that this was just a roundabout way to get my dox eventually. My question was, if I'm anonymous, how can they confirm that a lawsuit would be brought by me first before being able to view my information in whatever retarded haphazard way he outlined in his kindergarten level screed. Basically, if Brinton is the one that wants me to release any claims from and he's the one viewing my identity, then literally any lawsuit brought again Pat in the future would then dox me. Why the fuck would i sign this when he has no leverage.
Really explains Jon’s posts that time when he briefly described how unreasonable he was with the custody stuff and how exasperated they were dealing with him.
that clause about protecting his attorneys seems particularly weird
Did el Tigre trash him at all? The brother seems ruthless and I want to know more about him
I'm guessing it was a last ditch effort to protect himself because he used illegally obtained evidence in the quash response. He knew I had a valid claim against him.
Like I said in the other thread he thought you would cave. It’s so fucking retarded. They thought you would cave when the suit was brought and they didn’t. They thought it ridiculous you would spend 20k defending yourself. So why the fuck after not caving for any of that would you just go “Yeah this is a headache i cant do this anymore” especially when you were going to be awarded the fees (as far as I understand, although I know that old jew did say no fees would be awarded…pudding head.)
The more I read about the suit the more i’m shocked realizing everyone involved on Pats side dumped 100k NOT to sue you or the forum, or even get it shut down. It was simply to unmask you. And what then? I can guarantee he wouldn’t sue you personally if he found that shit out. He would do what he claims he always wanted to do from the beginning: “Unmask” the invidiuals and shame them publicly to get them fired or etc etc. Which is somehow even stupider than just trying to get the site shut down.
And again I keep bringing it up because its just so fawwkin funny…he found out your “identity” like 8 months ago. He put it in his court documents claiming he was going to sue Gibney so this entire debt and original litigation served it’s purpose now that he “knows who you are”. And nothing came of it except for a few flaccid tweets, but even then I feel like we haven’t heard a lot about Gibney for the past few months from him.
Failing that he would have stabbed you in the neck arteries with a broken wine bottle.
Why would anyone agree to that stuff when you could just ignore them and make the court enforce the judgment regardless lol
G
guest
Guest
Yeah I didn't read it. Anyone could see that Brinton was a mong though. Enjoy your payback money and let the guy whose name rhymes with Cumia run the site now.
Imagine 1.2 GPA who failed problem solving class trying to navigate through a negotiation.
"B-b-b-but this is not how it goes when I play a tough guy on DnD and my liTTle brother tard-wrangles me and lets me win!"
"B-b-b-but this is not how it goes when I play a tough guy on DnD and my liTTle brother tard-wrangles me and lets me win!"
Pat wanted you to jerk each other off to completion? Wow.
Again because he is always in the right he thinks he has this insane leverage.
Jon stole my wife and knows he was in the wrong, so I can ask him for anything I want, and (for some reason) his sense of knowing he’s in the wrong will just give me everything.
Quasi is running a site that harasses me and knows he was in the wrong, so I can ask him for anything I want, and (for some reason) his sense of knowing he’s in the wrong will just give me everything.
It’s like he cannot understand the divorce between morality and law. Like Quasi could feel whatever guilt he wants but he’s legally in the right. Jon can feel whatever guilt he wants but he’s legally in the right. Why the fuck would someone throw away an easy win just out of feeling bad? Well I guess this is the same dude who gave away all of his parental rights because he felt bad.
16, dick, etc. Would Rick have been able to retract his suit at this point in time? Why do you think he didn’t if so?
So Pig wants us to believe that he is capable of suggesting, making and/or signing a settlement agreement (containing niche legal terms such as pending discovery actions, forum, venue and anonymity protections) however he did not know that he could appeal the courts ruling like he told Javier? Nice idiosyncratic understanding of civil litigation, stupid.
Last edited: