• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

RickReternal

I hope people Ouija you tweets after your dead
Forum Clout
50,011
Screenshot-2024-05-02-at-1-44-38-PM.png


Does Officer Petersen suffer from Polio?
House Half-house of horrors. Jesus Christ.
 

Lamont & Tonelli

Brevity is... wit.
Forum Clout
61,995
New complaint just dropped (thanks kiwifarms). Many more details from each incident.

In addition to Lyndon Evans, Patrick now names Milwaukee PD officers Christian Garrido, Bradley Orlando, John Kohler, Jacob Wasechek, Fidah Mustafa, Sean Carleton, Nathaniel Peterson, Paul Vento, and Nicole Plevak.
1714627202949.png

The MPD Defendants Club
 
Forum Clout
46,380
16, dick, never had to be in a lawsuit, but I assume that kind of thing would be first on the list in evidence gathering. While the documents so far read like a very fat retard wrote them, he does apparently have lawyers working on this who can get that kind of thing easily. I wonder if he's writing his own motions to cut costs. It would be classic rick to save 100 dollars on a several hundred thousand dollar lawyer bill by choosing to write the motions himself. It also gives him a chance to add his Professional Author touch that has made him so famous.

It's called "discovery" and when that part of the Milwaukee Grifters' lawsuit commences, it'll be interesting to see whether or not the grifters drop their lawsuit. The city/MPD will also have expert witnesses which are very costly. The grifters, if their lawyers do their jobs, will be warned if they lose this lawsuit they will most likely be on the hook for all of the Defendants' costs and fees. Fatso and his dopey wife are arrogant retards, so they could have a bill which is MUCH higher than Quasi's coming their way if they push this lawsuit to trial.
 

chewtoyrapist

Strong. Confident.
Forum Clout
17,889
One thing I just thought about is how win or lose the lawyers, and to a lesser extent pat, will get theirs in the end unless it blows up in their face in a spectacular way. Isn't this firm featured in one of netflix's true crime bullshits? Everyone involved wants to make a name for themselves, and there's always potential and a payday by needlessly escalating things. Hmm. What point was I making?
 
Forum Clout
46,380
One thing I just thought about is how win or lose the lawyers, and to a lesser extent pat, will get theirs in the end unless it blows up in their face in a spectacular way. Isn't this firm featured in one of netflix's true crime bullshits? Everyone involved wants to make a name for themselves, and there's always potential and a payday by needlessly escalating things. Hmm. What point was I making?

If Fatso's lawyers are fronting the bill in a "no fee unless you collect" situation, that is extremely unlikely, but that's how they can lose their asses on this case. Someone is in all likelihood funding Fatso and the dopey wife's latest frivolous lawsuit.

The city/MPD, and most importantly the taxpayers, could lose the case if it goes to trial and the jury is full of dumb nig-nogs with an axe to grind, like O.J.'s jury, but that's extremely unlikely, especially since the white grifters are white, and very unlikeable and unsympathetic grifters.

Fatso and the dopey wife will keep trying to force them to offer a settlement to avoid a trial, but there's a lot of time and a lot of discovery and motions between now and that deadline.
 

TorquieTwoBeers

Forum Clout
30,365
edit: That was statement 6. Followed by two ad hominems, another one staring with "But", and then a histrionic use of "insanity". I commented way too soon. I kinda pray this it's fake as it's just too fucking dumb.
I have no idea how common it is in legal filings but seeing Pat repeatedly use italics to emotionally emphasize something in this legal filing is hurtin my dear old ribs.
 
Forum Clout
46,380
I have no idea how common it is in legal filings but seeing Pat repeatedly use italics to emotionally emphasize something in this legal filing is hurtin my dear old ribs.

Beginning sentences with "But" is common in legal filings and is technically grammatically correct, or at least accepted.

Using italics for emphasis is even more common and accepted.

It's possible Fatso's lawyers sound just as emotional and dumb as Fatso, but all of this looks like typical legal ramblings by actual lawyers (it's usually their paralegals who write these too depending on the size of the firm).

Edit: If his lawyers took his case for a reduced retainer on the agreement that he and his dopey wife would write most of the motions/arguments/answers, that is also not uncommon. The lawyers will edit what is sent to them by their clients so as to protect themselves from sanctions, etc. before its filed, but the lawyers are doing what is asked of them to do by their clients, and that's their job.
 
Last edited:

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
282,634
Beginning sentences with "But" is common in legal filings and is technically grammatically correct, or at least accepted.

Using italics for emphasis is even more common and accepted.

It's possible Fatso's lawyers sound just as emotional and dumb as Fatso, but all of this looks like typical legal ramblings by actual lawyers (it's usually their paralegals who write these too depending on the size of the firm).

Edit: If his lawyers took his case for a reduced retainer on the agreement that he and his dopey wife would write most of the motions/arguments/answers, that is also not uncommon. The lawyers will edit what is sent to them by their clients so as to protect themselves from sanctions, etc. before its filed, but the lawyers are doing what is asked of them to do by their clients, and that's their job.
I think its pat writing most if not all of it.

Im pretty sure he used " wherefore" in the pro se motion that he filed. I remember making fun of it. I bet a lot of this is a direct copy/paste from that motion filing.

1714632449187.png



Found it

1714632649354.png
 
Forum Clout
46,380
I think its pat writing most if not all of it.

Im pretty sure he used " wherefore" in the pro se motion that he filed. I remember making fun of it. I bet a lot of this is a direct copy/paste from that motion filing.

View attachment 196773


Found it

View attachment 196774

The use of "wherefore" is common too, but again I don't doubt he's sending his own verbose drafts to the lawyers to edit before filing them. Lawyers HATE writing this mundane shit, and smaller firms like the one Fatso and the dopey wife retained aren't big enough to have interns and paralegals easily whisk them out for them.
 
Forum Clout
46,380
What I find interesting is for the amount of times pat claims he was swatted that there are only a handful that he actual references by date in his case.

That will hurt him when everything is broken down incident by incident. If the City Attorneys are doing their jobs, they'll cross reference when the Milwaukee Grifters were out of town, out of the country, at bars, at restaurants, at baseball games, and especially when they had Airbnb guests renting the half-hovel.
 

Black Pat

Whacky nigster
Forum Clout
2,589
One thing I just thought about is how win or lose the lawyers, and to a lesser extent pat, will get theirs in the end unless it blows up in their face in a spectacular way. Isn't this firm featured in one of netflix's true crime bullshits? Everyone involved wants to make a name for themselves, and there's always potential and a payday by needlessly escalating things. Hmm. What point was I making?
His attorneys participated in a Netflix documentary wherein the subject of the documentary had an active lawsuit against Manitowac (WI) county PD for being WRONGFULLY IMPRISONED for 18 YEARS. In the middle of the lolsuit, the subject was arrested for murder, was offered a tiny settlement by the city while awaiting his murder trial, and the documentary basically posits that the subject was framed for murder so the city could get out of the lolsuit. They make a very convincing case even if most people here still think the guy was actually guilty of murder.

In Pat's case, it's not crazy to think that he anticipates being arrested for ordering all the swats to his house from Torswats, so he files a lolsuit against the MPD and hires the same fucking lawyers from the Netflix show to get ahead of it, so that when he is eventually arrested, he can say "Look! They're retaliating against me because I filed a lawsuit against them! They have a history of doing this!"
 
Forum Clout
46,380
His attorneys participated in a Netflix documentary wherein the subject of the documentary had an active lawsuit against Manitowac (WI) county PD for being WRONGFULLY IMPRISONED for 18 YEARS. In the middle of the lolsuit, the subject was arrested for murder, was offered a tiny settlement by the city while awaiting his murder trial, and the documentary basically posits that the subject was framed for murder so the city could get out of the lolsuit. They make a very convincing case even if most people here still think the guy was actually guilty of murder.

In Pat's case, it's not crazy to think that he anticipates being arrested for ordering all the swats to his house from Torswats, so he files a lolsuit against the MPD and hires the same fucking lawyers from the Netflix show to get ahead of it, so that when he is eventually arrested, he can say "Look! They're retaliating against me because I filed a lawsuit against them! They have a history of doing this!"

Don't forget they also allegedly hired that Public Relations woman with the pink hair for their media blitz to sell their bullshit "Most Swatted People Ever" story.
 

Uncle Anthony Cumia

Hot tubs, guns and slack jawed brothers
Forum Clout
33,720
If the SWATtings were real, all ugly dumbo-eared Niki would have to do is show her face but they were faking the SWATS and baiting the cops, it's all so obvious. And he expects a patrol officer to try and overrule his Sergeant on scene when it comes to an uncooperative subject. Pat is truly a special kind of moron.

And I do love that the fucking retard is writing his own legal documents, my God what a show this is.
Yeah I know anytime I tell my manager they are wrong, it goes over well. Lol.
 

porquedealer

Portly Pepperoni Purveyor
Forum Clout
44,852
If the CCTV/bodycam is ambiguous as to what was SAID or actually happened, then Pat will get bodied.
He has literal books worth of "statements" that are provably false/embellished/histrionic/attention seeking that he will have to answer as to their accuracy. Once it's established that he is unreliable in his statements then anything he claims without direct evidence can be tossed.
 

Момент Силышенко

The Butcher of Slutsk
Forum Clout
10,346
View attachment 196693

Suing the police over a he said/she said issue. Suing the police over "I was told on the phone that my home is never to be searched" and expecting everyone to just take your word for it.
can I get a legal contract with cops not to search my home? There are only profitable upsides to that, I think.
 
Top