- Forum Clout
- 42,342
Your answer is that making fun of Catholics doesn't count if someone in the joke isn't a CatholicIS Weimer a priest? Because if not, doesn't count.
Goal post moving scientologist
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Your answer is that making fun of Catholics doesn't count if someone in the joke isn't a CatholicIS Weimer a priest? Because if not, doesn't count.
Bwahahahahahaaaa!I forgot how this was a forum of Jesuits; I don’t think many folks here have much love for the Church outside of trad cath internet larping.
The fact remains that you have a vested interest in defending the “good pedophiles.” You’ve insisted on pointing out the virtues of celibate pedophilia. It’s a bizarre hill to die on; it’s like defending Nazi party members that were not involved with the death camps and promoted environmental conservation. What larger point are you trying to make? That we shouldn’t judge an entire group because some people aren’t as bad? It’s really weird dude and pedophilia being the basis to make this point makes you look really bad,
Nice answerBwahahahahahaaaa!
Remember in the other thread when you called me a "moron" for saying that V for Vendetta came out in 2006, even though it's accurate? You were so sure that it came out in 2005 that you insulted me for thinking otherwise, even though you were wrong.I had to re-watch V for Vendetta in order to know what the hell you were talking about. I'd completely forgotten the scene where Portman dresses as a Lolita to entrap a pedophile priest.
So, three things:
1) This whole thing started when I Tweeted that y'all ignore real pedophilia in the priesthood in favor of imagined pedophilia in SFWA. You don't give a DAMN about pedos if you aren't regularly attacking the Catholic church, and that's a fact!
2) Certainly not my favorite scene if I'd forgotten it.
3) My actual favorite part about the scene is where Bishop Lilliman, the pedo priest in question, dies by getting fed a cyanide-laced communion wafer by V, who was let into the Bishop's home by Evey.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Death camps? I mean we're all on the same side here and all, but... there were no death camps. Someone's gotta say it. Punchin' out!I forgot how this was a forum of Jesuits; I don’t think many folks here have much love for the Church outside of trad cath internet larping.
The fact remains that you have a vested interest in defending the “good pedophiles.” You’ve insisted on pointing out the virtues of celibate pedophilia. It’s a bizarre hill to die on; it’s like defending Nazi party members that were not involved with the death camps and promoted environmental conservation. What larger point are you trying to make? That we shouldn’t judge an entire group because some people aren’t as bad? It’s really weird dude and pedophilia being the basis to make this point makes you look really bad,
Stop saying “y’all” you jackassI had to re-watch V for Vendetta in order to know what the hell you were talking about. I'd completely forgotten the scene where Portman dresses as a Lolita to entrap a pedophile priest.
So, three things:
1) This whole thing started when I Tweeted that y'all ignore real pedophilia in the priesthood in favor of imagined pedophilia in SFWA. You don't give a DAMN about pedos if you aren't regularly attacking the Catholic church, and that's a fact!
2) Certainly not my favorite scene if I'd forgotten it.
3) My actual favorite part about the scene is where Bishop Lilliman, the pedo priest in question, dies by getting fed a cyanide-laced communion wafer by V, who was let into the Bishop's home by Evey.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Yeah we know about satanic catholic priests conducting ritual sex Magik on boys you fucking pedophile retard. But they're not on social media being lolcow virtue signaling buffoons like you and your faggot group. I'd gladly bully them to suicide but they're not online being retards like you. So we will expose and bully you and the pedophile reprobate group at the SFWA. If you guys were to hurt yourself to the point of causing death to yourself then oopsie doodles, no big loss faggotI had to re-watch V for Vendetta in order to know what the hell you were talking about. I'd completely forgotten the scene where Portman dresses as a Lolita to entrap a pedophile priest.
So, three things:
1) This whole thing started when I Tweeted that y'all ignore real pedophilia in the priesthood in favor of imagined pedophilia in SFWA. You don't give a DAMN about pedos if you aren't regularly attacking the Catholic church, and that's a fact!
2) Certainly not my favorite scene if I'd forgotten it.
3) My actual favorite part about the scene is where Bishop Lilliman, the pedo priest in question, dies by getting fed a cyanide-laced communion wafer by V, who was let into the Bishop's home by Evey.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Yeah if there's one this this place it's known for its defending pedophile priests, fucking idiot.I had to re-watch V for Vendetta in order to know what the hell you were talking about. I'd completely forgotten the scene where Portman dresses as a Lolita to entrap a pedophile priest.
So, three things:
1) This whole thing started when I Tweeted that y'all ignore real pedophilia in the priesthood in favor of imagined pedophilia in SFWA. You don't give a DAMN about pedos if you aren't regularly attacking the Catholic church, and that's a fact!
2) Certainly not my favorite scene if I'd forgotten it.
3) My actual favorite part about the scene is where Bishop Lilliman, the pedo priest in question, dies by getting fed a cyanide-laced communion wafer by V, who was let into the Bishop's home by Evey.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Also to claim we’re not aware / ignoring of the long history of Catholic Church pastors sexually abusing young boys is ridiculous. That’s been a well known problem for years in the public eye, we don’t have to keep mentioning something everyone is already aware of. Pretty much since the 90s the stories have been coming out and all those involved have either been brought to Justice or died years ago. Classic “what about ism” from Hildy thinking it’s a “gotcha” when it’s far from it.Yeah we know about satanic catholic priests conducting ritual sex Magik on boys you fucking pedophile retard. But they're not on social media being lolcow virtue signaling buffoons like you and your faggot group. I'd gladly bully them to suicide but they're not online being retards like you. So we will expose and bully you and the pedophile reprobate group at the SFWA. If you guys were to hurt yourself to the point of causing death to yourself then oopsie doodles, no big loss faggot
That’s what really stuck out to me. There’s no point in that movie where she’s dressed super “sexy.” At least for adults with societally acceptable sexual proclivitiesWhich part of v for vendetta were you referring to when you said it was the first time you saw Natalie Portman as a sex symbol?
I had to re-watch V for Vendetta in order to know what the hell you were talking about. I'd completely forgotten the scene where Portman dresses as a Lolita to entrap a pedophile priest.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Remember in the other thread when you called me a "moron" for saying that V for Vendetta came out in 2006, even though it's accurate? You were so sure that it came out in 2005 that you insulted me for thinking otherwise, even though you were wrong.
Think about that concept every time you pointlessly argue something here. For example, your insistence that you are not defending pedophiles in any way. Or, as another example, whether or not your wife is a hideous abomination. Shinkle bout it.
Yes, you do. If you want to label yourselves "anti-pedo" with any degree of credibility, that is.we don’t have to keep mentioning something everyone is already aware of
Maybe not defending, but ignoring in favor of the wrong thing, yeah.Yeah if there's one this this place it's known for its defending pedophile priests, fucking idiot.
Which part of v for vendetta were you referring to when you said it was the first time you saw Natalie Portman as a sex symbol?
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/