- Forum Clout
- 15,854
And it's not like the jury wasn't threaten in anyway what so ever
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
WHOA!!! And guess what? He “””found””” these charges with EVIDENCE. Evidence that went in front of a grand jury who said “indict this guy”, and now, the evidence was so overwhelming, and the prosecutors made such a cohesive case that he’s guilty, that he was convicted.The DA was on a mission to find charges to bring in the first place
Refer to above. If there were no evidence, the prosecution has no case. If theres no case, theres no guilty verdict. And if Trump were innocent and this really were some shit invented out of thin air maybe his defense wouldn’t have done such a poor job making him look innocent.and the judge sets the conditions of the trial and sets the sentence.
fine im stupid. we can get that out of the way. What am i supposed to do with this as a response? There's just a bunch of claims there. This is a court case. How would I know its bullshit without understanding the details of the case?
You're working backwards from the conclusion it is bullshit. How would I possibly know this?
You're calling me an idiot (or whatever midwit is meant to imply) and saying to see the bigger picture.
"half the country just lost any trust in the judiciary because of some petty shit." - Is that a bad thing ? Should i care what people think who form opinions without the necessary information?
If the is too dumb and autistic for you to answer then don't. But i have no clue what you're even trying to convey here.
Judges are impartial, than why are the rest of your faggot friends crying because Scalia's wife flew a flag upside down outside their home?I hope you realize judges don’t determine if someone is guilty or not. Didn’t you all call me a retard for this. If you read the transcripts of the trial at all you would realize the judge has carried this out extremely impartially. Wow, he’s a Democrat, almost like that’s a consequence of us having weirdly partisan judges in the USA. Wow, his daughter donated to Democrats, and the courts found that wasn’t necessary for a recusal. You would know any of this if you knew anything about the trial at all.
This is a consequence of DA’s being partisan elected officials. What are you even implying with the prosecutor. His job is to present a case to convict the defendant. So he’s being paid by the anti-defendant league and thats a …conflict of interest? For who? The prosecutor would be MORE inclined to…do his job?
Fucking wrong and such a bad analogy, holy shit you know nothing about this case. Why are you even trying to argue it.
What the fuck does that have to do with anything? If they stopped John Gotti from talking about witnesses and the prosecutors / court officials to possibly intimidate them you would think thats illegal or wrong?
I don't know that. How would I know that?Well for starters, 34 counts for a case is retarded. The higher the count, the more bullshit it usually is.
But you know that
Reread it stupit! I said they’re weirdly partisan. I didn’t say they were impartial - They only can ACT impartially…sometimesJudges are impartial, than why are the rest of your faggot friends crying because Scalia's wife flew a flag upside down outside their home?
I don't know that? How would I know that?
Trump was on that list and had it destroyed while he was president
Trump probably did that shit and he’s a dummy but the question that should be asked is does someone other than trump have to deal with this.
Something stinks and it isn’t me
He’s mike pence.What job, why are you making less and how is that tied to a specific presidential power and action taken.
i'm sorry i did that. i'm embarrassed i did thatOh fuck off and quit playing nigger
YOU USED TO BE MY HERO!!!!!
The implication is that Scalia cannot act impartially because of his wife. And Thomas should be outright removed because he got perks from holding the job. Yet judges can have TDS for eight years and its totally reasonable? The judge in the E. Jean Carroll case acted totally professionally? Mugging for the camera and laughing in court? Interesting.Reread it stupit! I said they’re weirdly partisan. I didn’t say they were impartial - They only can ACT impartially…sometimes
Wow youre confident on your opinion of the law despite just saying you know nothing about it. I’m gonna pose the same question you asked me about Trumps charges - Explain to me how Obama getting paid millions to give fake speeches is a crime, and why it should be. (If it is - I won’t waste your time, it is not.)Meanwhile Obama gets paid millions to give fake speeches to banks he enriched etc.
The law is a weapon, nothing more.
You’ve said his name two times. You know Scalias dead and they’re mad about Alito, right…The implication is that Scalia cannot act impartially because of his wife.
What you’re failing to leave out is none of them former justices you mentioned are being removed from power. Neither are these TDS ones. I dont know what your point isAnd Thomas should be outright removed because he got perks from holding the job. Yet judges can have TDS for eight years and its totally reasonable
I was talking about this case stupit.The judge in the E. Jean Carroll case acted totally professionally? Mugging for the camera and laughing in court? Interesting.
2024 has been better than any time in the last 20 years.any other president I would agree with you , but Trump brought back a lot of money buying power. Jesus, compare 2018 to 2023.
Wow youre confident on your opinion of the law despite just saying you know nothing about it. I’m gonna pose the same question you asked me about Trumps charges - Explain to me how Obama getting paid millions to give fake speeches is a crime, and why it should be. (If it is - I won’t waste your time, it is not.)
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/