"Pretend", a true crime podcast, did a triple feature on Pat published earlier this week. Includes interviews with Pat, Nikki and Hildy!

[guest]

The mental gymnastics these clowns had to go through in order to shoehorn "white privilege" into this is embarrassing. They just can't stop framing other people for their own actions:

"It's not my abrasive and annoying personality that makes people hate me. It's the subreddit!"

"I didn't vandalize my own property. It's cyberstlakers!"

"I'm not a baby rage faggot throwing a temper tantrum. It's white people's fault!"

Why can't he behave??!!

 

[FatPatsBaps]

The mental gymnastics these clowns had to go through in order to shoehorn "white privilege" into this is embarrassing.

And they did it so badly, Niki in particular.

If I was Niki I would've added that, by using our white privilege, we are standing up for all victims of SWATting, especially those who are African-American. Instead she made it all about herself and Pat.

Anyway, I get the impression that Javier wants nothing more to do with this story, hence why there won't be a part 5. I think Pat and Niki have proved they're unlikeable and untrustworthy. Javier doesn't want to continue the story because, inevitably, he'll probably reluctantly side with the pests, if hasn't done so already, which isn't a good look for his podcast.

 

[Stent]

Any kind of push-back on their story and they really start becoming unhinged. I'm glad it's not me owed $50k+ by these two retards.

THEY'RE TRYING TO KILL US!

Are they?

Javier doesn't want to continue the story because, inevitably, he'll probably reluctantly side with the pests, if hasn't done so already, which isn't a good look for his podcast.

That's what I didn't get about the episode. The host has this crazy story with an obviously unclear future and he's just dropping it. What a faggot. This could be his golden ticket to podcast fame (upwards of 20 listeners and a recurring Deep Discount ad) and he's going to quit.

 

[guest]

That's what I didn't get about the episode. The host has this crazy story with an obviously unclear future and he's just dropping it. What a faggot. This could be his golden ticket to podcast fame (upwards of 20 listeners and a recurring Deep Discount ad) and he's going to quit.

I think quitting it now was the best opinion in this retarded case.
Sometimes I wish I didnt click on that O&A Youtube clip backmintheday I was browsing 4chan, to avoid this retarded rabbithole.

 

[FranksWirecutters]

This new one is interesting That's all really.

He had Dan Mullens name the whole time but didn't want to frame an innocent person. #canyonfacts?

Are we getting the unedited Josiah 5? I don't remember parts of that clip.

 

[guest]

Just listened to part 4. Take-aways -

"Quasi" is a smart guy. His answers were either written by his lawyer or he ran them by them.

It was admin, not Quaso.

Both those guys are pretty smart, unless they are drunk on Kingfisher and cashew feni (which happened/happens quite a lot tho)

 

[HotDogJoe]

"Javier, child - You did noT LisTen! These are noT trolls as I have already explained to you! They are liTerally trying to kill us!"

Honestly I'm amazed they actually agreed to do a follow up interview to rebut the rascals. Normally when pig has his narrative questioned in any way, he'll dismiss the person as a nazi cyberstalking terrorist.

 

[guest]

It was admin, not Quaso.

Both those guys are pretty smart, unless they are drunk on Kingfisher and cashew feni (which happened/happens quite a lot tho)

Of course! My mistake!

WWAW Bombay Mix? It crunches pretty good

 

[dee dee ramone]

Part 4 was pfg if you ask me.

I like how Javiar ended by saying he lost IQ points. Called back to the judge at the Nadolski trial saying it was the stupidest case he had ever heard.

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

Quasi didn’t counter sue him, btw. Rick owes Quasi because his subpoena was quashed and the law specifies that he has to pay the legal fees of the other party. Quasi dindu nuffin.

I’m pretty sure in the judgement it clearly states the period it can be appealed. And who doesent know you can appeal a lawsuit? Patrick really is a fucking retard. The reality is Pat was out of money and couldn’t pay his attorney Milton from Office Space to file an appeal. It’s really that simple.

 

[guest]

The mental gymnastics these clowns had to go through in order to shoehorn "white privilege" into this is embarrassing. They just can't stop framing other people for their own actions:

"It's not my abrasive and annoying personality that makes people hate me. It's the subreddit!"

"I didn't vandalize my own property. It's cyberstlakers!"

"I'm not a baby rage faggot throwing a temper tantrum. It's white people's fault!"

Why can't he behave??!!

They go from "white privilege" to "white saviour complex" in under a minute. Basically who else can save "people of colour" from the police death squads roaming America, aside from noble whites like Rick and Nik? That's their take.That's obviously what him spazzing out and screaming at armed officers was about. Not a petulant narcissist losing his cool. No. It's activism, child.

I like how Javier gave Dan the last word, and that word was basically "the more you look into Patrick, the more hateable he becomes." Javier is a brotherman in all but name.

 

[TorqueWheeler]

Tbh I'd think the same thing.

The problem with that, child is that would require the SFWA to admit they funded a lawsuit with money provided by their members while operating under the guise of an org that can't do that. Which is exactly why they hired a Harvard law grad to make sure those details were never made public.

 

[King of OnAForums]

Ha. Imagine your lawyer not telling you that you could be liable for the opposing party's legal fees if you lose. Imagine going after a successful computer nerd who's a savvy saver with a monumental budget of $120K+ of other people's money and not knowing the risks.

If Pat put that $120K towards a pipe-hitting smallhat with an excellent track record instead of a 30-year-old Puerto Rican twink, things would be so different right now.

 

[bantadant]

Javier: "Do you think Patrick is a pedophile or associates with pedophiles?"
Dan: "No, i don't"

Nigga, what? He even talks about Hildy being interviewed and still says "no." Can Dan be invited back to the forum just so he can be banned again?



Also, when the fuck did we get these? They fucking rule

 

[RobertMewler]

Javier: "Do you think Patrick is a pedophile or associates with pedophiles?"
Dan: "No, i don't"

Nigga, what? He even talks about Hildy being interviewed and still says "no." Can Dan be invited back to the forum just so he can be banned again?



Also, when the fuck did we get these? They fucking rule

I guess Dan didn't see the hundreds of mentions of Hildy defending "virtuous pedophiles". Dude needs to linger longer.

 

[guest]

Javier: "Do you think Patrick is a pedophile or associates with pedophiles?"
Dan: "No, i don't"

Nigga, what? He even talks about Hildy being interviewed and still says "no." Can Dan be invited back to the forum just so he can be banned again?

Probably wanted to avoid a potential defamation tort.

 

[Imager]

I guess Dan didn't see the hundreds of mentions of Hildy defending "virtuous pedophiles". Dude needs to linger longer.

Hey Dan, "linger longer" is a phrase that was used often on the Opie and Anthony radio show, which was a very popular show in the 90s.

EDIT: Just wanted to add that in the 90s, hosts Opie and Anthony were in their mid 20s.

 

[bantadant]

Lol @ Pat saying "I probably drink more than I should" at the end [44:25]

 

[Imager]

I want to just appreciate how lucky we are that this episode got made. Wall post coming but please hang with me.

Due to the premise of Javier's podcast, he doesn't have to bother much to get the other side of the story, because it's usually pretty clear what's happening.

In this case, he spent a few hours with Fati and Niki and believed what they said.

He was then contacted by admin/quasi/kumar and was challenged as a 'journalist'. This was a brilliant move. It was this, more than anything else, that made part 4 of this podcast possible.

You can hear Javier's questions at the beginning of the episode being very pro Patrick. Then he has Dan on and challenges Dan but Dan comes off as so much more intelligent than Patrick. Just from Quasi and Dan you can hear a huge difference in the approach the answers and the path to truth is shown.

And this led to Javier listening to the entirety of Josiah 5.

Javier could have made a shitload of money streaming a live react to Josiah 5. I'm sure Javier had some doubts going in, but Josiah 5 sealed that he had been duped by Patrick, and he then has to say "We're all dumber for having listened to this and I won't even give you the courtesy of an update on what happens to Patrick in a future podcast because I just want to wash my hands of this. You can check my Twitter if you give a shit."

It's like Patrick is the real life version of the Holocaust narrative. Everyone believes him at first, but the slightest actual contradictory facts come out and he overreacts and just says "My side of the story is the only side of the story."

Javier realized in Part 4 that he wasted the past month of his life putting this shit together, and came to that realization after probably 20 minutes with Dan Mullen. You can't fucking write comedy like that.

 

[Mitch Weaver]

Probably wanted to avoid a potential defamation tort.

Yeah Dan has made many a retarded moves but I can’t blame him on this. I would’ve thrown that cocksucker Hildy under the bus tho. Mutant faggit thinks people that deface online obituaries are worse than pedos, no exceptions!

But then again I don’t have 5 sinks to protect.