Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

[Last Word Nelsonn]

So now we wait for the judge to read this? We'll be here till next year.

 

[Steve Ramone]

Rofl Pat being a whiny cunt damages his case.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

I’m glad they pointed out they did nothing wrong by standing on his porch and knocking on the door - Pat really tried to claim they violating his rights and broke law doing that. He’s fat.

 

[Last Word Nelsonn]

I wonder what idiotic codeword Pat suggested? Boner1?

comic630

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

Can we get those faucet dick bodycams now?

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

Rofl Pat being a whiny cunt damages his case.
View attachment 220807View attachment 220806

The police have to take 911 calls seriously, that’s why it’s against the law to crank call them.

 

[Steve Ramone]

The police have to take 911 calls seriously, that’s why it’s against the law to crank call them.

I love anal so I can't really comment on the arguments either side is making but I'd love to see an analysis by someone who knows this stuff.

 

[firstimelongtime]

My favorite passage:

Plaintiffs appear to allege that “do[ing] more” was subject to what Plaintiffs—not the trained and experienced members of law enforcement, or society in general— thought was reasonable, and that the police should have just accepted Plaintiffs’ assurances—including the assurances of Plaintiff Tomlinson, the alleged suspect—at face value and left.

I decide what standard operating procedure is, child.

 

[TheDarkFezRises]

The existence of an illicit pepperoni operation is looking more likely by the minute. What does he have to hide from the police?

 

[Last Word Nelsonn]

Do we get to see the 200 pages of attachments too?

 

[RobertMewler]

View attachment 220805

Cops can't say "nigger", not even in their own briefs? What's this world coming to!?

 

[RobertMewler]

I like the parts where the defense argued that the cases Pat cited actually helped them more than Pat. Ha ha.

 

[BUBBLER]

View attachment 220805

Well I certainly don't want to post on the Cook County Forums

 

[BUBBLER]

Fawk I can't believe Jerkstore died before reading this. Should have delayed the operation

 

[BUBBLER]

I like the parts where the defense argued that the cases Pat cited actually helped them more than Pat. Ha ha.

Same thing happened with Rodney Mayer

 

[kingship75]

I love anal so I can't really comment on the arguments either side is making but I'd love to see an analysis by someone who knows this stuff.

Dan should book Judge Judy.

 

[DeadWithoutMyDavid]

Here's gpt's interpretation for my fellow tards:

The document you uploaded is a Reply Brief filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin for the case Niki Robinson and Patrick Tomlinson vs. City of Milwaukee and others, Case No. 24-CV-00264.

The brief primarily addresses the defendants' arguments in favor of dismissing the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Here are a few key points covered:

911 Case Precedent: The defendants argue that the 911 precedent applies equally to all emergency service requests, even those made through non-emergency means like a VPN to a suicide prevention line or a crisis text line. They claim the seriousness of the tips justified the officers' actions.

Reliability of Emergency Requests: Defendants argue that prior knowledge of false emergency service calls does not make subsequent calls unreliable, especially when they involve potentially life-threatening situations. They defend the officers' actions as reasonable, given the circumstances.

Qualified Immunity: The brief claims that the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. It argues that the constitutional rights in question should be defined in the context of emergency responses, not just as a broad principle about warrantless searches and seizures.

Knock and Talk Procedure: Defendants also discuss the legality of the "knock and talk" procedure, emphasizing that it does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

 

[Last Word Nelsonn]

Do we get to see the 200 pages of attachments too?

I'm serious, are these not public?

 

[Suetonius]

My favorite passage:

Plaintiffs appear to allege that “do[ing] more” was subject to what Plaintiffs—not the trained and experienced members of law enforcement, or society in general— thought was reasonable, and that the police should have just accepted Plaintiffs’ assurances—including the assurances of Plaintiff Tomlinson, the alleged suspect—at face value and left.

I decide what standard operating procedure is, child.

This is what I said way back at the start of this. The police are called out being told that Pat killed Niki, and are somehow supposed to take Pats word of him going “No i didnt kill her now fuck off and no you cant see her” as acceptable.

 

[highpitchmike]

The existence of an illicit pepperoni operation is looking more likely by the minute. What does he have to hide from the police?

When’s all written down like this in one spot, this looks like a man getting ready to kill his wife and making sure police ignore the 911 calls to his hovel.