• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

The Pigdependent - Meet Patrick S. Tomlinson: The most ‘swatted’ man in America

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
118,461
This is quite an accusation:

View attachment 181657
Your honor I point to Wisconsin Legislature 893.82, specifically section 3:

“Except as provided in sub. (5m), no civil action or civil proceeding may be brought against any state officer, employee or agent for or on account of any act growing out of or committed in the course of the discharge of the officer's, employee's or agent's duties.”

So yeah Patrick. Good luck with trying to get qualified immunity removed in Wisconsin first.
 
Forum Clout
1,077
Some thoughts or things I don’t understand:

-That guy who did that podcast (the 4 episode one where he interviewed Pat) had the journalistic integrity to reach out to Admin and even Dan for “our side”. This, meanwhile, is a national newspaper, and they didn’t even do the bullshit “We contacted them for comment and received no reply.” Nope, just one persons word for the whole article. Do they have an obligation to contact us? No. But even lying about doing so would make this look better for the outlet and Pat himself.
Yeah, I would've enjoyed more logical riddles and thought experiments from @admin.
 

Petworth dude

The Constitution is dead, child.
Forum Clout
7,157
-That guy who did that podcast (the 4 episode one where he interviewed Pat) had the journalistic integrity to reach out to Admin and even Dan for “our side”. This, meanwhile, is a national newspaper, and they didn’t even do the bullshit “We contacted them for comment and received no reply.” Nope, just one persons word for the whole article. Do they have an obligation to contact us? No. But even lying about doing so would make this look better for the outlet and Pat himself.
This is the state of journalism in a nutshell. The only places you're consistently seeing quality journalism are with your "empires" like the New York Times and your "city-states" of independent journalists like Javier. The former have enough staff and resources to do investigative reporting, while he latter can make a decent living on their substack or podcast because they are largely self-employed and don't have a lot of overhead costs. It's these middle ground publications like The Independent and your hometown small city newspaper that are barely clinging on that are producing the kind of half-assed journalism with click bait title because they don't have the resources to do better. (Some of this was ripped from Derek Thompson's podcast, but you get the idea.)
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
78,254
Calling quasi or @admin a blogger is a dangerous misrepresentation of the truth.

A blogger would not necessarily be protected by section 230. They should retract that. Unless of course he’s implying that the verbose “Logic 101” tier posts by admin are a de facto blog…
Likely because the UK doesn't have free speech and definitely doesn't have anything like 230.
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
78,254
Anyone who does feel the need to contact him, don't be a retard and spam him with "your mom's box" and black cock pics. Firmly but politely call the veracity of the article into question with actual, documented facts. The second you're rude or abusive to people like him, you shut down any chance of a correction and just make Pat look like the victim. It's probably better to go over his head to an editor anyway.
countdown to Pat/Jax having a mental breakdown of this. THEY POSTED THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ADDRESS OF A JOURNALIST THAT GOT ALMOST EVERYTHING WRONG THIS IS HARASSMENT" . Get a new dishonest playbook chubby.

Hey Jacko you did the same thing you're just to stupid to send the person an email so you tweet into the void like the pick me fatso you are, "CONTACT ME ABOUT THIS TINY INCORRECT DETAIL"
 
Forum Clout
43,005
Bevan's shitty band:

SmartSelect_20240208-111135_Chrome.jpg
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
118,461
countdown to Pat/Jax having a mental breakdown of this. THEY POSTED THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ADDRESS OF A JOURNALIST THAT GOT ALMOST EVERYTHING WRONG THIS IS HARASSMENT" . Get a new dishonest playbook chubby.

Hey Jacko you did the same thing you're just to stupid to send the person an email so you tweet into the void like the pick me fatso you are, "CONTACT ME ABOUT THIS TINY INCORRECT DETAIL"
Well you see them correcting the record is necessary and righteous. When we correct the record it’s manipulation and terroristic.
 

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
240,424
Some thoughts or things I don’t understand:

-That guy who did that podcast (the 4 episode one where he interviewed Pat) had the journalistic integrity to reach out to Admin and even Dan for “our side”. This, meanwhile, is a national newspaper, and they didn’t even do the bullshit “We contacted them for comment and received no reply.” Nope, just one persons word for the whole article. Do they have an obligation to contact us? No. But even lying about doing so would make this look better for the outlet and Pat himself.

-Anybody who tries to paint this place as having a leader (no less it being one of the bbboys) or a political ideology is wrong. I will not deny we have a right wing slant, no doubt, but we are not motivated by that. It’s a game and it’s funny. If it were about politics people would be too invested or righteous to care about the humor. However, there is an overwhelming interest here in being funny. The SWATtings are wrong for a multitude of reasons, but beyond being illegal and giving Pat sympathy points, it’s not funny. It is not in the interest of this place content wise to do so.

-Addressing the above, anybody who visits here would immediately see we make fun of Joe for being a bovine Trumper. We make fun of Anthonys unrepentant racism. We have at least 10 fags on here. Even if there IS an ideological slant, the slant is not a bias which precludes us from making shit funny, aka the whole point of this place.

-It is truly curious that this article claims the FBI’s warrants for Filone prove he is the SWATter of Patrick. It doesn’t, and nowhere in the FBI files is Patricks case mentioned. Now thats not saying Torswats DIDN’T do those, it’s by his own confession that he did. But it is curious to say the FBI proved this when they didn’t, it is simply Torswats word.

-In reference to above, why can we take Torswats word that he is the one SWATting Patrick, but we CANNOT take his word that Patrick is the one ordering them?

-As others have said, 0 mention of Kiwifarms which is not only more publicized than this place but has been tied to or responsible for literal crimes.
The sudden drop of any mention of KF is really strange - they are obviously much bigger than us and been involved in some way in serious things. This is an Internet forum that laughs at Pat, Joe, Scorch, etc and has many general discussion topics. They mention how many posts are about Pat (is it even accurate or did Pat tell them how many?) but what about ALL the posts here?
 
Forum Clout
43,005
Forum Clout
23,260
This is the state of journalism in a nutshell. The only places you're consistently seeing quality journalism are with your "empires" like the New York Times and your "city-states" of independent journalists like Javier. The former have enough staff and resources to do investigative reporting, while he latter can make a decent living on their substack or podcast because they are largely self-employed and don't have a lot of overhead costs. It's these middle ground publications like The Independent and your hometown small city newspaper that are barely clinging on that are producing the kind of half-assed journalism with click bait title because they don't have the resources to do better. (Some of this was ripped from Derek Thompson's podcast, but you get the idea.)
>New York times
>Quality journalism

Lol
 
Top