I’m sure he’s gonna tweet out “GUILTY!” instead of having a nuanced take that this doesn’t matter.
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal (himself) to a troll.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never shown this video footage during any of his media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergencies (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
-
Starting July 4th midnight EST, all messages older than 1 month will be automatically pruned.
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Will Pat have a victory lap?
- Thread starter Sue Lightning
- Start date
I’m sure he’s gonna tweet out “GUILTY!” instead of having a nuanced take that this doesn’t matter.
Trump colluded with Russia to make this happen, child.
How the fuck can anybody defend Biden? He's been a disaster.
Is Trump a petty old fag? Yes. But you can't deny the guys work ethic and ambition.
Is Trump a petty old fag? Yes. But you can't deny the guys work ethic and ambition.
Pat is in cope mode at the moment
I’m sure Moo Cumia will be pretty pleased, in any case. It’s the least God can do for making the old girl’s teeth fall out lol
Typical Pat - “literally millions are guilty” but has zero proof of this claim. Pretty sure most legal gun owners aren’t also crack heads - just like how the majority of gun violence is not legal gun owners. Also, how many of these mass shooters were NRA members? They get blamed with this claim over and over yet haven’t seen an NRA member that was also a mass shooter.
Id imagine there are plenty of people that smoke weed that are gun owners so they would still fall under this. I agree its a shitty law in regards to weed. Crack is a different ballgame but both are still federally illegal as of now. Look at Niki. She owns a gun and smokes weed.
Weed is a bit of a grey area since so many states have legalized it. Does it count as an illegal drug on a form in a state that has legal weed? Aren’t they trying to change the laws on stuff like that?
Also, I’m guessing the majority of this was related to was he an “addict” at the time because I know from people that went to rehab are told they are “always” an addict even if they never touch it again. They do a lot of bullshit in those rehab programs - like you’re called a drug addict (and always a drug addict) even if you’re just a drunk and don’t touch illegal drugs because alcohol is a drug - but so is caffeine yet they don’t call someone hooked on caffeine a drug addict etc.
It does count on the background check. You will get denied if you answer that you have been involved with weed. Id imagine they are trying to get that particular detail removed but last I checked its still a No Go. Seems silly to me. I live in a legal state and the legal pot farmers all own guns. Especially since some cant even use the banks to keep their piles of money safe because the banks dont want to be involved due to the federal laws. At this point it just gives the feds leverage if/when they find a gun on the farm property no matter how legal their grow is.
The defense was quite literally arguing that just days before Hunter bought the gun, when he was telling his brothers widow “I’m going to buy crack from Mookie!!” he wasnt REALLY going to buy crack, just trying to avoid seeing her! And ok, even if he was smoking crack, he didn’t CONSIDER himself an addict so it’s all good!
If I went and got a medical marijuana card I could not buy a firearm. So the idea that you can literally smoke crack before and after buying a gun but be all good on the technical definition of an “addict” or “user” is fucking ridiculous
More like a victory lappening tsss
Trump says he will pardon Hunter
Did pat get his talking points from @Sue Lightning ?
Yeah that’s what it sounds like - the whole “active” addict part and what is considered one. Like I said I know in those rehab programs they tell you you’re always a drug addict even if you never use again because you have a “problem” that never goes away. Of course I don’t think they applied to Hunter as he was using during the time but not “all the time” and that makes it ok or something stupid
“Look if you pardon me i’ll pardon your son!!”
Does he realize Biden already has the power to do this and explicitly said he wouldn’t use it?
Trust me even I am not this braindead level of partisan.
Imagine getting emotionally invested in defending a Trust Fund crackhead who uses corrupt connections to get 50k/month no show jobs
Pat comment?