Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

[Last Word Nelsonn]

Also this is not the NFL thread, but I do want to say that, despite his troubled past leaving Minn and his entire time in OAK, not one person has yet to explain how Randy Moss walked into the 2007 Patriot-Way locker room led by Belichick and Brady and 10 other pro-bowlers, many of whom who had been with the team for a decade or more, and just took over the team.
When Moss wanted to be, not only was he a great teammate and charismatic leader, he was THE man.
He was literally the Ray Lewis of that 2007 Pats team.
It's hard to believe, but when you see their locker room video, you realize they followed his confidence and work ethic, and Brady was second banana.

 

[Jenna]

This latest move by Fatso's lawyers is an aggressive tactic often pulled as a possible trial date nears. Plaintiffs are trying to muscle the Defendants into folding and offering a large settlement to make it go away. Defendants might be fully prepared to allow it to go to trial because they know Fatso and his wife are grifters after a large payday (remember the "I'm going to sue you for millions" video), so as others have mentioned, they won't allow that precedent to be set and encourage other grifters to pull the same shit.

If Fatso and his frump wife want to push this to trial they will likely need to come up with a fuckload more money up front for their lawyers to stay on the case. Trials are extremely expensive and time consuming, especially when going up against a city and a bunch of city employees. The Defendant's attorneys are probably on to them and can smell their desperation to avoid trial. It's doubtful Fatso's attorneys expected the Defendants to allow it to go this far and haven't taken measures to settle it by now. Letting it go to trial would be the best case scenario to make an example out of Fatso and the frump because then they can show the jury (and the public) how Fatso and the frump antagonized everyone involved as well as trying to make celebrities out of themselves with their media blitz. Not to mention entering the thousands(!) of emails, recorded phone calls, bodycam footage, etc. into evidence. Fatso will not be a sympathetic character at all and it's very possible the jury will loathe him and will not want to reward him jack shit.

Anyway, that's all speculation. The Defendants do seem to be keeping their cards close to their chest and aren't allowing the grifters to see what they have in store for them.

Getting to trial is a win for the defense, because it's a civil trial based on Patrick and Niki's emotions. It's not a criminal trial where guilt is assigned, nor is it a BroJo situation where the contract said blah-blah-blah so Joe wins by default. It's a jury of Milwaukee citizens who will need to see Patrick as he wishes to be seen: as a perfect victim who did nothing wrong, and if even he did anything wrong (like scream and threaten the police) he's justified for doing anything.

This means showing bodycam footage of his tantrums, aggressively cross-examining him, bringing up whatever they need to in order to discredit him. Constantly reminding the jury the only damages are so-called emotional ones, pouncing on the obvious slipups Patrick would make under oath.

Supposedly Patrick does a (closed) deposition sometime in early February, at which point Hugkiss will see what a truly unlikable specimen he is, and how he loses his shit over the slightest disagreeance.

 

[CompoundBasement]

Getting to trial is a win for the defense, because it's a civil trial based on Patrick and Niki's emotions. It's not a criminal trial where guilt is assigned, nor is it a BroJo situation where the contract said blah-blah-blah so Joe wins by default. It's a jury of Milwaukee citizens who will need to see Patrick as he wishes to be seen: as a perfect victim who did nothing wrong, and if even he did anything wrong (like scream and threaten the police) he's justified for doing anything.

This means showing bodycam footage of his tantrums, aggressively cross-examining him, bringing up whatever they need to in order to discredit him. Constantly reminding the jury the only damages are so-called emotional ones, pouncing on the obvious slipups Patrick would make under oath.

Supposedly Patrick does a (closed) deposition sometime in early February, at which point Hugkiss will see what a truly unlikable specimen he is, and how he loses his shit over the slightest disagreeance.

When Fatso went up against Quasi and it was nearing the deposition stage Fatso folded like a cheap suit and had his Mommy In Law pay Quasi. He absolutely fears having to sit for a deposition in this case, regardless of it being closed. It will still be used as evidence in trial and courtroom observers (the public) will see the videos.

 

[Gay Faggot.]

Anyway, that's all speculation. The Defendants do seem to be keeping their cards close to their chest and aren't allowing the grifters to see what they have in store for them.

In other words, they’re going to enjoy what happens to them Neeeexxxsst?

 

[New Name]

Also this is not the NFL thread, but I do want to say that, despite his troubled past leaving Minn and his entire time in OAK, not one person has yet to explain how Randy Moss walked into the 2007 Patriot-Way locker room led by Belichick and Brady and 10 other pro-bowlers, many of whom who had been with the team for a decade or more, and just took over the team.
When Moss wanted to be, not only was he a great teammate and charismatic leader, he was THE man.
He was literally the Ray Lewis of that 2007 Pats team.
It's hard to believe, but when you see their locker room video, you realize they followed his confidence and work ethic, and Brady was second banana.

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

Fatso will not be a sympathetic character at all and it's very possible the jury will loathe him and will not want to reward him jack shit.

Yeah

 

[Homeless Andrew]

Also this is not the NFL thread, but I do want to say that, despite his troubled past leaving Minn and his entire time in OAK, not one person has yet to explain how Randy Moss walked into the 2007 Patriot-Way locker room led by Belichick and Brady and 10 other pro-bowlers, many of whom who had been with the team for a decade or more, and just took over the team.
When Moss wanted to be, not only was he a great teammate and charismatic leader, he was THE man.
He was literally the Ray Lewis of that 2007 Pats team.
It's hard to believe, but when you see their locker room video, you realize they followed his confidence and work ethic, and Brady was second banana.

 

[Not-a-nasty-street-shitte]

I presume MPD also is pulling the information from Fatrick, the ugly lesbian and his other pack of losers too? I want to know what is on their clouds.

 

[BudDickman]

View attachment 244340

From the twisted mind of Torque Wheeler

What does the cop overtaking a school bus have anything to do with their liability towards Pat? And all he did was put a note in Pat's mailbox. These guys are starting to sound like Stavros Esquire.

 

[CuntFucker .]

View attachment 244340

From the twisted mind of Torque Wheeler

He brought some New Journalism-like flair to his complaint, nice. The court must love this kind of prose.

 

[Suetonius]

“Why would the state settle?? Evil incompetent libtards!!! You need to punish Pat!!”

Would you take this gamble, not knowing as much as we do about Pat?:

You can pay lawyers for a year. You pay the fat litigant $200,000 to fuck off and save your officers reputations

Or

You can pay lawyers for multiple years. The case goes to trial and the judge rules against you. You owe the fat litigant a million dollars and your officers look like shit because it may come out that they were privately mocking the guy they were SWATting and didn’t care for his concerns.

 

[Dog Eater]

@quasi101 What do you think Patrick will do if offered a reasonable settlement? :)

 

[Suetonius]

Also lol at the mention of “WHY IS THE STATE LETTING THE LITIGANT WRITE MOTIONS AGAINST THEM?!?!” That’s how this works dumbass…The state submitted evidence to the plaintiff because that’s what you have to do during discovery. Based on that new evidence they filed an amended complaint. Do you think the state can just file before they do clarifying evidence that hasn’t even been submitted in a complaint? “Listen, the plaintiff is going to submit a complaint based off discovery evidence that we made fun of him in group chats. It’s not true”

 

[safka15]

Also lol at the mention of “WHY IS THE STATE LETTING THE LITIGANT WRITE MOTIONS AGAINST THEM?!?!” That’s how this works dumbass…The state submitted evidence to the plaintiff because that’s what you have to do during discovery. Based on that new evidence they filed an amended complaint. Do you think the state can just file before they do clarifying evidence that hasn’t even been submitted in a complaint? “Listen, the plaintiff is going to submit a complaint based off discovery evidence that we made fun of him in group chats. It’s not true”

Very BenDovid-like post.

 

[Prison Enjoyer]

Also lol at the mention of “WHY IS THE STATE LETTING THE LITIGANT WRITE MOTIONS AGAINST THEM?!?!” That’s how this works dumbass…The state submitted evidence to the plaintiff because that’s what you have to do during discovery. Based on that new evidence they filed an amended complaint. Do you think the state can just file before they do clarifying evidence that hasn’t even been submitted in a complaint? “Listen, the plaintiff is going to submit a complaint based off discovery evidence that we made fun of him in group chats. It’s not true”

The two joint motions to extend deadlines, written by Odell but filed by Hotchkiss, aren’t “amended complaints”, retard. But you’re right they sure sound like them since Hotchkiss is letting Odell write whatever he wants for him.

Odell’s amend. comp. is an entirely separate document. Sue, your legal “takes” are even more flagrantly dumb than your rental ones. Shut up gay virgin

 

[Suetonius]

The two joint motions to extend deadlines, written by Odell but filed by Hotchkiss, aren’t “amended complaints”, retard. But you’re right they sure sound like them since Hotchkiss is letting Odell write whatever he wants for him.

Alright my point there was wrong I thought you were complaining why Pat filed an amended complaint.

Other point still stands though. It’s in the states interest to just settle, not to fight this

 

[Gay Faggot.]

The two joint motions to extend deadlines, written by Odell but filed by Hotchkiss, aren’t “amended complaints”, retard. But you’re right they sure sound like them since Hotchkiss is letting Odell write whatever he wants for him.

Sue, your legal “takes” are even more flagrantly dumb than your rental ones. Shut up gay virgin

You really, really focus on these lawyers. Do you have a dog in this race? I’m starting to wonder if one of them did something to you, or you’re actually apart of this case somehow. Get it together, comrade.

 

[Suetonius]

You really, really focus on these lawyers. Do you have a dog in this race? I’m starting to wonder if one of them did something to you, or you’re actually apart of this case somehow. Get it together, comrade.

Well they’re two libtards in a gay ass decrepit city. Milwaukee isn’t sending their best

 

[Gay Faggot.]

Well they’re two libtards in a gay ass decrepit city. Milwaukee isn’t sending their best

Yes, they’re libtards in a libtard city. What else would you expect? It’s also more of the constant naming and bringing shit up about them. Milwaukee has never sent their best. Their “best” is known as “The Beast”.

 

[Lard Glug]

“Why would the state settle?? Evil incompetent libtards!!! You need to punish Pat!!”

Would you take this gamble, not knowing as much as we do about Pat?:

You can pay lawyers for a year. You pay the fat litigant $200,000 to fuck off and save your officers reputations

Or

You can pay lawyers for multiple years. The case goes to trial and the judge rules against you. You owe the fat litigant a million dollars and your officers look like shit because it may come out that they were privately mocking the guy they were SWATting and didn’t care for his concerns.

The city has attorneys on payroll. And vicious attorneys that hate people trying to take advantage of the city. They love destroying these people and go on to laugh at how ridiculous these people are. I’ve seen it first hand.