- Forum Clout
- 12,216
Stop, Abe. You don't know what you're saying!
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Mustard just changed his handle to @Roxbury Rick
- Thread starter chocolatehellhole
- Start date
- Forum Clout
- 53,142
We've already won. We've got the hostages, @TheGhostOfAbeVigoda , they'll pay for our flight to Cuba. We can finally be together.
- Forum Clout
- 32,887
@TheGhostOfAbeVigoda do you think Turk likes fire?????
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
hey we're on page 6 wouldja look at that
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
Maybe give the Cuba plan a coupla months, bud. It's a bit rainy down there right now
- Forum Clout
- 32,887
It's turned into another Terry Fox Presents Abe Vigoda's Canadian Thanksgiving Spectacular Megathread deal. You asked for this. You came to us hat in hand and begged for it.
- Forum Clout
- 53,142
How long do you expect me to keep the American hostages? You gotta feed them and shit.
- Forum Clout
- 63,952
I mean Christ even Mexico grew a set of balls and told Spain to fuck off in the 1800s.
Meanwhile Toronto is buying tickets to Empire Strikes Back and happily sending tax dollars away to be spent on fancy new Buckingham Palace hats.
- Forum Clout
- 86,773
I’m sorry, do I have a sign on my door that says dead Canuck storage?
- Forum Clout
- 53,142
To our American friends this is a reference to black October when the Quebecois kidnapped a British politician and negotiated a flight to Cuba for his return.
- Forum Clout
- 32,887
It was a much better play to say FUCK YOU, DAD and run off to be a thrall of Israel (an invention of Britain btw)
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
well hat in hand is a bit of a stretch but yes we did ask for it. It's a good thing we're out of the office in 90 minutes and if people could just keep this towards the top-ish of page 1 'til backup gets here at around 3am........
- Forum Clout
- 53,142
We respect our ancestry. Unlike our goof ass neighbors
- Forum Clout
- 63,952
For the record, wikipedia considers yours the third most important black October behind some Russian nonsense and Algerian rioting:
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
- Forum Clout
- 53,142
Largest country in North America has a king. Fuck you, we dig it.
Dear @chocolatehellhole
I am reaching out as a long-time member of the OnA forums to express my deep concern and frustration with the behavior exhibited by several moderators on this platform. While I have greatly enjoyed the forum and found it to be a source of both community and entertainment, recent experiences have led me to believe that certain moderators are engaging in conduct that borders on bullying. This has made it increasingly difficult to participate in discussions without feeling targeted or unwelcome.
First and foremost, I want to make it clear that this complaint is not about isolated disagreements or differences of opinion. I understand that moderating a comedy forum comes with its challenges, especially in distinguishing humor from harassment. However, I have repeatedly noticed a pattern of behavior that goes beyond fair enforcement of rules and instead reflects a personal bias or even vendetta. Specifically:
1. Unequal Enforcement of Rules: It has become apparent that some moderators enforce rules inconsistently, penalizing certain members for minor infractions while ignoring similar or even more severe violations by others. I have observed posts and comments that align with forum guidelines being flagged or removed without justification, while other, clearly inappropriate content remains untouched. This kind of selective enforcement not only undermines the integrity of the forum but also creates an atmosphere of unfairness and bias.
2. Public Shaming and Humiliation: On multiple occasions, I have witnessed moderators responding to posts or comments with condescending remarks, belittling language, or outright mockery. Instead of addressing issues constructively, some moderators seem to take pleasure in publicly shaming users. This is especially concerning in a forum dedicated to comedy, where a friendly and respectful environment should be prioritized. It is one thing to encourage humor; it is quite another to allow moderators to use their position to ridicule members.
3. Personal Bias and Targeting of Specific Users: There appears to be a trend of targeting certain users who express opinions or styles of humor that may differ from the moderators’ preferences. I, along with other members, have experienced unwarranted scrutiny, with our posts frequently flagged or removed for reasons that remain unclear or poorly explained. This has led to a stifling atmosphere where users feel they must constantly self-censor for fear of triggering a moderator’s personal bias.
4. Lack of Transparency in Decision-Making: When users reach out to moderators for clarification on why their content was removed or flagged, responses are often dismissive or nonexistent. This lack of transparency fosters confusion and frustration, as it is difficult to understand what is considered acceptable when the criteria seem to change based on who is enforcing them. Additionally, attempts to question or appeal a moderator’s decision are often met with hostility or further punishment, discouraging members from seeking clarity.
5. Fostering a Culture of Intimidation: By allowing certain moderators to engage in bullying tactics, the forum inadvertently fosters a culture of intimidation. Members are becoming increasingly reluctant to share their thoughts or contribute for fear of attracting negative attention from moderators. This has a chilling effect on the diversity and vibrancy of the community, as it discourages members from expressing themselves authentically.
6. Ignoring Community Feedback: I know for a fact that multiple members have raised these concerns in the past, only to be dismissed or even punished for speaking out. This disregard for community feedback is particularly disheartening, as it suggests that the forum’s leadership values the authority of moderators over the voices of its members. A successful forum thrives on mutual respect and open communication, yet current practices seem to prioritize control over community-building.
In conclusion, I urge you to seriously consider the grievances I have outlined. Moderators play a crucial role in maintaining a positive and welcoming environment, and it is concerning to see some use this role in ways that are counterproductive, if not outright harmful. I respectfully request that you:
Conduct a review of moderator practices, focusing on instances of bullying, bias, and unfair enforcement.
Implement clear guidelines on respectful communication that apply to moderators as well as members.
Establish a transparent process for appeals and clarifications, so users have a fair opportunity to understand and address any issues.
Actively seek and consider community feedback, ensuring that members feel heard and valued.
Thank you for taking the time to address these concerns. I am hopeful that OnA Forums can once again become a space where humor and open discussion can thrive without fear or favoritism.
Sincerely,
Mustard
I am reaching out as a long-time member of the OnA forums to express my deep concern and frustration with the behavior exhibited by several moderators on this platform. While I have greatly enjoyed the forum and found it to be a source of both community and entertainment, recent experiences have led me to believe that certain moderators are engaging in conduct that borders on bullying. This has made it increasingly difficult to participate in discussions without feeling targeted or unwelcome.
First and foremost, I want to make it clear that this complaint is not about isolated disagreements or differences of opinion. I understand that moderating a comedy forum comes with its challenges, especially in distinguishing humor from harassment. However, I have repeatedly noticed a pattern of behavior that goes beyond fair enforcement of rules and instead reflects a personal bias or even vendetta. Specifically:
1. Unequal Enforcement of Rules: It has become apparent that some moderators enforce rules inconsistently, penalizing certain members for minor infractions while ignoring similar or even more severe violations by others. I have observed posts and comments that align with forum guidelines being flagged or removed without justification, while other, clearly inappropriate content remains untouched. This kind of selective enforcement not only undermines the integrity of the forum but also creates an atmosphere of unfairness and bias.
2. Public Shaming and Humiliation: On multiple occasions, I have witnessed moderators responding to posts or comments with condescending remarks, belittling language, or outright mockery. Instead of addressing issues constructively, some moderators seem to take pleasure in publicly shaming users. This is especially concerning in a forum dedicated to comedy, where a friendly and respectful environment should be prioritized. It is one thing to encourage humor; it is quite another to allow moderators to use their position to ridicule members.
3. Personal Bias and Targeting of Specific Users: There appears to be a trend of targeting certain users who express opinions or styles of humor that may differ from the moderators’ preferences. I, along with other members, have experienced unwarranted scrutiny, with our posts frequently flagged or removed for reasons that remain unclear or poorly explained. This has led to a stifling atmosphere where users feel they must constantly self-censor for fear of triggering a moderator’s personal bias.
4. Lack of Transparency in Decision-Making: When users reach out to moderators for clarification on why their content was removed or flagged, responses are often dismissive or nonexistent. This lack of transparency fosters confusion and frustration, as it is difficult to understand what is considered acceptable when the criteria seem to change based on who is enforcing them. Additionally, attempts to question or appeal a moderator’s decision are often met with hostility or further punishment, discouraging members from seeking clarity.
5. Fostering a Culture of Intimidation: By allowing certain moderators to engage in bullying tactics, the forum inadvertently fosters a culture of intimidation. Members are becoming increasingly reluctant to share their thoughts or contribute for fear of attracting negative attention from moderators. This has a chilling effect on the diversity and vibrancy of the community, as it discourages members from expressing themselves authentically.
6. Ignoring Community Feedback: I know for a fact that multiple members have raised these concerns in the past, only to be dismissed or even punished for speaking out. This disregard for community feedback is particularly disheartening, as it suggests that the forum’s leadership values the authority of moderators over the voices of its members. A successful forum thrives on mutual respect and open communication, yet current practices seem to prioritize control over community-building.
In conclusion, I urge you to seriously consider the grievances I have outlined. Moderators play a crucial role in maintaining a positive and welcoming environment, and it is concerning to see some use this role in ways that are counterproductive, if not outright harmful. I respectfully request that you:
Conduct a review of moderator practices, focusing on instances of bullying, bias, and unfair enforcement.
Implement clear guidelines on respectful communication that apply to moderators as well as members.
Establish a transparent process for appeals and clarifications, so users have a fair opportunity to understand and address any issues.
Actively seek and consider community feedback, ensuring that members feel heard and valued.
Thank you for taking the time to address these concerns. I am hopeful that OnA Forums can once again become a space where humor and open discussion can thrive without fear or favoritism.
Sincerely,
Mustard
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
It feels like this company has done more for international relations than 4 years of Commander Sleepy with this thread
- Forum Clout
- 12,216
Had to zoom out for this one
- Forum Clout
- 53,142