- Forum Clout
- 46,996
Which victimized female organization is Pat gonna have read that to him?
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
- Thread starter Cumtown Fags
- Start date
- Forum Clout
- 113,545
If people here can read my posts they can handle this
- Forum Clout
- 51,082
His dismissal hinged on those three non-emergency calls. Think MPD poked some holes in that little fantasy.
- Forum Clout
- 20,124
Case dismissed, fatso.
- Forum Clout
- 36,748
- Forum Clout
- 14,407
"In conclusion. Given the facts put forth plaintiff is hereby declared legally fat."
- Forum Clout
- 113,545
- Forum Clout
- 32,420
I wonder what idiotic codeword Pat suggested? Boner1?
- Forum Clout
- 11,671
So now we wait for the judge to read this? We'll be here till next year.
- Forum Clout
- 17,422
Rofl Pat being a whiny cunt damages his case.
- Forum Clout
- 233,461
I’m glad they pointed out they did nothing wrong by standing on his porch and knocking on the door - Pat really tried to claim they violating his rights and broke law doing that. He’s fat.
- Forum Clout
- 11,671
I wonder what idiotic codeword Pat suggested? Boner1?
comic630
- Forum Clout
- 72,667
Can we get those faucet dick bodycams now?
- Forum Clout
- 233,461
The police have to take 911 calls seriously, that’s why it’s against the law to crank call them.
- Forum Clout
- 17,422
I love anal so I can't really comment on the arguments either side is making but I'd love to see an analysis by someone who knows this stuff.
- Forum Clout
- 7,222
My favorite passage:
Plaintiffs appear to allege that “do[ing] more” was subject to what Plaintiffs—not the trained and experienced members of law enforcement, or society in general— thought was reasonable, and that the police should have just accepted Plaintiffs’ assurances—including the assurances of Plaintiff Tomlinson, the alleged suspect—at face value and left.
I decide what standard operating procedure is, child.
Plaintiffs appear to allege that “do[ing] more” was subject to what Plaintiffs—not the trained and experienced members of law enforcement, or society in general— thought was reasonable, and that the police should have just accepted Plaintiffs’ assurances—including the assurances of Plaintiff Tomlinson, the alleged suspect—at face value and left.
I decide what standard operating procedure is, child.
- Forum Clout
- 11,290
The existence of an illicit pepperoni operation is looking more likely by the minute. What does he have to hide from the police?
- Forum Clout
- 11,671
Do we get to see the 200 pages of attachments too?