- Forum Clout
- 14,222
Ew. You are such a perv. You make those streetshitters look civilized.Which part? There's a scene early on, before her head is shaved, where she's leaning over and talking to a friend. And... damn! That figure!
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Ew. You are such a perv. You make those streetshitters look civilized.Which part? There's a scene early on, before her head is shaved, where she's leaning over and talking to a friend. And... damn! That figure!
I love how you went and watched a two hour movie to come up with online rebuttals. You really need to “win”Maybe not defending, but ignoring in favor of the wrong thing, yeah.
Which part? There's a scene early on, before her head is shaved, where she's leaning over and talking to a friend. And... damn! That figure!
Hey Hildy. When's the last time you said something negative about Muslims or Jews? You atheist leftist faggots love picking on Christians because they turn the other cheek and are classier than you miserable dorks.Yes, you do. If you want to label yourselves "anti-pedo" with any degree of credibility, that is.
Ignoring the biggest and most heavily funded shelter of pedophilia, the Catholic priesthood (and you do), is not only not seeing the forest for the trees, it's obsessing over one twig. Actually, it's obsessing over an imagined twig, because all you have on SFWA is two corpses, one jailbird, and one elderly writer who was abused as a kid but who never abused one himself. And for that, you're going to condemn a sci fi community of millions? Over a disqualified sample size of FOUR? Come on.
I know we like to kid around here (no pun intended! ) but this is such a retarded argument. Everyone is aware priests are pedos so it's pointless to mention it. You also seem to be trying really hard to deflect attention from yourself and the SFWA. Very suspicious.Yes, you do. If you want to label yourselves "anti-pedo" with any degree of credibility, that is.
Ignoring the biggest and most heavily funded shelter of pedophilia, the Catholic priesthood (and you do), is not only not seeing the forest for the trees, it's obsessing over one twig. Actually, it's obsessing over an imagined twig, because all you have on SFWA is two corpses, one jailbird, and one elderly writer who was abused as a kid but who never abused one himself. And for that, you're going to condemn a sci fi community of millions? Over a disqualified sample size of FOUR? Come on.
Hey, you hear that it's part of the orthodox judaism bris ritual to suck the baby's penis to this day? Or that muslims in most countries are allowed to go as young as 9 ()? I know you're a neckbearded faggot that purports to desssssspisssse all religion equally, but you sure devote your attention to a narrow group of people and ignore people in your own circle, ie terminally online fedora tippers who seem to write fantastical media fit for adults... and children... alike.I had to re-watch V for Vendetta in order to know what the hell you were talking about. I'd completely forgotten the scene where Portman dresses as a Lolita to entrap a pedophile priest.
So, three things:
1) This whole thing started when I Tweeted that y'all ignore real pedophilia in the priesthood in favor of imagined pedophilia in SFWA. You don't give a DAMN about pedos if you aren't regularly attacking the Catholic church, and that's a fact!
2) Certainly not my favorite scene if I'd forgotten it.
3) My actual favorite part about the scene is where Bishop Lilliman, the pedo priest in question, dies by getting fed a cyanide-laced communion wafer by V, who was let into the Bishop's home by Evey.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Hey hildy, you see that huffpost article where they surveyed imprisoned pedophiles and came to the conclusion that not all star trek fans are pedophiles but all pedophiles are star trek fans? Makes me laugh every time.Yes, you do. If you want to label yourselves "anti-pedo" with any degree of credibility, that is.
Ignoring the biggest and most heavily funded shelter of pedophilia, the Catholic priesthood (and you do), is not only not seeing the forest for the trees, it's obsessing over one twig. Actually, it's obsessing over an imagined twig, because all you have on SFWA is two corpses, one jailbird, and one elderly writer who was abused as a kid but who never abused one himself. And for that, you're going to condemn a sci fi community of millions? Over a disqualified sample size of FOUR? Come on.
I think he's questioning our anti-pedo bona fides which is pretty rich coming from a pedophile enablerDid this faggot really just call us 'anti-pedos'?
Uhhh, yea, you got us.
If nothing else we are angry and autistic.Remember in the other thread when you called me a "moron" for saying that V for Vendetta came out in 2006, even though it's accurate? You were so sure that it came out in 2005 that you insulted me for thinking otherwise, even though you were wrong.
Think about that concept every time you pointlessly argue something here. For example, your insistence that you are not defending pedophiles in any way. Or, as another example, whether or not your wife is a hideous abomination. Shinkle bout it.
How do you even remember to breath, you fucking mongoloid?I had to re-watch V for Vendetta in order to know what the hell you were talking about. I'd completely forgotten the scene where Portman dresses as a Lolita to entrap a pedophile priest.
So, three things:
1) This whole thing started when I Tweeted that y'all ignore real pedophilia in the priesthood in favor of imagined pedophilia in SFWA. You don't give a DAMN about pedos if you aren't regularly attacking the Catholic church, and that's a fact!
2) Certainly not my favorite scene if I'd forgotten it.
3) My actual favorite part about the scene is where Bishop Lilliman, the pedo priest in question, dies by getting fed a cyanide-laced communion wafer by V, who was let into the Bishop's home by Evey.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
I suspect your pedo defence bit is you trying to “troll the scoundtrolls” and you’re screen shotting this and posting it in some discord or what have you for your fat repulsive friends. Whether you’re actually a creep or your defending them is not simplyMaybe not defending, but ignoring in favor of the wrong thing, yeah.
Which part? There's a scene early on, before her head is shaved, where she's leaning over and talking to a friend. And... damn! That figure!
5. Danny Ross aka @BenDovid covered up for a pedophile until said pedophile broke up the friendship with him.
Two wrongs don't make a right you Homer Simpson level IQ kid diddling retardYes, you do. If you want to label yourselves "anti-pedo" with any degree of credibility, that is.
Ignoring the biggest and most heavily funded shelter of pedophilia, the Catholic priesthood (and you do), is not only not seeing the forest for the trees, it's obsessing over one twig. Actually, it's obsessing over an imagined twig, because all you have on SFWA is two corpses, one jailbird, and one elderly writer who was abused as a kid but who never abused one himself. And for that, you're going to condemn a sci fi community of millions? Over a disqualified sample size of FOUR? Come on.
Cool, now there are 2 balding pedo-enabling manlet faggots in this thread employing kiked-out argument tactics to avoid responsibility for their advocacy and likely culpability of raping children.And Jim. And Travis. And Sam. And Opie. And Keith. And Erik. Hell, Erik still works for the guy. He's totally down with fingering kids. Hmm. I guess his siblings. They know. Man, lotsa people know about this and never said anything...weird.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/