- Forum Clout
- 12,216
Now we gotta read it to see if you wrote anything funny
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Mustard just changed his handle to @Roxbury Rick
- Thread starter chocolatehellhole
- Start date
- Forum Clout
- 53,144
Best to ignore it, I've learned from experience.
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
he'll edit the fuck out of it anyway
- Forum Clout
- 53,144
Lol. Baby Boq ass goof.
Dear @chocolatehellhole
I am reaching out as a long-time member of the OnA forums to express my deep concern and frustration with the behavior exhibited by several moderators on this platform. While I have greatly enjoyed the forum and found it to be a source of both community and entertainment, recent experiences have led me to believe that certain moderators are engaging in conduct that borders on bullying. This has made it increasingly difficult to participate in discussions without feeling targeted or unwelcome.
First and foremost, I want to make it clear that this complaint is not about isolated disagreements or differences of opinion. I understand that moderating a comedy forum comes with its challenges, especially in distinguishing humor from harassment. However, I have repeatedly noticed a pattern of behavior that goes beyond fair enforcement of rules and instead reflects a personal bias or even vendetta. Specifically:
1. Unequal Enforcement of Rules: It has become apparent that some moderators enforce rules inconsistently, penalizing certain members for minor infractions while ignoring similar or even more severe violations by others. I have observed posts and comments that align with forum guidelines being flagged or removed without justification, while other, clearly inappropriate content remains untouched. This kind of selective enforcement not only undermines the integrity of the forum but also creates an atmosphere of unfairness and bias.
2. Public Shaming and Humiliation: On multiple occasions, I have witnessed moderators responding to posts or comments with condescending remarks, belittling language, or outright mockery. Instead of addressing issues constructively, some moderators seem to take pleasure in publicly shaming users. This is especially concerning in a forum dedicated to comedy, where a friendly and respectful environment should be prioritized. It is one thing to encourage humor; it is quite another to allow moderators to use their position to ridicule members.
3. Personal Bias and Targeting of Specific Users: There appears to be a trend of targeting certain users who express opinions or styles of humor that may differ from the moderators’ preferences. I, along with other members, have experienced unwarranted scrutiny, with our posts frequently flagged or removed for reasons that remain unclear or poorly explained. This has led to a stifling atmosphere where users feel they must constantly self-censor for fear of triggering a moderator’s personal bias.
4. Lack of Transparency in Decision-Making: When users reach out to moderators for clarification on why their content was removed or flagged, responses are often dismissive or nonexistent. This lack of transparency fosters confusion and frustration, as it is difficult to understand what is considered acceptable when the criteria seem to change based on who is enforcing them. Additionally, attempts to question or appeal a moderator’s decision are often met with hostility or further punishment, discouraging members from seeking clarity.
5. Fostering a Culture of Intimidation: By allowing certain moderators to engage in bullying tactics, the forum inadvertently fosters a culture of intimidation. Members are becoming increasingly reluctant to share their thoughts or contribute for fear of attracting negative attention from moderators. This has a chilling effect on the diversity and vibrancy of the community, as it discourages members from expressing themselves authentically.
6. Ignoring Community Feedback: I know for a fact that multiple members have raised these concerns in the past, only to be dismissed or even punished for speaking out. This disregard for community feedback is particularly disheartening, as it suggests that the forum’s leadership values the authority of moderators over the voices of its members. A successful forum thrives on mutual respect and open communication, yet current practices seem to prioritize control over community-building.
In conclusion, I urge you to seriously consider the grievances I have outlined. Moderators play a crucial role in maintaining a positive and welcoming environment, and it is concerning to see some use this role in ways that are counterproductive, if not outright harmful. I respectfully request that you:
Conduct a review of moderator practices, focusing on instances of bullying, bias, and unfair enforcement.
Implement clear guidelines on respectful communication that apply to moderators as well as members.
Establish a transparent process for appeals and clarifications, so users have a fair opportunity to understand and address any issues.
Actively seek and consider community feedback, ensuring that members feel heard and valued.
Thank you for taking the time to address these concerns. I am hopeful that OnA Forums can once again become a space where humor and open discussion can thrive without fear or favoritism.
Sincerely,
Mustard
I am reaching out as a long-time member of the OnA forums to express my deep concern and frustration with the behavior exhibited by several moderators on this platform. While I have greatly enjoyed the forum and found it to be a source of both community and entertainment, recent experiences have led me to believe that certain moderators are engaging in conduct that borders on bullying. This has made it increasingly difficult to participate in discussions without feeling targeted or unwelcome.
First and foremost, I want to make it clear that this complaint is not about isolated disagreements or differences of opinion. I understand that moderating a comedy forum comes with its challenges, especially in distinguishing humor from harassment. However, I have repeatedly noticed a pattern of behavior that goes beyond fair enforcement of rules and instead reflects a personal bias or even vendetta. Specifically:
1. Unequal Enforcement of Rules: It has become apparent that some moderators enforce rules inconsistently, penalizing certain members for minor infractions while ignoring similar or even more severe violations by others. I have observed posts and comments that align with forum guidelines being flagged or removed without justification, while other, clearly inappropriate content remains untouched. This kind of selective enforcement not only undermines the integrity of the forum but also creates an atmosphere of unfairness and bias.
2. Public Shaming and Humiliation: On multiple occasions, I have witnessed moderators responding to posts or comments with condescending remarks, belittling language, or outright mockery. Instead of addressing issues constructively, some moderators seem to take pleasure in publicly shaming users. This is especially concerning in a forum dedicated to comedy, where a friendly and respectful environment should be prioritized. It is one thing to encourage humor; it is quite another to allow moderators to use their position to ridicule members.
3. Personal Bias and Targeting of Specific Users: There appears to be a trend of targeting certain users who express opinions or styles of humor that may differ from the moderators’ preferences. I, along with other members, have experienced unwarranted scrutiny, with our posts frequently flagged or removed for reasons that remain unclear or poorly explained. This has led to a stifling atmosphere where users feel they must constantly self-censor for fear of triggering a moderator’s personal bias.
4. Lack of Transparency in Decision-Making: When users reach out to moderators for clarification on why their content was removed or flagged, responses are often dismissive or nonexistent. This lack of transparency fosters confusion and frustration, as it is difficult to understand what is considered acceptable when the criteria seem to change based on who is enforcing them. Additionally, attempts to question or appeal a moderator’s decision are often met with hostility or further punishment, discouraging members from seeking clarity.
5. Fostering a Culture of Intimidation: By allowing certain moderators to engage in bullying tactics, the forum inadvertently fosters a culture of intimidation. Members are becoming increasingly reluctant to share their thoughts or contribute for fear of attracting negative attention from moderators. This has a chilling effect on the diversity and vibrancy of the community, as it discourages members from expressing themselves authentically.
6. Ignoring Community Feedback: I know for a fact that multiple members have raised these concerns in the past, only to be dismissed or even punished for speaking out. This disregard for community feedback is particularly disheartening, as it suggests that the forum’s leadership values the authority of moderators over the voices of its members. A successful forum thrives on mutual respect and open communication, yet current practices seem to prioritize control over community-building.
In conclusion, I urge you to seriously consider the grievances I have outlined. Moderators play a crucial role in maintaining a positive and welcoming environment, and it is concerning to see some use this role in ways that are counterproductive, if not outright harmful. I respectfully request that you:
Conduct a review of moderator practices, focusing on instances of bullying, bias, and unfair enforcement.
Implement clear guidelines on respectful communication that apply to moderators as well as members.
Establish a transparent process for appeals and clarifications, so users have a fair opportunity to understand and address any issues.
Actively seek and consider community feedback, ensuring that members feel heard and valued.
Thank you for taking the time to address these concerns. I am hopeful that OnA Forums can once again become a space where humor and open discussion can thrive without fear or favoritism.
Sincerely,
Mustard
- Forum Clout
- 119,561
And His name is Abe Vigoda.
- Forum Clout
- 23,375
How far we've fallen. Annoying infighting consisting of the same people over and fucking over, Somali politics and various other extremely unfunny shit. Holy Christ people, 5-10 posts a day is a lot, 100 is fucking insane.
- Forum Clout
- 53,144
No amount of times you spam this shit will make people care about your opinion.
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
Mods, can you permanently change Mustard's status to "edited 14 minutes ago"
Its a chatgpt spam letter originally meant for choc but I'm using to discourage/ muck up the thread
- Forum Clout
- 53,144
You've changed since you joined the revolutionary committee.
- Forum Clout
- 53,144
No one cares, go fuck your retarded ass.
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
Well keep it up, that kinda gas could get this baby to page 10
- Forum Clout
- 53,144
Good cop/bad cop to mustard. Quality bit.
Dear @chocolatehellhole
I am reaching out as a long-time member of the OnA forums to express my deep concern and frustration with the behavior exhibited by several moderators on this platform. While I have greatly enjoyed the forum and found it to be a source of both community and entertainment, recent experiences have led me to believe that certain moderators are engaging in conduct that borders on bullying. This has made it increasingly difficult to participate in discussions without feeling targeted or unwelcome.
First and foremost, I want to make it clear that this complaint is not about isolated disagreements or differences of opinion. I understand that moderating a comedy forum comes with its challenges, especially in distinguishing humor from harassment. However, I have repeatedly noticed a pattern of behavior that goes beyond fair enforcement of rules and instead reflects a personal bias or even vendetta. Specifically:
1. Unequal Enforcement of Rules: It has become apparent that some moderators enforce rules inconsistently, penalizing certain members for minor infractions while ignoring similar or even more severe violations by others. I have observed posts and comments that align with forum guidelines being flagged or removed without justification, while other, clearly inappropriate content remains untouched. This kind of selective enforcement not only undermines the integrity of the forum but also creates an atmosphere of unfairness and bias.
2. Public Shaming and Humiliation: On multiple occasions, I have witnessed moderators responding to posts or comments with condescending remarks, belittling language, or outright mockery. Instead of addressing issues constructively, some moderators seem to take pleasure in publicly shaming users. This is especially concerning in a forum dedicated to comedy, where a friendly and respectful environment should be prioritized. It is one thing to encourage humor; it is quite another to allow moderators to use their position to ridicule members.
3. Personal Bias and Targeting of Specific Users: There appears to be a trend of targeting certain users who express opinions or styles of humor that may differ from the moderators’ preferences. I, along with other members, have experienced unwarranted scrutiny, with our posts frequently flagged or removed for reasons that remain unclear or poorly explained. This has led to a stifling atmosphere where users feel they must constantly self-censor for fear of triggering a moderator’s personal bias.
4. Lack of Transparency in Decision-Making: When users reach out to moderators for clarification on why their content was removed or flagged, responses are often dismissive or nonexistent. This lack of transparency fosters confusion and frustration, as it is difficult to understand what is considered acceptable when the criteria seem to change based on who is enforcing them. Additionally, attempts to question or appeal a moderator’s decision are often met with hostility or further punishment, discouraging members from seeking clarity.
5. Fostering a Culture of Intimidation: By allowing certain moderators to engage in bullying tactics, the forum inadvertently fosters a culture of intimidation. Members are becoming increasingly reluctant to share their thoughts or contribute for fear of attracting negative attention from moderators. This has a chilling effect on the diversity and vibrancy of the community, as it discourages members from expressing themselves authentically.
6. Ignoring Community Feedback: I know for a fact that multiple members have raised these concerns in the past, only to be dismissed or even punished for speaking out. This disregard for community feedback is particularly disheartening, as it suggests that the forum’s leadership values the authority of moderators over the voices of its members. A successful forum thrives on mutual respect and open communication, yet current practices seem to prioritize control over community-building.
In conclusion, I urge you to seriously consider the grievances I have outlined. Moderators play a crucial role in maintaining a positive and welcoming environment, and it is concerning to see some use this role in ways that are counterproductive, if not outright harmful. I respectfully request that you:
Conduct a review of moderator practices, focusing on instances of bullying, bias, and unfair enforcement.
Implement clear guidelines on respectful communication that apply to moderators as well as members.
Establish a transparent process for appeals and clarifications, so users have a fair opportunity to understand and address any issues.
Actively seek and consider community feedback, ensuring that members feel heard and valued.
Thank you for taking the time to address these concerns. I am hopeful that OnA Forums can once again become a space where humor and open discussion can thrive without fear or favoritism.
Sincerely,
Mustard
I am reaching out as a long-time member of the OnA forums to express my deep concern and frustration with the behavior exhibited by several moderators on this platform. While I have greatly enjoyed the forum and found it to be a source of both community and entertainment, recent experiences have led me to believe that certain moderators are engaging in conduct that borders on bullying. This has made it increasingly difficult to participate in discussions without feeling targeted or unwelcome.
First and foremost, I want to make it clear that this complaint is not about isolated disagreements or differences of opinion. I understand that moderating a comedy forum comes with its challenges, especially in distinguishing humor from harassment. However, I have repeatedly noticed a pattern of behavior that goes beyond fair enforcement of rules and instead reflects a personal bias or even vendetta. Specifically:
1. Unequal Enforcement of Rules: It has become apparent that some moderators enforce rules inconsistently, penalizing certain members for minor infractions while ignoring similar or even more severe violations by others. I have observed posts and comments that align with forum guidelines being flagged or removed without justification, while other, clearly inappropriate content remains untouched. This kind of selective enforcement not only undermines the integrity of the forum but also creates an atmosphere of unfairness and bias.
2. Public Shaming and Humiliation: On multiple occasions, I have witnessed moderators responding to posts or comments with condescending remarks, belittling language, or outright mockery. Instead of addressing issues constructively, some moderators seem to take pleasure in publicly shaming users. This is especially concerning in a forum dedicated to comedy, where a friendly and respectful environment should be prioritized. It is one thing to encourage humor; it is quite another to allow moderators to use their position to ridicule members.
3. Personal Bias and Targeting of Specific Users: There appears to be a trend of targeting certain users who express opinions or styles of humor that may differ from the moderators’ preferences. I, along with other members, have experienced unwarranted scrutiny, with our posts frequently flagged or removed for reasons that remain unclear or poorly explained. This has led to a stifling atmosphere where users feel they must constantly self-censor for fear of triggering a moderator’s personal bias.
4. Lack of Transparency in Decision-Making: When users reach out to moderators for clarification on why their content was removed or flagged, responses are often dismissive or nonexistent. This lack of transparency fosters confusion and frustration, as it is difficult to understand what is considered acceptable when the criteria seem to change based on who is enforcing them. Additionally, attempts to question or appeal a moderator’s decision are often met with hostility or further punishment, discouraging members from seeking clarity.
5. Fostering a Culture of Intimidation: By allowing certain moderators to engage in bullying tactics, the forum inadvertently fosters a culture of intimidation. Members are becoming increasingly reluctant to share their thoughts or contribute for fear of attracting negative attention from moderators. This has a chilling effect on the diversity and vibrancy of the community, as it discourages members from expressing themselves authentically.
6. Ignoring Community Feedback: I know for a fact that multiple members have raised these concerns in the past, only to be dismissed or even punished for speaking out. This disregard for community feedback is particularly disheartening, as it suggests that the forum’s leadership values the authority of moderators over the voices of its members. A successful forum thrives on mutual respect and open communication, yet current practices seem to prioritize control over community-building.
In conclusion, I urge you to seriously consider the grievances I have outlined. Moderators play a crucial role in maintaining a positive and welcoming environment, and it is concerning to see some use this role in ways that are counterproductive, if not outright harmful. I respectfully request that you:
Conduct a review of moderator practices, focusing on instances of bullying, bias, and unfair enforcement.
Implement clear guidelines on respectful communication that apply to moderators as well as members.
Establish a transparent process for appeals and clarifications, so users have a fair opportunity to understand and address any issues.
Actively seek and consider community feedback, ensuring that members feel heard and valued.
Thank you for taking the time to address these concerns. I am hopeful that OnA Forums can once again become a space where humor and open discussion can thrive without fear or favoritism.
Sincerely,
Mustard
- Forum Clout
- 53,144
Be patient with him, he's a tiny bit completely fucking retarded.
- Forum Clout
- 32,898
He never learned to squat. He just does it standing up and his mom has to get in there with a melon baller to clean it out
- Forum Clout
- 53,144
So many paper towels wasted in the @Mustard house hold.
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
How it started
new.onaforums.net
How it's going
HR@PaneraBread isn't funny
Analysis has shown that you write long-winded dreck and should immediately quit posting. First and final warning.
new.onaforums.net
How it's going