- Forum Clout
- 24,093
Gotta wait til feburary fawwwwk
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
- Thread starter Cumtown Fags
- Start date
Gotta wait til feburary fawwwwk
- Forum Clout
- 77,414
Looks like the case continues to discovery. Who's bankrolling this lolsuit?
- Forum Clout
- 21,453
I don't know what any of this means, but if this goes to discovery, Rick has put himself in a bit of a pickle regarding bodycam footage.
As Rick is accusing them of using excessive force and being dicks about the whole thing, it would benefit the cops to keep the footage sealed, but it would benefit Rick to release it. Can the footage be included in the evidence and not made public just because Rick doesn't want us to see it?
Rick winning a million dollars will be well worth it if we get footage of his micropenis. Hahahahaha.
As Rick is accusing them of using excessive force and being dicks about the whole thing, it would benefit the cops to keep the footage sealed, but it would benefit Rick to release it. Can the footage be included in the evidence and not made public just because Rick doesn't want us to see it?
Rick winning a million dollars will be well worth it if we get footage of his micropenis. Hahahahaha.
Honoria
- Forum Clout
- 7,548
Looks like the most blatant dumb stuff got dismissed. This will drag out longer and cost Rick more money, which is good.
Skimming through this, it almost sounds like they're saying that it's not going to work but they can only dismiss the obvious (Count one with Pat's faucet) right now, but can definitely dismiss the other stuff later.
Skimming through this, it almost sounds like they're saying that it's not going to work but they can only dismiss the obvious (Count one with Pat's faucet) right now, but can definitely dismiss the other stuff later.
- Forum Clout
- 21,453
Does it say they will let the cops plead immunity later?
Rick's not going to read that part.
- Forum Clout
- 2,057
This is the best possible outcome. Let Discovery begin!
- Forum Clout
- 15,106
A partial L for Piggy that he will no doubt try to spin as a victory.
- Forum Clout
- 16,657
Not a lawyer, though I am vaguely aware of a lawyer currently acting like a retard. He can definitely ask to have it sealed for privacy purposes and the PD will oblige to show good faith. If a wealthy benefactor/journalist wanted to push the issue as it concerns public safety and the integrity of law enforcement, there is definitely a case to be made to obtain it. Unfortunately they will have to pay to have rick's weiner censored, so you're not getting it no matter how much you lust for it (,stlaker).
- Forum Clout
- 28,046
Can someone who loves ANAL explain what the "motion to seal... is GRANTED" is referring to? How about "shall hereby remain under restriction". I'll hang up and listen.
- Forum Clout
- 19,132
"Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be granted as to Count I, granted in part and denied in part as to Counts II and III, and denied as to Counts IV through VII."
The counts from the amended pig grease-stained complaint:
COUNT I: July 25, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure
COUNT II: August 11, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT III: October 1, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene.
COUNT IV: March 20, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT V: April 11, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT VI: April 12, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT VII: April 17, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
I wonder if it's just a time-related thing. Either way Rick is going to pony up a bunch of money just to show the world his faucet then get laughed out of court on the grounds of qualified immunity or for not giving any evidence for any crimes. Enjoy the next few months, fatso. We. Will.
The counts from the amended pig grease-stained complaint:
COUNT II: August 11, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT III: October 1, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene.
COUNT IV: March 20, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT V: April 11, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT VI: April 12, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT VII: April 17, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
I wonder if it's just a time-related thing. Either way Rick is going to pony up a bunch of money just to show the world his faucet then get laughed out of court on the grounds of qualified immunity or for not giving any evidence for any crimes. Enjoy the next few months, fatso. We. Will.
Honoria
- Forum Clout
- 7,548
I think so, they're saying not now but later.
Also saying that documents will be sealed if they would be used by "alleged harassers". Whatever Exhibit A is = the big one that's sealed.
- Forum Clout
- 36,642
Pure speculation but I think the one and only sealed exhibit is the faucet video lmfao
Edit: I just reread he previous order and Exhibit A is actually copies of police reports for each day they went. Not sure whether bodycams would fall under this or not?
Last edited:
- Forum Clout
- 28,046
lmao they tried to cuff him but couldn't corral him. Picture a bunch of cops chasing a greased up pig at the county fair.
- Forum Clout
- 21,453
Pure speculation but I think the one and only sealed exhibit is the faucet video lmfao
I didn't even read that part and I knew ECF No. 30 was referring to the faucet footage when I saw it in the opening summary haha what else could it possibly be?
- Forum Clout
- 21,453
Wait so Rick emailed the cops just to tell them they didn't hand cuff him? What was the fucking point of doing that?
"Haha you couldn't handcuff me despite your best efforts, please remove that from the reporT"? What a fucking pain in the ass lol
"Haha you couldn't handcuff me despite your best efforts, please remove that from the reporT"? What a fucking pain in the ass lol
- Forum Clout
- 44,037
I will not stop protesting until every man, woman, and child on Twitter has seen Rick’s penis. This is my publicly stated goal
- Forum Clout
- 121,965
You’re a literal fucking idiot. Yeah, if bodycams are unsealed, magically Pat would somehow obtain them. And magically Pat would also post them to…own his trolls or something? I’m sure the courts will just let you post the opposing sides evidence on social media.
- Forum Clout
- 77,414
Can we get a topless photo of your girl's jugs if we see the Faucet?
- Forum Clout
- 99,621
count 1 out because nobody knew back then
he could re-submit count 1 but the judge is saying don't bother
count 2&3 out as to the City because there was no established "pattern" policymakers ignored
but the cops are still on the hook
count 4, 5, 6 and 7 go forward
he could re-submit count 1 but the judge is saying don't bother
count 2&3 out as to the City because there was no established "pattern" policymakers ignored
but the cops are still on the hook
count 4, 5, 6 and 7 go forward
- Forum Clout
- 63,942
I skimmed through the brief on KF, and I'm a below-average idiot who has seen a couple episodes of Suits, but my two takeaways from it were:
1. The judge still sees Rick as a special WHYUS boy and perfect little angel who is never to blame for anything. Which tbf the MPD needs to prove but I guess they figured qualified immunity would be all they needed. The judge seems to conclude that Patrick was a bit frustrated but otherwise respectful and calm during all these interactions, thus the officers had no probable cause to search his property. The reality is he was belligerent, probably drunk, screaming threats at the officers and lunging at them.
2. The case seems mostly to be about the officer's prior awareness that this was a "swatting location", which is why the first count was dismissed. The issue is if the police ever went "hey another call to that Tomlinson prick's house, let's go over and fuck with him again". But I'm not sure how Patrick intends to prove this is the case unless some idiot cop said so much while wearing a bodycam. If all Patrick has is his narcissistic "I know what everybody else is thinking and don't have to prove anything" reasons as to why the police were targeting him, his case is dead. As it is, Satistfy Monell has become the new Satisfy Krinsky, and once again I don't see any reasonable way how Rick could get satisfaction.
1. The judge still sees Rick as a special WHYUS boy and perfect little angel who is never to blame for anything. Which tbf the MPD needs to prove but I guess they figured qualified immunity would be all they needed. The judge seems to conclude that Patrick was a bit frustrated but otherwise respectful and calm during all these interactions, thus the officers had no probable cause to search his property. The reality is he was belligerent, probably drunk, screaming threats at the officers and lunging at them.
2. The case seems mostly to be about the officer's prior awareness that this was a "swatting location", which is why the first count was dismissed. The issue is if the police ever went "hey another call to that Tomlinson prick's house, let's go over and fuck with him again". But I'm not sure how Patrick intends to prove this is the case unless some idiot cop said so much while wearing a bodycam. If all Patrick has is his narcissistic "I know what everybody else is thinking and don't have to prove anything" reasons as to why the police were targeting him, his case is dead. As it is, Satistfy Monell has become the new Satisfy Krinsky, and once again I don't see any reasonable way how Rick could get satisfaction.